These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

203 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15462624)

  • 21. Feature binding across different visual dimensions.
    Ward R; Arend I
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2012 Oct; 74(7):1406-15. PubMed ID: 22688495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Forward and backward repetition blindness in speed and accuracy.
    Wong KF; Chen HC
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Jun; 35(3):778-86. PubMed ID: 19485691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Should I stay or should I go? Attentional disengagement from visually unique and unexpected items at fixation.
    Brockmole JR; Boot WR
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Jun; 35(3):808-15. PubMed ID: 19485693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The role of spatial and nonspatial information in visual selection.
    Theeuwes J; Van der Burg E
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2007 Dec; 33(6):1335-51. PubMed ID: 18085947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Visual search and dual tasks reveal two distinct attentional resources.
    VanRullen R; Reddy L; Koch C
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2004; 16(1):4-14. PubMed ID: 15006031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Effect of template complexity on visual search and dual-task performance.
    Bourke PA; Duncan J
    Psychol Sci; 2005 Mar; 16(3):208-13. PubMed ID: 15733201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Interference from multi-dimensional objects during feature and conjunction discriminations.
    Fournier LR; Bowd C; Herbert RJ
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2000 Feb; 53(1):191-209. PubMed ID: 10718070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Involuntary transfer of a top-down attentional set into the focus of attention: evidence from a contingent attentional capture paradigm.
    Moore KS; Weissman DH
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Aug; 72(6):1495-509. PubMed ID: 20675796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Temporal limitations in the effective binding of attended target attributes in the mutual masking of visual objects.
    Hommuk K; Bachmann T
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Jun; 35(3):648-60. PubMed ID: 19485683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Working memory capacity and the top-down control of visual search: Exploring the boundaries of "executive attention".
    Kane MJ; Poole BJ; Tuholski SW; Engle RW
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Jul; 32(4):749-77. PubMed ID: 16822145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Change blindness and visual memory: visual representations get rich and act poor.
    Varakin DA; Levin DT
    Br J Psychol; 2006 Feb; 97(Pt 1):51-77. PubMed ID: 16464287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. How much attention does an event file need?
    Hommel B
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2005 Oct; 31(5):1067-82. PubMed ID: 16262499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Episodic retrieval and feature facilitation in intertrial priming of visual search.
    Ásgeirsson ÁG; Kristjánsson Á
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Jul; 73(5):1350-60. PubMed ID: 21491164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. What drives memory-driven attentional capture? The effects of memory type, display type, and search type.
    Olivers CN
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Oct; 35(5):1275-91. PubMed ID: 19803636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. On the speed of pop-out in feature search.
    Turatto M; Valsecchi M; Seiffert AE; Caramazza A
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Oct; 36(5):1145-52. PubMed ID: 20718563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Automatization and training in visual search.
    Czerwinski M; Lightfoot N; Shiffrin RM
    Am J Psychol; 1992; 105(2):271-315. PubMed ID: 1621883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Feature-based memory-driven attentional capture: visual working memory content affects visual attention.
    Olivers CN; Meijer F; Theeuwes J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Oct; 32(5):1243-65. PubMed ID: 17002535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Feature binding in children and young adults.
    Lorsbach TC; Reimer JF
    J Genet Psychol; 2005 Sep; 166(3):313-27. PubMed ID: 16173674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Top-down feature-based selection of matching features for audio-visual synchrony discrimination.
    Fujisaki W; Nishida S
    Neurosci Lett; 2008 Mar; 433(3):225-30. PubMed ID: 18281153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Inverse target- and cue-priming effects of masked stimuli.
    Mattler U
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2007 Feb; 33(1):83-102. PubMed ID: 17311481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.