BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

1228 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15464463)

  • 41. Endoscopic ultrasound cannot determine suitability for esophagectomy after aggressive chemoradiotherapy for esophageal cancer.
    Zuccaro G; Rice TW; Goldblum J; Medendorp SV; Becker M; Pimentel R; Gitlin L; Adelstein DJ
    Am J Gastroenterol; 1999 Apr; 94(4):906-12. PubMed ID: 10201455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Impact of pretreatment imaging on survival of esophagectomy after induction therapy for esophageal cancer: who should be given the benefit of the doubt?: esophagectomy outcomes of patients with suspicious metastatic lesions.
    Erhunmwunsee L; Englum BR; Onaitis MW; D'Amico TA; Berry MF
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2015 Mar; 22(3):1020-5. PubMed ID: 25234017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. FDG-PET/CT tumor segmentation-derived indices of metabolic activity to assess response to neoadjuvant therapy and progression-free survival in esophageal cancer: correlation with histopathology results.
    Mamede M; Abreu-E-Lima P; Oliva MR; Nosé V; Mamon H; Gerbaudo VH
    Am J Clin Oncol; 2007 Aug; 30(4):377-88. PubMed ID: 17762438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Time course of tumor metabolic activity during chemoradiotherapy of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma and response to treatment.
    Wieder HA; Brücher BL; Zimmermann F; Becker K; Lordick F; Beer A; Schwaiger M; Fink U; Siewert JR; Stein HJ; Weber WA
    J Clin Oncol; 2004 Mar; 22(5):900-8. PubMed ID: 14990646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Treatment of clinical T2N0M0 esophageal cancer.
    Hardacker TJ; Ceppa D; Okereke I; Rieger KM; Jalal SI; LeBlanc JK; DeWitt JM; Kesler KA; Birdas TJ
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2014 Nov; 21(12):3739-43. PubMed ID: 25047477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Metabolic tumor width parameters as determined on PET/CT predict disease-free survival and treatment response in squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus.
    Roedl JB; Halpern EF; Colen RR; Sahani DV; Fischman AJ; Blake MA
    Mol Imaging Biol; 2009; 11(1):54-60. PubMed ID: 18769974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Pretreatment staging by endoscopic ultrasonography does not predict complete response to neoadjuvant chemoradiation in patients with esophageal carcinoma.
    Mallery S; DeCamp M; Bueno R; Mentzer SJ; Sugarbaker DJ; Swanson SJ; Van Dam J
    Cancer; 1999 Sep; 86(5):764-9. PubMed ID: 10463973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Sequential FDG-PET and induction chemotherapy in locally advanced adenocarcinoma of the Oesophago-gastric junction (AEG): the Heidelberg Imaging program in Cancer of the oesophago-gastric junction during Neoadjuvant treatment: HICON trial.
    Lorenzen S; von Gall C; Stange A; Haag GM; Weitz J; Haberkorn U; Lordick F; Weichert W; Abel U; Debus J; Jäger D; Münter MW
    BMC Cancer; 2011 Jun; 11():266. PubMed ID: 21702914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Value of complete metabolic response by (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography in oesophageal cancer for prediction of pathologic response and survival after preoperative chemoradiotherapy.
    Kim MK; Ryu JS; Kim SB; Ahn JH; Kim SY; Park SI; Kim YH; Song HY; Shin JH; Jung HY; Lee GH; Choi KD; Cho KJ; Kim JH
    Eur J Cancer; 2007 Jun; 43(9):1385-91. PubMed ID: 17512192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy with concurrent cisplatin/5-fluorouracil is associated with increased pathologic complete response and improved survival compared to carboplatin/paclitaxel in patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer.
    Haisley KR; Hart KD; Nabavizadeh N; Bensch KG; Vaccaro GM; Thomas CR; Schipper PH; Hunter JG; Dolan JP
    Dis Esophagus; 2017 Jul; 30(7):1-7. PubMed ID: 28475724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Role of positron emission tomography in the (re-)staging of oesophageal cancer.
    Westerterp M; Van Westreenen HL; Sloof GW; Plukker JT; Van Lanschot JJ
    Scand J Gastroenterol Suppl; 2006; (243):116-22. PubMed ID: 16782630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Determinants of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy for esophageal cancer using 18F-fluorodeoxiglucose positron emission tomography (18F-FDG-PET).
    Miyata H; Yamasaki M; Takahashi T; Murakami K; Tanaka K; Yukinori K; Nakajima K; Takiguchi S; Morii E; Hatazawa J; Mori M; Doki Y
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2014 Feb; 21(2):575-82. PubMed ID: 24201746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. 18F-FDG PET in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma undergoing curative surgery: prognostic implications.
    Choi JY; Jang HJ; Shim YM; Kim K; Lee KS; Lee KH; Choi Y; Choe YS; Kim BT
    J Nucl Med; 2004 Nov; 45(11):1843-50. PubMed ID: 15534053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Positron emission tomography for assessment of the response to induction radiochemotherapy in locally advanced oesophageal cancer.
    Flamen P; Van Cutsem E; Lerut A; Cambier JP; Haustermans K; Bormans G; De Leyn P; Van Raemdonck D; De Wever W; Ectors N; Maes A; Mortelmans L
    Ann Oncol; 2002 Mar; 13(3):361-8. PubMed ID: 11996465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Use of (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography to evaluate responses to neo-adjuvant chemotherapy for primary tumor and lymph node metastasis in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.
    Makino T; Doki Y; Miyata H; Yasuda T; Yamasaki M; Fujiwara Y; Takiguchi S; Higuchi I; Hatazawa J; Monden M
    Surgery; 2008 Nov; 144(5):793-802. PubMed ID: 19081023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Importance of fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) and endoscopic ultrasonography parameters in predicting survival following surgery for esophageal cancer.
    Omloo JM; Sloof GW; Boellaard R; Hoekstra OS; Jager PL; van Dullemen HM; Fockens P; Plukker JT; van Lanschot JJ
    Endoscopy; 2008 Jun; 40(6):464-71. PubMed ID: 18543134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Outcomes of patients with esophageal cancer staged with [¹⁸F]fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET): can postchemoradiotherapy FDG-PET predict the utility of resection?
    Monjazeb AM; Riedlinger G; Aklilu M; Geisinger KR; Mishra G; Isom S; Clark P; Levine EA; Blackstock AW
    J Clin Oncol; 2010 Nov; 28(31):4714-21. PubMed ID: 20876421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Different recurrence pattern after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy compared to surgery alone in esophageal cancer patients.
    Smit JK; Güler S; Beukema JC; Mul VE; Burgerhof JG; Hospers GA; Plukker JT
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2013 Nov; 20(12):4008-15. PubMed ID: 23838922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Endoscopic ultrasonography in esophageal cancer leads to improved survival rates: results from a population-based study.
    Wani S; Das A; Rastogi A; Drahos J; Ricker W; Parsons R; Bansal A; Yen R; Hosford L; Jankowski M; Sharma P; Cook MB
    Cancer; 2015 Jan; 121(2):194-201. PubMed ID: 25236485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Modeling pathologic response of esophageal cancer to chemoradiation therapy using spatial-temporal 18F-FDG PET features, clinical parameters, and demographics.
    Zhang H; Tan S; Chen W; Kligerman S; Kim G; D'Souza WD; Suntharalingam M; Lu W
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2014 Jan; 88(1):195-203. PubMed ID: 24189128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 62.