127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15462546)
1. [Comparison of the evolution of women with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia degree III treated with cervical cone: negative vs positive surgical margin].
Chávez Zamudio MA; Castro Laura S
Ginecol Obstet Mex; 2004 Jun; 72():279-82. PubMed ID: 15462546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Incomplete excision of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia as a predictor of the risk of recurrent disease-a 16-year follow-up study.
Alder S; Megyessi D; Sundström K; Östensson E; Mints M; Belkić K; Arbyn M; Andersson S
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Feb; 222(2):172.e1-172.e12. PubMed ID: 31473226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The efficacy of cervical conization in the treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in HIV-positive women.
Holcomb K; Matthews RP; Chapman JE; Abulafia O; Lee YC; Borges A; Buhl A
Gynecol Oncol; 1999 Sep; 74(3):428-31. PubMed ID: 10479504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Outcome after conization for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade III: relation with surgical margins, extension to the crypts and mitoses.
Maluf PJ; Adad SJ; Murta EF
Tumori; 2004; 90(5):473-7. PubMed ID: 15656332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The effectiveness of cold-knife conization (CKC) for post-menopausal women with cervical high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion: a retrospective study.
Li X; Liu M; Ji Y; Qu P
BMC Surg; 2021 May; 21(1):241. PubMed ID: 33975589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Prediction of persistence or recurrence after conization for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia III.
Lu CH; Liu FS; Kuo CJ; Chang CC; Ho ES
Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Apr; 107(4):830-5. PubMed ID: 16582119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Study on high risk factors associated with positive margin of cervix conization in patient with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia].
Lu HX; Chen YX; Ni J; Wan XY; Lü WG; Xie X
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2009 Mar; 44(3):200-3. PubMed ID: 19570446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Prognostic factors of cervical high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions treated by cold knife conization with negative margin].
Meng QW; Qin ZH; Mao Y; Zhao XD
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2007 Jul; 42(7):457-9. PubMed ID: 17961334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. What is the value of pre-surgical variables in addition to cone dimensions in predicting cone margin status?
Giannella L; Di Giuseppe J; Prandi S; Delli Carpini G; Tsiroglou D; Ciavattini A
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2020 Jan; 244():180-184. PubMed ID: 31812841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Risk Factors for Persistence or Recurrence of High-Grade Cervical Squamous Intraepithelial Lesions.
Bittencourt DD; Zanine RM; Sebastião APM; Ribas CM
Rev Col Bras Cir; 2023; 50():e20233537. PubMed ID: 38055549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Prediction of residual neoplasia based on histopathology and margin status of conization specimens.
Chang DY; Cheng WF; Torng PL; Chen RJ; Huang SC
Gynecol Oncol; 1996 Oct; 63(1):53-6. PubMed ID: 8898168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Risk of recurrent disease following conization of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 according to post-conization HPV status and surgical margins.
Sand FL; Frederiksen K; Kjaer SK
Gynecol Oncol; 2022 Jun; 165(3):472-477. PubMed ID: 35400526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. High-grade CIN on cervical biopsy and predictors of the subsequent cone histology results in women undergoing immediate conization.
Giannella L; Mfuta K; Gardini G; Rubino T; Fodero C; Prandi S
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2015 Mar; 186():68-74. PubMed ID: 25656975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. High-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) in pregnancy: clinicotherapeutic management.
Penna C; Fallani MG; Maggiorelli M; Zipoli E; Cardelli A; Marchionni M
Tumori; 1998; 84(5):567-70. PubMed ID: 9862518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Predictors of recurrent dysplasia after a cervical loop electrocautery excision procedure for CIN-3: a study of margin, endocervical gland, and quadrant involvement.
Livasy CA; Maygarden SJ; Rajaratnam CT; Novotny DB
Mod Pathol; 1999 Mar; 12(3):233-8. PubMed ID: 10102607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Clinical outcome and high risk factor for residual lesion analysis of HSIL half a year after loop electrosurgical excision procedure: a clinical study of 1 502 cases].
Liu L; Chen LM; Tao X; Dai F; Guo LP; Zhang HW; Zhou XR; Sui L
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2017 Nov; 52(11):751-756. PubMed ID: 29179270
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Repeat LEEP conization in patients with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 and positive ectocervical margins.
Ayhan A; Boynukalin FK; Guven S; Dogan NU; Esinler I; Usubutun A
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2009 Apr; 105(1):14-7. PubMed ID: 19111301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Post-conization follow-up of patients with CIN 2/3 with different amount of distance to negative cone biopsy margin: a retrospective cohort study.
Giray B; Kabaca-Kocakusak C; Guray-Uzun M; Akis S
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2020 Apr; 40(3):406-410. PubMed ID: 31455147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Association of menopause, aging and treatment procedures with positive margins after therapeutic cervical conization for CIN 3: a retrospective study of 8,856 patients by the Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology.
Ikeda M; Mikami M; Yasaka M; Enomoto T; Kobayashi Y; Nagase S; Yokoyama M; Katabuchi H
J Gynecol Oncol; 2021 Sep; 32(5):e68. PubMed ID: 34132067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Risk factors for residual disease after cervical conization in patients with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grades 2 and 3 and positive surgical margins.
Ayhan A; Tuncer HA; Reyhan NH; Kuscu E; Dursun P
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2016 Jun; 201():1-6. PubMed ID: 27038228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
