BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15466354)

  • 1. The computer synoptic operative report--a leap forward in the science of surgery.
    Edhemovic I; Temple WJ; de Gara CJ; Stuart GC
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2004 Oct; 11(10):941-7. PubMed ID: 15466354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The computerized synoptic operative report: a novel tool in surgical residency education.
    Gur I; Gur D; Recabaren JA
    Arch Surg; 2012 Jan; 147(1):71-4. PubMed ID: 21930975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Opening the black box of cancer surgery quality: WebSMR and the Alberta experience.
    Mack LA; Bathe OF; Hebert MA; Tamano E; Buie WD; Fields T; Temple WJ
    J Surg Oncol; 2009 Jun; 99(8):525-30. PubMed ID: 19338026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Synoptic operative reports enhance documentation of best practices for rectal cancer.
    Maniar RL; Sytnik P; Wirtzfeld DA; Hochman DJ; McKay AM; Yip B; Hebbard PC; Park J
    J Surg Oncol; 2015 Oct; 112(5):555-60. PubMed ID: 26380931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Documentation of quality of care data for colon cancer surgery: comparison of synoptic and dictated operative reports.
    Maniar RL; Hochman DJ; Wirtzfeld DA; McKay AM; Yaffe CS; Yip B; Silverman R; Park J
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2014 Oct; 21(11):3592-7. PubMed ID: 24793437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluating population-based breast cancer surgical practice in real time with a web-based synoptic operative reporting system.
    Temple WJ; Chin-Lenn L; Mack LA;
    Am J Surg; 2014 May; 207(5):693-6; discussion 696-7. PubMed ID: 24576583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Quality assurance in rectal cancer treatment.
    van de Velde CJ; van den Broek CB
    Dig Dis; 2012; 30 Suppl 2():126-31. PubMed ID: 23207944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Completeness of operative reports for rectal cancer surgery.
    Kanters AE; Vu JV; Schuman AD; Van Wieren I; Duby A; Hardiman KM; Hendren SK
    Am J Surg; 2020 Jul; 220(1):165-169. PubMed ID: 31630821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Abdominoperineal resection or anterior resection for rectal cancer: patient preferences before and after treatment.
    Zolciak A; Bujko K; Kepka L; Oledzki J; Rutkowski A; Nowacki MP
    Colorectal Dis; 2006 Sep; 8(7):575-80. PubMed ID: 16919109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Low rectal cancer: a call for a change of approach in abdominoperineal resection.
    Nagtegaal ID; van de Velde CJ; Marijnen CA; van Krieken JH; Quirke P; ;
    J Clin Oncol; 2005 Dec; 23(36):9257-64. PubMed ID: 16361623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Completeness of dictated operative reports in breast cancer--the case for synoptic reporting.
    Donahoe L; Bennett S; Temple W; Hilchie-Pye A; Dabbs K; Macintosh E; Porter G
    J Surg Oncol; 2012 Jul; 106(1):79-83. PubMed ID: 22234931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Laparoscopic pelvic autonomic nerve-preserving surgery for patients with lower rectal cancer after chemoradiation therapy.
    Liang JT; Lai HS; Lee PH
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2007 Apr; 14(4):1285-7. PubMed ID: 17235719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Improvement in the accuracy of reporting key prognostic and anatomic findings during thyroidectomy by using a novel Web-based synoptic operative reporting system.
    Chambers AJ; Pasieka JL; Temple WJ
    Surgery; 2009 Dec; 146(6):1090-8. PubMed ID: 19958936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Oncological outcomes after total mesorectal excision for cure for cancer of the lower rectum: anterior vs. abdominoperineal resection.
    Wibe A; Syse A; Andersen E; Tretli S; Myrvold HE; Søreide O;
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2004 Jan; 47(1):48-58. PubMed ID: 14719151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A retrospective analysis of ultralow anterior resection vs. abdomino-perineal resection for lower rectal cancer.
    Yang Z; Xu H; Zhang W; Xu Y; Xu Z
    Hepatogastroenterology; 2012 Sep; 59(118):1780-3. PubMed ID: 22246189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Quality assurance of surgery in gastric and rectal cancer.
    Peeters KC; van de Velde CJ
    Crit Rev Oncol Hematol; 2004 Aug; 51(2):105-19. PubMed ID: 15276175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Management and outcome of local recurrence following transanal endoscopic microsurgery for rectal cancer.
    Stipa F; Giaccaglia V; Burza A
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2012 Mar; 55(3):262-9. PubMed ID: 22469792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Immediate radical resection after local excision of rectal cancer: an oncologic compromise?
    Hahnloser D; Wolff BG; Larson DW; Ping J; Nivatvongs S
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2005 Mar; 48(3):429-37. PubMed ID: 15747069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Synoptic operative record for point of care outcomes: a leap forward in knowledge translation.
    Mack LA; Dabbs K; Temple WJ
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2010 Sep; 36 Suppl 1():S44-9. PubMed ID: 20609548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Optimal surgical treatment of locally advanced low rectal cancer.
    Liska D; Weiser MR
    Minerva Chir; 2010 Apr; 65(2):181-96. PubMed ID: 20548274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.