These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
196 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15462133)
21. Chemical mixtures: greater-than-additive effects? LeBlanc GA; Wang G Environ Health Perspect; 2006 Sep; 114(9):A517-8; author reply A518-9. PubMed ID: 16966072 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. The EU REACH system: opportunities and threats. Balls M Altern Lab Anim; 2006 Mar; 34 Suppl 1():1-4. PubMed ID: 16555954 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. A regulatory framework for controlling effluent discharges using toxicity testing in the UK. Whitehouse P; Johnson I; Forrow DM; Chubb C Ecotoxicology; 2004 Jul; 13(5):399-411. PubMed ID: 15462132 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Computational Modeling of Mixture Toxicity. Chatterjee M; Roy K Methods Mol Biol; 2022; 2425():561-587. PubMed ID: 35188647 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Safety and nutritional assessment of GM plants and derived food and feed: the role of animal feeding trials. EFSA GMO Panel Working Group on Animal Feeding Trials Food Chem Toxicol; 2008 Mar; 46 Suppl 1():S2-70. PubMed ID: 18328408 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Developing novel in vitro methods for the risk assessment of developmental and placental toxicants in the environment. Fry RC; Bangma J; Szilagyi J; Rager JE Toxicol Appl Pharmacol; 2019 Sep; 378():114635. PubMed ID: 31233757 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Evidence from whole-sediment, porewater, and elutriate testing in toxicity assessment of contaminated sediments. Liss W; Ahlf W Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 1997 Mar; 36(2):140-7. PubMed ID: 9126431 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Background of REACH in EU regulations on evaluation of chemicals. Foth H; Hayes A Hum Exp Toxicol; 2008 Jun; 27(6):443-61. PubMed ID: 18784197 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. [Prospects of the use of a quantitative functional-morphological method in the evaluation of toxicity of chemical substances]. Popuchiyev VV Med Tr Prom Ekol; 1995; (12):24-7. PubMed ID: 8673382 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Study on Risk Assessment Methods and Zoning of Hazardous Chemicals Leaking into Seas. Wu J; Xu G; Guo H; Zhang Y; Xia F; Fang G Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2022 Nov; 19(22):. PubMed ID: 36429435 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Environmental impact assessment model for substitution of hazardous substances by using life cycle approach. Oguzcan S; Dvarioniene J; Tugnoli A; Kruopiene J Environ Pollut; 2019 Nov; 254(Pt A):112945. PubMed ID: 31377337 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. A comparative survey of chemistry-driven in silico methods to identify hazardous substances under REACH. Nendza M; Gabbert S; Kühne R; Lombardo A; Roncaglioni A; Benfenati E; Benigni R; Bossa C; Strempel S; Scheringer M; Fernández A; Rallo R; Giralt F; Dimitrov S; Mekenyan O; Bringezu F; Schüürmann G Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2013 Aug; 66(3):301-14. PubMed ID: 23707536 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. [Results of analysis of ratios of indices of toxic and sensory effect of chemicals]. Novikov SM; Shashina TA Gig Sanit; 2013; (6):78-80. PubMed ID: 24624828 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Toxicodynamics of low level toxicant interactions of biological significance: inhibition of tissue repair. Mehendale HM Toxicology; 1995 Dec; 105(2-3):251-66. PubMed ID: 8571362 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Chemical mixtures released from hazardous waste sites: implications for health risk assessment. Johnson BL; DeRosa CT Toxicology; 1995 Dec; 105(2-3):145-56. PubMed ID: 8571353 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Advancing alternatives analysis: The role of predictive toxicology in selecting safer chemical products and processes. Malloy T; Zaunbrecher V; Beryt E; Judson R; Tice R; Allard P; Blake A; Cote I; Godwin H; Heine L; Kerzic P; Kostal J; Marchant G; McPartland J; Moran K; Nel A; Ogunseitan O; Rossi M; Thayer K; Tickner J; Whittaker M; Zarker K Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2017 Sep; 13(5):915-925. PubMed ID: 28247928 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Chemical testing strategies for predicting health hazards to children. Lamb JC; Brown SM Reprod Toxicol; 2000; 14(2):83-94. PubMed ID: 10825671 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Integrated testing and intelligent assessment-new challenges under REACH. Ahlers J; Stock F; Werschkun B Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2008 Oct; 15(7):565-72. PubMed ID: 18818964 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. On the use of in silico tools for prioritising toxicity testing of the low-volume industrial chemicals in REACH. Rybacka A; Rudén C; Andersson PL Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol; 2014 Jul; 115(1):77-87. PubMed ID: 24428755 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]