752 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15466971)
1. Incidence of invasive breast cancer and ductal carcinoma in situ in a screening program by age: should older women continue screening?
Erbas B; Amos A; Fletcher A; Kavanagh AM; Gertig DM
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2004 Oct; 13(10):1569-73. PubMed ID: 15466971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Differences between first and subsequent rounds of the MRISC breast cancer screening program for women with a familial or genetic predisposition.
Kriege M; Brekelmans CT; Boetes C; Muller SH; Zonderland HM; Obdeijn IM; Manoliu RA; Kok T; Rutgers EJ; de Koning HJ; Klijn JG;
Cancer; 2006 Jun; 106(11):2318-26. PubMed ID: 16615112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Mammography screening for breast cancer in Copenhagen April 1991-March 1997. Mammography Screening Evaluation Group.
Lynge E
APMIS Suppl; 1998; 83():1-44. PubMed ID: 9850674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Urban-rural differences in the management of screen-detected invasive breast cancer and ductal carcinoma in situ in victoria.
Kok DL; Chang JH; Erbas B; Fletcher A; Kavanagh AM; Henderson MA; Gertig DM
ANZ J Surg; 2006 Nov; 76(11):996-1001. PubMed ID: 17054549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Results of intermediate measures from a population-based, randomized trial of mammographic screening prevalence and detection of breast carcinoma among Asian women: the Singapore Breast Screening Project.
Ng EH; Ng FC; Tan PH; Low SC; Chiang G; Tan KP; Seow A; Emmanuel S; Tan CH; Ho GH; Ng LT; Wilde CC
Cancer; 1998 Apr; 82(8):1521-8. PubMed ID: 9554530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Nationwide breast cancer screening fully accomplished; results from the implementation phase 1990-1997. National Evaluation Team for Breast Cancer Screening].
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2000 Jun; 144(23):1124-9. PubMed ID: 10876708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Prognostic characteristics of breast cancer among postmenopausal hormone users in a screened population.
Kerlikowske K; Miglioretti DL; Ballard-Barbash R; Weaver DL; Buist DS; Barlow WE; Cutter G; Geller BM; Yankaskas B; Taplin SH; Carney PA
J Clin Oncol; 2003 Dec; 21(23):4314-21. PubMed ID: 14645420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Modelling the impact of detecting and treating ductal carcinoma in situ in a breast screening programme.
McCann J; Treasure P; Duffy S
J Med Screen; 2004; 11(3):117-25. PubMed ID: 15333269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Risk of invasive breast carcinoma among women diagnosed with ductal carcinoma in situ and lobular carcinoma in situ, 1988-2001.
Li CI; Malone KE; Saltzman BS; Daling JR
Cancer; 2006 May; 106(10):2104-12. PubMed ID: 16604564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Incidence and tumor characteristics of breast cancer diagnosed before and after implementation of a population-based screening-program.
Hofvind S; Sørum R; Thoresen S
Acta Oncol; 2008; 47(2):225-31. PubMed ID: 17851868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Breast magnetic resonance image screening and ductal lavage in women at high genetic risk for breast carcinoma.
Hartman AR; Daniel BL; Kurian AW; Mills MA; Nowels KW; Dirbas FM; Kingham KE; Chun NM; Herfkens RJ; Ford JM; Plevritis SK
Cancer; 2004 Feb; 100(3):479-89. PubMed ID: 14745863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Screening caused rising incidence rates of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast.
van Steenbergen LN; Voogd AC; Roukema JA; Louwman WJ; Duijm LE; Coebergh JW; van de Poll-Franse LV
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2009 May; 115(1):181-3. PubMed ID: 18516674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Triple-negative breast cancer in West Virginia.
Abraham J; Flanagan M; Hazard H; Jubelirer S; Tirona MT; Vona-Davis L
W V Med J; 2009 Oct; 105 Spec No():54-9. PubMed ID: 19999267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Age-specific incidence rates of in situ breast carcinomas by histologic type, 1980 to 2001.
Li CI; Daling JR; Malone KE
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2005 Apr; 14(4):1008-11. PubMed ID: 15824180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Relationship of breast magnetic resonance imaging to outcome after breast-conservation treatment with radiation for women with early-stage invasive breast carcinoma or ductal carcinoma in situ.
Solin LJ; Orel SG; Hwang WT; Harris EE; Schnall MD
J Clin Oncol; 2008 Jan; 26(3):386-91. PubMed ID: 18202414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Pathological characteristics in screening versus clinically-detected breast cancer].
Paziault M; Terrade FX; Fermeaux V; Pascal B; Darreye G; Dussartre C; Gilquin M; Labrousse F; Tubiana-Mathieu N
Bull Cancer; 2006 Jul; 93(7):731-6. PubMed ID: 16873082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The influence of age on the breast surgery decision-making process.
Bleicher RJ; Abrahamse P; Hawley ST; Katz SJ; Morrow M
Ann Surg Oncol; 2008 Mar; 15(3):854-62. PubMed ID: 18058182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Recent trends in breast cancer incidence rates by age and tumor characteristics among U.S. women.
Jemal A; Ward E; Thun MJ
Breast Cancer Res; 2007; 9(3):R28. PubMed ID: 17477859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A comparison of clinical-pathological characteristics between symptomatic and interval breast cancer.
Meshkat B; Prichard RS; Al-Hilli Z; Bass GA; Quinn C; O'Doherty A; Rothwell J; Geraghty J; Evoy D; McDermott EW
Breast; 2015 Jun; 24(3):278-82. PubMed ID: 25771080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Detection method and breast carcinoma histology.
Newcomer LM; Newcomb PA; Trentham-Dietz A; Storer BE; Yasui Y; Daling JR; Potter JD
Cancer; 2002 Aug; 95(3):470-7. PubMed ID: 12209738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
