These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

191 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15465307)

  • 1. Effect of defect size on fracture strength of dental low fusion porcelain.
    Sato T; Tsuji K; Kawashima N; Sato H; Nakamura Y
    Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces; 2004 Oct; 38(1-2):77-82. PubMed ID: 15465307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Influence of surface roughness on mechanical strength of resin composite versus glass ceramic materials.
    Lohbauer U; Müller FA; Petschelt A
    Dent Mater; 2008 Feb; 24(2):250-6. PubMed ID: 17628659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of surface treatment on bond strength of low-fusing porcelain to commercially pure titanium.
    Al Hussaini I; Al Wazzan KA
    J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Oct; 94(4):350-6. PubMed ID: 16198172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of an experimental dental porcelain.
    Hamouda IM; El-Waseffy NA; Hasan AM; El-Falal AA
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2010 Nov; 3(8):610-8. PubMed ID: 20826367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Fracture mechanics principles.
    Mecholsky JJ
    Dent Mater; 1995 Mar; 11(2):111-2. PubMed ID: 8621030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of a high fracture toughness composite ceramic for dental applications.
    Aboushelib MN; Kleverlaan CJ; Feilzer AJ
    J Prosthodont; 2008 Oct; 17(7):538-44. PubMed ID: 18761572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of porcelain surface and flexural strength obtained by microwave and conventional oven glazing.
    Prasad S; Monaco EA; Kim H; Davis EL; Brewer JD
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Jan; 101(1):20-8. PubMed ID: 19105988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of framework shape on the fracture strength of implant-supported all-ceramic fixed partial dentures in the molar region.
    Tsumita M; Kokubo Y; Vult von Steyern P; Fukushima S
    J Prosthodont; 2008 Jun; 17(4):274-85. PubMed ID: 18205740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effect of hydrofluoric acid surface treatment and bond strength of a zirconia veneering ceramic.
    Chaiyabutr Y; McGowan S; Phillips KM; Kois JC; Giordano RA
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Sep; 100(3):194-202. PubMed ID: 18762031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Investigations of subcritical crack propagation of the Empress 2 all-ceramic system.
    Mitov G; Lohbauer U; Rabbo MA; Petschelt A; Pospiech P
    Dent Mater; 2008 Feb; 24(2):267-73. PubMed ID: 17631955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of artificial saliva storage on microhardness and fracture toughness of a hydrothermal glass-ceramic.
    Fahmy NZ; El Guindy J; Zamzam M
    J Prosthodont; 2009 Jun; 18(4):324-31. PubMed ID: 19486457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. All-ceramic fixed partial dentures. Studies on aluminum oxide- and zirconium dioxide-based ceramic systems.
    Vult von Steyern P
    Swed Dent J Suppl; 2005; (173):1-69. PubMed ID: 16001730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Correlation between fracture toughness and leucite content in dental porcelains.
    Cesar PF; Yoshimura HN; Miranda Júnior WG; Okada CY
    J Dent; 2005 Oct; 33(9):721-9. PubMed ID: 16199280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The impact of modifying alumina air abrasion parameters on the fracture strength of a porcelain laminate restorative material.
    Addison O; Marquis PM; Fleming GJ
    Dent Mater; 2007 Nov; 23(11):1332-41. PubMed ID: 17194472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of bond strength of a pressed ceramic fused to metal versus feldspathic porcelain fused to metal.
    Schweitzer DM; Goldstein GR; Ricci JL; Silva NR; Hittelman EL
    J Prosthodont; 2005 Dec; 14(4):239-47. PubMed ID: 16359480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Calculation of contraction stresses in dental composites by analysis of crack propagation in the matrix surrounding a cavity.
    Yamamoto T; Ferracane JL; Sakaguchi RL; Swain MV
    Dent Mater; 2009 Apr; 25(4):543-50. PubMed ID: 19100613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Compressive fracture resistance of porcelain laminates bonded to enamel or dentin with four adhesive systems.
    Piemjai M; Arksornnukit M
    J Prosthodont; 2007; 16(6):457-64. PubMed ID: 17672830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Influence of leucite content on slow crack growth of dental porcelains.
    Cesar PF; Soki FN; Yoshimura HN; Gonzaga CC; Styopkin V
    Dent Mater; 2008 Aug; 24(8):1114-22. PubMed ID: 18295876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Bridging the gap between clinical failure and laboratory fracture strength tests using a fractographic approach.
    Aboushelib MN; Feilzer AJ; Kleverlaan CJ
    Dent Mater; 2009 Mar; 25(3):383-91. PubMed ID: 18926566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Fracture toughness of porcelain using indentation method].
    Ueda H; Shinya A; Tohyama Y; Yokozuka S
    Shigaku; 1990 Oct; 78(3):487-504. PubMed ID: 2134801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.