141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15465149)
1. Anatomy based inverse planning in HDR prostate brachytherapy.
Kolkman-Deurloo IK; Deleye XG; Jansen PP; Koper PC
Radiother Oncol; 2004 Oct; 73(1):73-7. PubMed ID: 15465149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of inverse planning simulated annealing and geometrical optimization for prostate high-dose-rate brachytherapy.
Hsu IC; Lessard E; Weinberg V; Pouliot J
Brachytherapy; 2004; 3(3):147-52. PubMed ID: 15533807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A comparison of anatomy-based inverse planning with simulated annealing and graphical optimization for high-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy.
Morton GC; Sankreacha R; Halina P; Loblaw A
Brachytherapy; 2008; 7(1):12-6. PubMed ID: 18037356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Anatomy-based inverse planning simulated annealing optimization in high-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy: significant dosimetric advantage over other optimization techniques.
Jacob D; Raben A; Sarkar A; Grimm J; Simpson L
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2008 Nov; 72(3):820-7. PubMed ID: 18455325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of anatomy-based dwell position and inverse optimization in high-dose-rate brachytherapy of prostate cancer: a dosimetric comparison to a conventional cylindrical dwell position, geometric optimization, and dose-point optimization.
Yoshioka Y; Nishimura T; Kamata M; Harada H; Kanazawa K; Fuji H; Murayama S
Radiother Oncol; 2005 Jun; 75(3):311-7. PubMed ID: 15890425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Anatomy-based inverse planning dose optimization in HDR prostate implant: a toxicity study.
Mahmoudieh A; Tremblay C; Beaulieu L; Lachance B; Harel F; Lessard E; Pouliot J; Vigneault E
Radiother Oncol; 2005 Jun; 75(3):318-24. PubMed ID: 16086913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Initial comparison of inverse optimization, modified peripheral technique, and geometric optimization as real-time intraoperative computer planning options for permanent seed implantation of the prostate.
Raben A; Sammons S; Sim S; Chen H; Hanlon A; Sarkar A; Donavanik V; Grebler A; Geltzeiler J; Benge B; Glick A; Jacob D; Koprowski P
Brachytherapy; 2007; 6(4):238-45. PubMed ID: 17991621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of high-dose rate prostate brachytherapy dose distributions with iridium-192, ytterbium-169, and thulium-170 sources.
Krishnamurthy D; Weinberg V; Cunha JA; Hsu IC; Pouliot J
Brachytherapy; 2011; 10(6):461-5. PubMed ID: 21397569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Inverse treatment planning based on MRI for HDR prostate brachytherapy.
Citrin D; Ning H; Guion P; Li G; Susil RC; Miller RW; Lessard E; Pouliot J; Huchen X; Capala J; Coleman CN; Camphausen K; Ménard C
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2005 Mar; 61(4):1267-75. PubMed ID: 15752909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Anatomy-based inverse optimization in high-dose-rate brachytherapy combined with hypofractionated external beam radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer: comparison of incidence of acute genitourinary toxicity between anatomy-based inverse optimization and geometric optimization.
Akimoto T; Katoh H; Kitamoto Y; Shirai K; Shioya M; Nakano T
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2006 Apr; 64(5):1360-6. PubMed ID: 16406395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Influence of dose point and inverse optimization on interstitial cervical and oropharyngeal carcinoma brachytherapy.
Ahmad F; Aletti P; Charra-Brunaud C; Van der Laarse R; Lapeyre M; Hoffstetter S; Peiffert D; Nöel A
Radiother Oncol; 2004 Dec; 73(3):331-7. PubMed ID: 15588879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A gEUD-based inverse planning technique for HDR prostate brachytherapy: feasibility study.
Giantsoudi D; Baltas D; Karabis A; Mavroidis P; Zamboglou N; Tselis N; Shi C; Papanikolaou N
Med Phys; 2013 Apr; 40(4):041704. PubMed ID: 23556874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Intraoperative real-time planned conformal prostate brachytherapy: post-implantation dosimetric outcome and clinical implications.
Zelefsky MJ; Yamada Y; Cohen GN; Sharma N; Shippy AM; Fridman D; Zaider M
Radiother Oncol; 2007 Aug; 84(2):185-9. PubMed ID: 17692978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of clinical benefits achievable by using different optimization algorithms during real-time prostate brachytherapy.
Adamczyk M; Zwierzchowski G; Malicki J; Skowronek J
Phys Med; 2013 Jan; 29(1):111-6. PubMed ID: 22221470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Early clinical experience with anatomy-based inverse planning dose optimization for high-dose-rate boost of the prostate.
Lachance B; Béliveau-Nadeau D; Lessard E; Chrétien M; Hsu IC; Pouliot J; Beaulieu L; Vigneault E
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2002 Sep; 54(1):86-100. PubMed ID: 12182978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Does inverse planning applied to Iridium192 high dose rate prostate brachytherapy improve the optimization of the dose afforded by the Paris system?
Nickers P; Lenaerts E; Thissen B; Deneufbourg JM
Radiother Oncol; 2005 Feb; 74(2):131-6. PubMed ID: 15734200
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A comparison of inverse optimization algorithms for HDR/PDR prostate brachytherapy treatment planning.
Dinkla AM; van der Laarse R; Kaljouw E; Pieters BR; Koedooder K; van Wieringen N; Bel A
Brachytherapy; 2015; 14(2):279-88. PubMed ID: 25447341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. 3D inverse treatment planning for the tandem and ovoid applicator in cervical cancer.
Dewitt KD; Hsu IC; Speight J; Weinberg VK; Lessard E; Pouliot J
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2005 Nov; 63(4):1270-4. PubMed ID: 16253782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparative study of dosimetry between high-dose-rate and permanent prostate implant brachytherapies in patients with prostate adenocarcinoma.
Wang Y; Sankreacha R; Al-Hebshi A; Loblaw A; Morton G
Brachytherapy; 2006; 5(4):251-5. PubMed ID: 17118319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Five-year outcome of intraoperative conformal permanent I-125 interstitial implantation for patients with clinically localized prostate cancer.
Zelefsky MJ; Yamada Y; Cohen GN; Shippy A; Chan H; Fridman D; Zaider M
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2007 Jan; 67(1):65-70. PubMed ID: 17189063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
