273 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15465217)
1. SIFT: a method to verify the IMRT fluence delivered during patient treatment using an electronic portal imaging device.
Vieira SC; Dirkx ML; Heijmen BJ; de Boer HC
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2004 Nov; 60(3):981-93. PubMed ID: 15465217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. 3D dose reconstruction for clinical evaluation of IMRT pretreatment verification with an EPID.
van Zijtveld M; Dirkx ML; de Boer HC; Heijmen BJ
Radiother Oncol; 2007 Feb; 82(2):201-7. PubMed ID: 17287039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Improvement of radiotherapy treatment delivery accuracy using an electronic portal imaging device.
Dirkx ML; de Boer JC; Heijmen BJ
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2006; 121(1):70-9. PubMed ID: 16877471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The use of an aSi-based EPID for routine absolute dosimetric pre-treatment verification of dynamic IMRT fields.
Van Esch A; Depuydt T; Huyskens DP
Radiother Oncol; 2004 May; 71(2):223-34. PubMed ID: 15110457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Replacing pretreatment verification with in vivo EPID dosimetry for prostate IMRT.
McDermott LN; Wendling M; Sonke JJ; van Herk M; Mijnheer BJ
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2007 Apr; 67(5):1568-77. PubMed ID: 17394951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Fast, daily linac verification for segmented IMRT using electronic portal imaging.
Vieira SC; Bolt RA; Dirkx ML; Visser AG; Heijmen BJ
Radiother Oncol; 2006 Jul; 80(1):86-92. PubMed ID: 16854483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Importing measured field fluences into the treatment planning system to validate a breathing synchronized DMLC-IMRT irradiation technique.
Verellen D; Tournel K; Linthout N; Soete G; Wauters T; Storme G
Radiother Oncol; 2006 Mar; 78(3):332-8. PubMed ID: 16533540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Patient-specific dosimetry of conventional and intensity modulated radiation therapy using a novel full Monte Carlo phase space reconstruction method from electronic portal images.
Jarry G; Verhaegen F
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Apr; 52(8):2277-99. PubMed ID: 17404469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Persistently better treatment planning results of intensity-modulated (IMRT) over conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) in prostate cancer patients with significant variation of clinical target volume and/or organs-at-risk.
Fenoglietto P; Laliberte B; Allaw A; Ailleres N; Idri K; Hay MH; Moscardo CL; Gourgou S; Dubois JB; Azria D
Radiother Oncol; 2008 Jul; 88(1):77-87. PubMed ID: 18215434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Patient-specific IMRT verification using independent fluence-based dose calculation software: experimental benchmarking and initial clinical experience.
Georg D; Stock M; Kroupa B; Olofsson J; Nyholm T; Ahnesjö A; Karlsson M
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Aug; 52(16):4981-92. PubMed ID: 17671348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A clinical application of an automated phantom-film QA procedure for validation of IMRT treatment planning and delivery.
Kapulsky A; Gejerman G; Hanley J
Med Dosim; 2004; 29(4):279-84. PubMed ID: 15528070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of dynamic and step-and-shoot intensity-modulated radiation therapy planning and delivery.
Alaei P; Higgins PD; Weaver R; Nguyen N
Med Dosim; 2004; 29(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 15023386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Correction of conebeam CT values using a planning CT for derivation of the "dose of the day".
van Zijtveld M; Dirkx M; Heijmen B
Radiother Oncol; 2007 Nov; 85(2):195-200. PubMed ID: 17936387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Direct-detection EPID dosimetry: investigation of a potential clinical configuration for IMRT verification.
Vial P; Gustafsson H; Oliver L; Baldock C; Greer PB
Phys Med Biol; 2009 Dec; 54(23):7151-69. PubMed ID: 19904032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Phantom and in-vivo measurements of dose exposure by image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT): MV portal images vs. kV portal images vs. cone-beam CT.
Walter C; Boda-Heggemann J; Wertz H; Loeb I; Rahn A; Lohr F; Wenz F
Radiother Oncol; 2007 Dec; 85(3):418-23. PubMed ID: 18023491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Head-and-neck IMRT treatments assessed with a Monte Carlo dose calculation engine.
Seco J; Adams E; Bidmead M; Partridge M; Verhaegen F
Phys Med Biol; 2005 Mar; 50(5):817-30. PubMed ID: 15798257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Verification of patient position and delivery of IMRT by electronic portal imaging.
Fielding AL; Evans PM; Clark CH
Radiother Oncol; 2004 Dec; 73(3):339-47. PubMed ID: 15588880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Intensity-modulated radiation therapy dose prescription, recording, and delivery: patterns of variability among institutions and treatment planning systems.
Das IJ; Cheng CW; Chopra KL; Mitra RK; Srivastava SP; Glatstein E
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2008 Mar; 100(5):300-7. PubMed ID: 18314476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Anatomy changes in radiotherapy detected using portal imaging.
McDermott LN; Wendling M; Sonke JJ; van Herk M; Mijnheer BJ
Radiother Oncol; 2006 May; 79(2):211-7. PubMed ID: 16698097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Treatment plan comparison between helical tomotherapy and MLC-based IMRT using radiobiological measures.
Mavroidis P; Ferreira BC; Shi C; Lind BK; Papanikolaou N
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jul; 52(13):3817-36. PubMed ID: 17664579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
