BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

357 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15468506)

  • 21. Fourteenth amendment--the right to refuse antipsychotic drugs masked by prison bars.
    Sindel PE
    J Crim Law Criminol; 1991; 81(4):952-80. PubMed ID: 16145787
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Forcible medication and personal autonomy: the case of Charles Thomas Sell.
    Quinlan M
    Boston Univ Law Rev; 2004 Feb; 84(1):275-99. PubMed ID: 16211756
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. What medical school did you graduate from? Judicial prescribing of medical treatments.
    Miller RD
    J Psychiatry Law; 2000; 28(2):215-33. PubMed ID: 12546011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. On the execution of the death penalty.
    Slovenko R
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2003; 31(3):282-4. PubMed ID: 14584525
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Refusal of medical treatment in "captive" circumstances.
    Somerville MA
    Can Bar Rev; 1985; 63():59-90. PubMed ID: 11660372
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. "Synthetic sanity": the ethics and legality of using psychotropic medications to render death row inmates competent for execution.
    Daugherty KM
    J Contemp Health Law Policy; 2001; 17(2):715-35. PubMed ID: 11475573
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Major tranquilizers in prison: drug therapy and the unconsenting inmate.
    Sitnick SA
    Willamette Law J; 1975; 11(3):378-97. PubMed ID: 11664569
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [Role of psychiatrists in capital punishment].
    Yamamoto M
    Seishin Shinkeigaku Zasshi; 2005; 107(7):691-5. PubMed ID: 16250120
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Trial rights and psychotropic drugs: the case against administering involuntary medications to a defendant during trial.
    Klein DW
    Vanderbilt Law Rev; 2002; 55(1):165-218. PubMed ID: 12680366
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Competency to refuse psychotropic medication: three alternatives to the law's cognitive standard.
    Saks ER
    Univ Miami Law Rev; 1993 Jan; 47(3):689-761. PubMed ID: 16617526
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Medical treatment and human experimentation: introducing illegality, fraud, duress and incapacity to the doctrine of informed consent.
    Rutgers Camden Law J; 1975; 6(3):538-64. PubMed ID: 11664504
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Physicians and the death penalty.
    Thorburn KM
    West J Med; 1987 May; 146(5):638-40. PubMed ID: 3590773
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. [Role of psychiatrists in capital punishment cases : a review].
    Nakajima N
    Seishin Shinkeigaku Zasshi; 2002; 104(3):229-40. PubMed ID: 11985117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Ethical problems in forensic psychiatry.
    Taylor RW; Buchanan A
    Curr Opin Psychiatry; 1998 Nov; 11(6):695-702. PubMed ID: 11660781
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Presumed dangerous: California's selective policy of forcibly medicating state prisoners with antipsychotic drugs.
    Gross DE
    Univ Calif Davis Law Rev; 2002 Jan; 35():483-517. PubMed ID: 17066562
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Psychiatry and the death penalty: the past decade.
    Leong GB; Weinstock R; Silva JA; Eth S
    Psychiatr Ann; 1993 Jan; 23(1):41-7. PubMed ID: 11659516
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [Final declaration of the Japanese Society of Psychiatry and Neurology concerning the participation of psychiatrists in executions].
    Seishin Shinkeigaku Zasshi; 2005; 107(7):676-80. PubMed ID: 16146186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Denouement of an execution competency case: is Perry pyrrhic?
    Mossman D
    Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1995; 23(2):269-84. PubMed ID: 8605411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Physician participation in capital punishment: evaluating competence of condemned prisoners; treating condemned prisoners to restore competence. Council on Ethical and Judicial Affairs, American Medical Association.
    Tex Med; 1997 Feb; 93(2):50-2. PubMed ID: 9043182
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Cruelty to the mentally ill: an Eighth Amendment challenge to the abolition of the insanity defense.
    LeBlanc SM
    Am Univ Law Rev; 2007 Jun; 56(5):1281-328. PubMed ID: 17632959
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.