These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
326 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15467787)
1. Molecular and physiological comparisons between Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Saccharomyces boulardii. Fietto JL; Araújo RS; Valadão FN; Fietto LG; Brandão RL; Neves MJ; Gomes FC; Nicoli JR; Castro IM Can J Microbiol; 2004 Aug; 50(8):615-21. PubMed ID: 15467787 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Molecular tools for differentiating probiotic and clinical strains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Posteraro B; Sanguinetti M; Romano L; Torelli R; Novarese L; Fadda G Int J Food Microbiol; 2005 Sep; 103(3):295-304. PubMed ID: 16099314 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Clustering of Saccharomyces boulardii strains within the species S. cerevisiae using molecular typing techniques. Mitterdorfer G; Mayer HK; Kneifel W; Viernstein H J Appl Microbiol; 2002; 93(4):521-30. PubMed ID: 12234334 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Relatedness of medically important strains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae as revealed by phylogenetics and metabolomics. MacKenzie DA; Defernez M; Dunn WB; Brown M; Fuller LJ; de Herrera SR; Günther A; James SA; Eagles J; Philo M; Goodacre R; Roberts IN Yeast; 2008 Jul; 25(7):501-12. PubMed ID: 18615862 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Quantitative real time PCR assays for the enumeration of Saccharomyces cerevisiae and the Saccharomyces sensu stricto complex in human feces. Chang HW; Nam YD; Sung Y; Kim KH; Roh SW; Yoon JH; An KG; Bae JW J Microbiol Methods; 2007 Dec; 71(3):191-201. PubMed ID: 17900724 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Food and probiotic strains from the Saccharomyces cerevisiae species as a possible origin of human systemic infections. de Llanos R; Querol A; Pemán J; Gobernado M; Fernández-Espinar MT Int J Food Microbiol; 2006 Aug; 110(3):286-90. PubMed ID: 16782223 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The taxonomic position of Saccharomyces boulardii as evaluated by sequence analysis of the D1/D2 domain of 26S rDNA, the ITS1-5.8S rDNA-ITS2 region and the mitochondrial cytochrome-c oxidase II gene. van der Aa Kühle A; Jespersen L Syst Appl Microbiol; 2003 Nov; 26(4):564-71. PubMed ID: 14666985 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. FTIR spectroscopic discrimination of Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Saccharomyces bayanus strains. Adt I; Kohler A; Gognies S; Budin J; Sandt C; Belarbi A; Manfait M; Sockalingum GD Can J Microbiol; 2010 Sep; 56(9):793-801. PubMed ID: 20921989 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Saccharomyces arboricolus sp. nov., a yeast species from tree bark. Wang SA; Bai FY Int J Syst Evol Microbiol; 2008 Feb; 58(Pt 2):510-4. PubMed ID: 18218959 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A genetic analysis of taxonomic relation between Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Saccharomyces bayanus. Banno I; Kaneko Y Yeast; 1989 Apr; 5 Spec No():S373-7. PubMed ID: 2665368 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Evolutionary relationships between the former species Saccharomyces uvarum and the hybrids Saccharomyces bayanus and Saccharomyces pastorianus; reinstatement of Saccharomyces uvarum (Beijerinck) as a distinct species. Nguyen HV; Gaillardin C FEMS Yeast Res; 2005 Feb; 5(4-5):471-83. PubMed ID: 15691752 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Limitations on the use of polymerase chain reaction--restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis of the rDNA NTS2 region for the taxonomic classification of the species Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Pulvirenti A; Solieri L; De Vero L; Giudici P Can J Microbiol; 2005 Sep; 51(9):759-64. PubMed ID: 16391654 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Reclassification of Saccharomyces strains by comparative electrophoretic karyotyping]. Bai F; Jia J Wei Sheng Wu Xue Bao; 2000 Feb; 40(1):9-13. PubMed ID: 12548871 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. In vitro screening of probiotic properties of Saccharomyces cerevisiae var. boulardii and food-borne Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains. van der Aa Kühle A; Skovgaard K; Jespersen L Int J Food Microbiol; 2005 May; 101(1):29-39. PubMed ID: 15878404 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Molecular genetic study of introgression between Saccharomyces bayanus and S. cerevisiae. Naumova ES; Naumov GI; Masneuf-Pomarède I; Aigle M; Dubourdieu D Yeast; 2005 Oct; 22(14):1099-115. PubMed ID: 16240458 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Genetic homology between Saccharomyces cerevisiae and its sibling species S. paradoxus and S. bayanus: electrophoretic karyotypes. Naumov GI; Naumova ES; Lantto RA; Louis EJ; Korhola M Yeast; 1992 Aug; 8(8):599-612. PubMed ID: 1441740 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Selection of hypervariable microsatellite loci for the characterization of Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains. Legras JL; Ruh O; Merdinoglu D; Karst F Int J Food Microbiol; 2005 Jun; 102(1):73-83. PubMed ID: 15925004 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Characterization of natural hybrids of Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Saccharomyces bayanus var. uvarum. Le Jeune C; Lollier M; Demuyter C; Erny C; Legras JL; Aigle M; Masneuf-Pomarède I FEMS Yeast Res; 2007 Jun; 7(4):540-9. PubMed ID: 17302940 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Genetically different wine yeasts isolated from Austrian vine-growing regions influence wine aroma differently and contain putative hybrids between Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Saccharomyces kudriavzevii. Lopandic K; Gangl H; Wallner E; Tscheik G; Leitner G; Querol A; Borth N; Breitenbach M; Prillinger H; Tiefenbrunner W FEMS Yeast Res; 2007 Sep; 7(6):953-65. PubMed ID: 17484739 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A homozygous diploid subset of commercial wine yeast strains. Bradbury JE; Richards KD; Niederer HA; Lee SA; Rod Dunbar P; Gardner RC Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek; 2006 Jan; 89(1):27-37. PubMed ID: 16328862 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]