137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15461301)
1. Effect of CT on competitiveness, productivity and diagnostic accuracy.
McClennan B; Thrall J; van Elzakker T
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2004 Sep; 183(3 Suppl):5. PubMed ID: 15461301
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Effect of advances in CT on practice.
Fulton J; Green J; Thrall J
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2004 Sep; 183(3 Suppl):4-5. PubMed ID: 15461300
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Factors warranting increased spending for CT.
Fulton J; Thrall J
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2004 Sep; 183(3 Suppl):7-8. PubMed ID: 15461305
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. CT in your clinical practice.
Kohs GJ; Legunn J
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2004 Sep; 183(3 Suppl):1-12. PubMed ID: 15461297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. TQM: best antidote for MD practice problems.
Johnsson J
Hospitals; 1992 Mar; 66(5):64. PubMed ID: 1740294
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Allocation of financial resources for CT in a practice.
Fulton J; Thrall J; van Elzakker T
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2004 Sep; 183(3 Suppl):6. PubMed ID: 15461303
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Achieving greater patient throughput.
McClennan B
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2004 Sep; 183(3 Suppl):9. PubMed ID: 15461308
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. CT usage.
van Elzakker T; Baron R; Thrall J
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2004 Sep; 183(3 Suppl):2-3. PubMed ID: 15461298
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Allocation of financial resources for CT in the field of radiology.
Fulton J; van Elzakker T
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2004 Sep; 183(3 Suppl):6-7. PubMed ID: 15461304
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Procedures that may be replaced by CT.
Green J; Thrall J
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2004 Sep; 183(3 Suppl):8. PubMed ID: 15461306
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. How hard should you be working?
Terry K
Med Econ; 1998 Jul; 75(13):69-70, 73-6, 81-4. PubMed ID: 10181350
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Issues affecting CT.
McClennan B; Fulton J; van Elzakker T; Thrall J; Baron R
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2004 Sep; 183(3 Suppl):9-11. PubMed ID: 15461309
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Referring physicians' awareness of CT benefits.
Baron R; McClennan B; Thrall J
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2004 Sep; 183(3 Suppl):11-2. PubMed ID: 15461310
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Revolution?
Geier GR
Minn Med; 2005 May; 88(5):17. PubMed ID: 16022401
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. CT quality assurance in the mid 1980s. Part 1.
Burkhart RL; McCrohan JL; Shuman FG
Appl Radiol; 1987 Jun; 16(6):25, 28-30, 34, passim. PubMed ID: 10286999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. ACR practice guideline for the performance and interpretation of cardiac computed tomography (CT).
Jacobs JE; Boxt LM; Desjardins B; Fishman EK; Larson PA; Schoepf J;
J Am Coll Radiol; 2006 Sep; 3(9):677-85. PubMed ID: 17412148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Prospects for patient procedural volume.
Thrall J
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2004 Sep; 183(3 Suppl):8. PubMed ID: 15461307
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. CT quality assurance in the mid 1980s. Part 2.
Burkhart RL; McCrohan JL; Shuman FG
Appl Radiol; 1987 Jul; 16(7):27-8, 30, 33-5. PubMed ID: 10287001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Do profiles change the way doctors practice?
Tselikis P
Bus Health; 2000 Feb; 18(2):23-4, 27-9. PubMed ID: 11066198
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Wading in the gene pool.
Maldonado M
Tex Med; 1999 Jun; 95(6):30-6. PubMed ID: 10370349
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
