These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

106 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15464776)

  • 1. Last menstrual period versus ultrasound for pregnancy dating.
    Barr WB; Pecci CC
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2004 Oct; 87(1):38-9. PubMed ID: 15464776
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Discrepancy in term calculation from second trimester ultrasound scan versus last menstrual period in women with type 1 diabetes.
    Eidem I; Vangen S; Henriksen T; Vollset SE; Hanssen KF; Joner G; Stene LC
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2014 Aug; 93(8):809-16. PubMed ID: 24807126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Should a first trimester dating scan be routine for all pregnancies?
    Doubilet PM
    Semin Perinatol; 2013 Oct; 37(5):307-9. PubMed ID: 24176152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Risk of cesarean delivery when second-trimester ultrasound dating disagrees with definite last menstrual period.
    Grewal J; Zhang J; Mikolajczyk RT; Ford J
    Am J Perinatol; 2010 Aug; 27(7):587-93. PubMed ID: 20232279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Early termination of pregnancy: differences in gestational age estimation using last menstrual period and ultrasound in Mexico.
    Saavedra-Avendano B; Schiavon R; Sanhueza P; Rios-Polanco R; Garcia-Martinez L; Darney BG
    Reprod Health; 2020 Jun; 17(1):89. PubMed ID: 32517698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Pregnancy dating in common practice in Cameroon: reliability of the date of last menstrual period].
    Ngowa JD; Mando E; Guegang E; Ngassam A; Kasia JM
    Pan Afr Med J; 2014; 17():264. PubMed ID: 25309664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Determinants and consequences of discrepancies in menstrual and ultrasonographic gestational age estimates.
    Morin I; Morin L; Zhang X; Platt RW; Blondel B; Bréart G; Usher R; Kramer MS
    BJOG; 2005 Feb; 112(2):145-52. PubMed ID: 15663577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Conceptional age, menstrual age, and ultrasound age: a second-trimester comparison of pregnancies of known conception date with pregnancies dated from the last menstrual period.
    Rossavik IK; Fishburne JI
    Obstet Gynecol; 1989 Feb; 73(2):243-9. PubMed ID: 2643067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Dating of pregnancy: time to forget the last menstrual period.
    Gardosi J
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Jun; 9(6):367-8. PubMed ID: 9239819
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of pregnancy dating by last menstrual period, ultrasound scanning, and their combination.
    Savitz DA; Terry JW; Dole N; Thorp JM; Siega-Riz AM; Herring AH
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2002 Dec; 187(6):1660-6. PubMed ID: 12501080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Last menstrual period provides the best estimate of gestation length for women in rural Guatemala.
    Neufeld LM; Haas JD; Grajéda R; Martorell R
    Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol; 2006 Jul; 20(4):290-8. PubMed ID: 16879501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A comparative analysis of second-trimester ultrasound dating formulae in pregnancies conceived with artificial reproductive techniques.
    Mul T; Mongelli M; Gardosi J
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 1996 Dec; 8(6):397-402. PubMed ID: 9014279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Value of "minimum menstrual age" in determining early pregnancy failure.
    Burger IM; Filly RA
    J Ultrasound Med; 2011 Nov; 30(11):1553-9. PubMed ID: 22039028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The research implications of the selection of a gestational age estimation method.
    Lynch CD; Zhang J
    Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol; 2007 Sep; 21 Suppl 2():86-96. PubMed ID: 17803622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Dating Ultrasounds are Fundamental to Modern Obstetric Care.
    Mohamed M; McCormick CA; Foo A; Meaney S; O' Donoghue K
    Ir Med J; 2022 Apr; 115(4):582. PubMed ID: 35695731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Estimated date of delivery from last menstrual period and ultrasound scan: which is more accurate?
    Rowlands S; Royston P
    Br J Gen Pract; 1993 Aug; 43(373):322-5. PubMed ID: 8251215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Expected day of delivery from ultrasound dating versus last menstrual period--obstetric outcome when dates mismatch.
    Thorsell M; Kaijser M; Almström H; Andolf E
    BJOG; 2008 Apr; 115(5):585-9. PubMed ID: 18333938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Risk for girls can be adversely affected post-term due to underestimation of gestational age by ultrasound in the second trimester.
    Björkman K; Wesström J
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2015 Dec; 94(12):1373-9. PubMed ID: 26381500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Early ultrasound dating of pregnancy: selection and measurement biases.
    Reuss ML; Hatch MC; Susser M
    J Clin Epidemiol; 1995 May; 48(5):667-74. PubMed ID: 7730922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Maternal and fetal factors which affect fetometry: use of in vitro fertilization and birth register data.
    Källén B; Finnström O; Nygren KG; Olausson PO
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2013 Oct; 170(2):372-6. PubMed ID: 23928480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.