These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

413 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1546117)

  • 1. ALCOVE: an exemplar-based connectionist model of category learning.
    Kruschke JK
    Psychol Rev; 1992 Jan; 99(1):22-44. PubMed ID: 1546117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Combining exemplar-based category representations and connectionist learning rules.
    Nosofsky RM; Kruschke JK; McKinley SC
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1992 Mar; 18(2):211-33. PubMed ID: 1532819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Incorporating prior biases in network models of conceptual rule learning.
    Choi S; McDaniel MA; Busemeyer JR
    Mem Cognit; 1993 Jul; 21(4):413-23. PubMed ID: 8350732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Rules and exemplars in category learning.
    Erickson MA; Kruschke JK
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 1998 Jun; 127(2):107-40. PubMed ID: 9622910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparing models of rule-based classification learning: a replication and extension of Shepard, Hovland, and Jenkins (1961).
    Nosofsky RM; Gluck MA; Palmeri TJ; McKinley SC; Glauthier P
    Mem Cognit; 1994 May; 22(3):352-69. PubMed ID: 8007837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Prototype and exemplar accounts of category learning and attentional allocation: a reassessment.
    Zaki SR; Nosofsky RM; Stanton RD; Cohen AL
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2003 Nov; 29(6):1160-73. PubMed ID: 14622053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Costs and benefits of automatization in category learning of ill-defined rules.
    Raijmakers ME; Schmittmann VD; Visser I
    Cogn Psychol; 2014 Mar; 69():1-24. PubMed ID: 24418795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The representation of perceived shape similarity and its role for category learning in monkeys: a modeling study.
    Op de Beeck HP; Wagemans J; Vogels R
    Vision Res; 2008 Feb; 48(4):598-610. PubMed ID: 18199467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Base-rate effects in category learning: a comparison of parallel network and memory storage-retrieval models.
    Estes WK; Campbell JA; Hatsopoulos N; Hurwitz JB
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1989 Jul; 15(4):556-71. PubMed ID: 2526853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Rule-plus-exception model of classification learning.
    Nosofsky RM; Palmeri TJ; McKinley SC
    Psychol Rev; 1994 Jan; 101(1):53-79. PubMed ID: 8121960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Learning categories at different hierarchical levels: a comparison of category learning models.
    Palmeri TJ
    Psychon Bull Rev; 1999 Sep; 6(3):495-503. PubMed ID: 12198789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Recency effects as a window to generalization: separating decisional and perceptual sequential effects in category learning.
    Jones M; Love BC; Maddox WT
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Mar; 32(2):316-32. PubMed ID: 16569149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Exemplar and prototype models revisited: response strategies, selective attention, and stimulus generalization.
    Nosofsky RM; Zaki SR
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2002 Sep; 28(5):924-40. PubMed ID: 12219799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Rules and exemplars in categorization, identification, and recognition.
    Nosofsky RM; Clark SE; Shin HJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1989 Mar; 15(2):282-304. PubMed ID: 2522517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of similarity and experience on discrimination learning: a nonassociative connectionist model of perceptual learning.
    Saksida LM
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1999 Jul; 25(3):308-23. PubMed ID: 10423855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Exemplar similarity and the development of automaticity.
    Palmeri TJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1997 Mar; 23(2):324-54. PubMed ID: 9080007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Extending the ALCOVE model of category learning to featural stimulus domains.
    Lee MD; Navarro DJ
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2002 Mar; 9(1):43-58. PubMed ID: 12026953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Similarity and discrimination: a selective review and a connectionist model.
    Pearce JM
    Psychol Rev; 1994 Oct; 101(4):587-607. PubMed ID: 7984708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of similarity and practice on speeded classification response times and accuracies: further tests of an exemplar-retrieval model.
    Nosofsky RM; Alfonso-Reese LA
    Mem Cognit; 1999 Jan; 27(1):78-93. PubMed ID: 10087858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Tests of an exemplar model for relating perceptual classification and recognition memory.
    Nosofsky RM
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1991 Feb; 17(1):3-27. PubMed ID: 1826320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 21.