894 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15467062)
1. Interventions to improve research participants' understanding in informed consent for research: a systematic review.
Flory J; Emanuel E
JAMA; 2004 Oct; 292(13):1593-601. PubMed ID: 15467062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Improving understanding in the research informed consent process: a systematic review of 54 interventions tested in randomized control trials.
Nishimura A; Carey J; Erwin PJ; Tilburt JC; Murad MH; McCormick JB
BMC Med Ethics; 2013 Jul; 14():28. PubMed ID: 23879694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Interventions to improve patient comprehension in informed consent for medical and surgical procedures: a systematic review.
Schenker Y; Fernandez A; Sudore R; Schillinger D
Med Decis Making; 2011; 31(1):151-73. PubMed ID: 20357225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Participant comprehension of research for which they volunteer: a systematic review.
Montalvo W; Larson E
J Nurs Scholarsh; 2014 Nov; 46(6):423-31. PubMed ID: 25130209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. An enhanced participant information leaflet and multimedia intervention to improve the quality of informed consent to a randomised clinical trial enrolling people living with HIV and obesity: a protocol for a Study Within A Trial (SWAT).
O'Sullivan L; Savinelli S; O'Hare S; Holden S; McHugh C; Mallon P; Doran P
Trials; 2022 Jan; 23(1):50. PubMed ID: 35039057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Getting meaningful informed consent from older adults: a structured literature review of empirical research.
Sugarman J; McCrory DC; Hubal RC
J Am Geriatr Soc; 1998 Apr; 46(4):517-24. PubMed ID: 9560079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Interventions to Improve Patient Comprehension in Informed Consent for Medical and Surgical Procedures: An Updated Systematic Review.
Glaser J; Nouri S; Fernandez A; Sudore RL; Schillinger D; Klein-Fedyshin M; Schenker Y
Med Decis Making; 2020 Feb; 40(2):119-143. PubMed ID: 31948345
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Improving participant comprehension in the informed consent process.
Cohn E; Larson E
J Nurs Scholarsh; 2007; 39(3):273-80. PubMed ID: 17760802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. American Society of Clinical Oncology policy statement: oversight of clinical research.
American Society of Clinical Oncology
J Clin Oncol; 2003 Jun; 21(12):2377-86. PubMed ID: 12721281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Improved participants' understanding of research information in real settings using the SIDCER informed consent form: a randomized-controlled informed consent study nested with eight clinical trials.
Koonrungsesomboon N; Tharavanij T; Phiphatpatthamaamphan K; Vilaichone RK; Manuwong S; Curry P; Siramolpiwat S; Punchaipornpon T; Kanitnate S; Tammachote N; Yamprasert R; Chanvimalueng W; Kaewkumpai R; Netanong S; Kitipawong P; Sritipsukho P; Karbwang J
Eur J Clin Pharmacol; 2017 Feb; 73(2):141-149. PubMed ID: 27838760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Improving the informed consent process for research subjects with low literacy: a systematic review.
Tamariz L; Palacio A; Robert M; Marcus EN
J Gen Intern Med; 2013 Jan; 28(1):121-6. PubMed ID: 22782275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Discrepancy between participants' understanding and desire to know in informed consent: are they informed about what they really want to know?
Koh J; Goh E; Yu KS; Cho B; Yang JH
J Med Ethics; 2012 Feb; 38(2):102-6. PubMed ID: 21708828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Improvement of informed consent and the quality of consent documents.
Jefford M; Moore R
Lancet Oncol; 2008 May; 9(5):485-93. PubMed ID: 18452859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Improving assent in health research: a rapid systematic review.
Soll D; Guraiib MM; Rollins NC; Reis AA
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2020 May; 20(1):114. PubMed ID: 32404063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Impact of individual clinical outcomes on trial participants' perspectives on enrollment in emergency research without consent.
Whitesides LW; Baren JM; Biros MH; Fleischman RJ; Govindarajan PR; Jones EB; Pancioli AM; Pentz RD; Scicluna VM; Wright DW; Dickert NW
Clin Trials; 2017 Apr; 14(2):180-186. PubMed ID: 28359192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Research participants' perceptions and views on consent for biobank research: a review of empirical data and ethical analysis.
D'Abramo F; Schildmann J; Vollmann J
BMC Med Ethics; 2015 Sep; 16():60. PubMed ID: 26354520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Using a multimedia presentation to improve patient understanding and satisfaction with informed consent for minimally invasive vascular procedures.
Bowers N; Eisenberg E; Montbriand J; Jaskolka J; Roche-Nagle G
Surgeon; 2017 Feb; 15(1):7-11. PubMed ID: 26464072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Improving informed consent of surgical patients using a multimedia-based program? Results of a prospective randomized multicenter study of patients before cholecystectomy.
Bollschweiler E; Apitzsch J; Obliers R; Koerfer A; Mönig SP; Metzger R; Hölscher AH
Ann Surg; 2008 Aug; 248(2):205-11. PubMed ID: 18650629
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Participants' understanding of the process of psychological research: informed consent.
Brody JL; Gluck JP; Aragon AS
Ethics Behav; 1997; 7(4):285-98. PubMed ID: 11655335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
