96 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15467079)
1. Returning to the Alder Hey report and its reporting: addressing confusions and improving inquiries.
Dewar S; Boddington P
J Med Ethics; 2004 Oct; 30(5):463-9. PubMed ID: 15467079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The implications of the Human Tissue Act 2004 for dentistry.
Forsyth L; Woof M
Br Dent J; 2006 Dec; 201(12):790-1. PubMed ID: 17183410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Reflections on the nature of public ethics.
Montgomery J
Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 2013 Jan; 22(1):9-21. PubMed ID: 23206354
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Lessons of Alder Hey: consent must be informed.
Glasper EA; Powell C
Br J Nurs; 2001 Feb 22-Mar 7; 10(4):213. PubMed ID: 12170643
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Brain donation for research: consent and re-consent post Alder Hey.
Barnes L; Matthews FE; Barber B; Davies L; Lloyd D; Brayne C; Parry B
Bull Med Ethics; 2005; (211):17-21. PubMed ID: 17139813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Law and regulation of retained organs: the ethical issues.
Harris J
Leg Stud (Soc Leg Scholars); 2002 Nov; 22(4):527-49. PubMed ID: 16032790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Presumed consent, autonomy, and organ donation.
Gill MB
J Med Philos; 2004 Feb; 29(1):37-59. PubMed ID: 15449812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. "She's got Bette Davis eyes": assessing the nonconsensual removal of cadaver organs under the takings and due process clauses.
Jaffe ES
Columbia Law Rev; 1990 Mar; 90(2):528-74. PubMed ID: 11659304
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Parental consent and the use of dead children's bodies.
Wilkinson TM
Kennedy Inst Ethics J; 2001 Dec; 11(4):337-58. PubMed ID: 11838507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Governing the postmortem procurement of human body material for research.
Van Assche K; Capitaine L; Pennings G; Sterckx S
Kennedy Inst Ethics J; 2015 Mar; 25(1):67-88. PubMed ID: 25843120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The organs crisis and the Spanish model: theoretical versus pragmatic considerations.
Quigley M; Brazier M; Chadwick R; Michel MN; Paredes D
J Med Ethics; 2008 Apr; 34(4):223-4. PubMed ID: 18375669
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Communicating with families about post-mortems: practice guidance.
Henderson N
Paediatr Nurs; 2006 Feb; 18(1):38-40. PubMed ID: 16518953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Legal requirements for donating and retaining organs: the Human Tissue Act.
Griffith R
Br J Community Nurs; 2006 Oct; 11(10):446-9. PubMed ID: 17167359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The Nuffield Council report on human tissue.
Grubb A
Med Law Rev; 1995; 3(3):235-6. PubMed ID: 11657688
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Organ transplantation crisis: should the deficit be eliminated through inter vivos sales?
Boyce RM
Akron Law Rev; 1983; 17(2):283-302. PubMed ID: 11650016
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Tricky ethics of tissue samples.
Holden C
Science; 1998 Mar; 279(5357):1621. PubMed ID: 11645031
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Secret human experiments test trust in government.
Guttman D
Forum Appl Res Public Policy; 1997; 12(3):109-14. PubMed ID: 12962097
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The Human Tissue Act 2004 and the child donor.
Baston J
Paediatr Nurs; 2009 May; 21(4):19-20. PubMed ID: 19505059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Regulating human body parts and products.
Fox M; McHale J
Health Care Anal; 2000; 8(2):83-6. PubMed ID: 11183447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Is presumed consent the answer to organ shortages? Yes.
English V
BMJ; 2007 May; 334(7603):1088. PubMed ID: 17525449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
