These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1546183)

  • 41. Choice between different concentrations of sucrose in an adjusting-magnitude schedule: Evidence for reinforcer-specific value maxima.
    Bradshaw CM
    Behav Processes; 2020 Dec; 181():104275. PubMed ID: 33075441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Rats' choices between one and two delayed reinforcers.
    Mazur JE
    Learn Behav; 2007 Aug; 35(3):169-76. PubMed ID: 17918422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Operant behavior in dwarf hamsters (Phodopus campbelli): Effects of rate of reinforcement and reinforcer flavor variety.
    Lupfer-Johnson G; Murphy ES; Blackwell LC; LaCasse JL; Drummond S
    Behav Processes; 2010 Jun; 84(2):573-80. PubMed ID: 20188801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Conditioned reinforcement and choice with delayed and uncertain primary reinforcers.
    Mazur JE
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1995 Mar; 63(2):139-50. PubMed ID: 7714448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Assessing preference and reinforcer effectiveness in dogs.
    Vicars SM; Miguel CF; Sobie JL
    Behav Processes; 2014 Mar; 103():75-83. PubMed ID: 24270051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. A progressive-duration schedule of reinforcement.
    Gulotta KB; Byrne T
    Behav Processes; 2015 Dec; 121():93-7. PubMed ID: 26536304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Comparison of sucrose and maltose as reinforcers in an operant choice paradigm.
    Bradshaw CM
    Behav Processes; 2024 Aug; 220():105075. PubMed ID: 38944130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Choice between reinforcer delays versus choice between reinforcer magnitudes: differential Fos expression in the orbital prefrontal cortex and nucleus accumbens core.
    da Costa Araújo S; Body S; Valencia Torres L; Olarte Sanchez CM; Bak VK; Deakin JF; Anderson IM; Bradshaw CM; Szabadi E
    Behav Brain Res; 2010 Dec; 213(2):269-77. PubMed ID: 20570596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Transitional and steady-state choice behavior under an adjusting-delay schedule.
    Torres LV; Araújo Sda C; Sanchez CM; Body S; Bradshaw CM; Szabadi E
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2011 Jan; 95(1):57-74. PubMed ID: 21541116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Effects of time between trials on rats' and pigeons' choices with probabilistic delayed reinforcers.
    Mazur JE; Biondi DR
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2011 Jan; 95(1):41-56. PubMed ID: 21541170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Context conditional flavor preferences in the rat based on fructose and maltodextrin reinforcers.
    Dwyer DM; Quirk RH
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2008 Apr; 34(2):294-302. PubMed ID: 18426311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. The effect of food deprivation on self-control.
    Logue AW; Peña-Correal TE
    Behav Processes; 1985 May; 10(4):355-68. PubMed ID: 24897571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Quantitative analysis of performance on a progressive-ratio schedule: effects of reinforcer type, food deprivation and acute treatment with Δ⁹-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC).
    Olarte-Sánchez CM; Valencia-Torres L; Cassaday HJ; Bradshaw CM; Szabadi E
    Behav Processes; 2015 Apr; 113():122-31. PubMed ID: 25637881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Timeout from a high-force requirement as a reinforcer: an effective procedure for human operant research.
    Alessandri J; Rivière V
    Behav Processes; 2013 Oct; 99():1-6. PubMed ID: 23751256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Resistance to extinction following variable-interval reinforcement: reinforcer rate and amount.
    Shull RL; Grimes JA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2006 Jan; 85(1):23-39. PubMed ID: 16602374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Further observations on the reinforcing value of sucrose solutions: Interaction between quantity and concentration.
    Bradshaw CM
    Behav Processes; 2023 Nov; 213():104946. PubMed ID: 37805081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Reinforcer-ratio variation and its effects on rate of adaptation.
    Landon J; Davison M
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2001 Mar; 75(2):207-34. PubMed ID: 11394487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Level of deprivation does not affect degree of discounting in pigeons.
    Oliveira L; Calvert AL; Green L; Myerson J
    Learn Behav; 2013 Jun; 41(2):148-58. PubMed ID: 22983791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. The effects of constant versus varied reinforcers on preference and resistance to change.
    Milo JS; Mace FC; Nevin JA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2010 May; 93(3):385-94. PubMed ID: 21119852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Quinine pellets as an inferior good and a Giffen good in rats.
    Hastjarjo T; Silberberg A; Hursh SR
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1990 Mar; 53(2):263-71. PubMed ID: 2324666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.