These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
26. PC_Eyewitness and the sequential superiority effect: computer-based lineup administration. MacLin OH; Zimmerman LA; Malpass RS Law Hum Behav; 2005 Jun; 29(3):303-21. PubMed ID: 15965630 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Sequential lineup laps and eyewitness accuracy. Steblay NK; Dietrich HL; Ryan SL; Raczynski JL; James KA Law Hum Behav; 2011 Aug; 35(4):262-74. PubMed ID: 20632113 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Biased lineup instructions and face identification from video images. Thompson WB; Johnson J J Gen Psychol; 2008 Jan; 135(1):23-36. PubMed ID: 18318406 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. The grain-size lineup: A test of a novel eyewitness identification procedure. Horry R; Brewer N; Weber N Law Hum Behav; 2016 Apr; 40(2):147-58. PubMed ID: 26595704 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. New signal detection theory-based framework for eyewitness performance in lineups. Lee J; Penrod SD Law Hum Behav; 2019 Oct; 43(5):436-454. PubMed ID: 31368723 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Double-blind photo lineups using actual eyewitnesses: an experimental test of a sequential versus simultaneous lineup procedure. Wells GL; Steblay NK; Dysart JE Law Hum Behav; 2015 Feb; 39(1):1-14. PubMed ID: 24933175 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Are accurate witnesses more likely to make absolute judgments? Pozzulo JD; Crescini C; Lemieux JM Int J Law Psychiatry; 2008 Dec; 31(6):495-501. PubMed ID: 18954905 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. On the presumption of evidentiary independence: can confessions corrupt eyewitness identifications? Hasel LE; Kassin SM Psychol Sci; 2009 Jan; 20(1):122-6. PubMed ID: 19152544 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Sequential lineup presentation promotes less-biased criterion setting but does not improve discriminability. Palmer MA; Brewer N Law Hum Behav; 2012 Jun; 36(3):247-55. PubMed ID: 22667814 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Children's identification of faces from lineups: the effects of lineup presentation and instructions on accuracy. Beresford J; Blades M J Appl Psychol; 2006 Sep; 91(5):1102-13. PubMed ID: 16953771 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. A re-examination of the effects of biased lineup instructions in eyewitness identification. Clark SE Law Hum Behav; 2005 Oct; 29(5):575-604. PubMed ID: 16254744 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Estimating the reliability of eyewitness identifications from police lineups. Wixted JT; Mickes L; Dunn JC; Clark SE; Wells W Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2016 Jan; 113(2):304-9. PubMed ID: 26699467 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. The confidence-accuracy relationship in eyewitness identification: effects of lineup instructions, foil similarity, and target-absent base rates. Brewer N; Wells GL J Exp Psychol Appl; 2006 Mar; 12(1):11-30. PubMed ID: 16536656 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]