These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
693 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15468542)
21. Comparison of glass-ionomer cements used to repair cast restorations. Carlson TJ; Naguib EA; Cochran MA; Lund MR Oper Dent; 1990; 15(5):162-6. PubMed ID: 2098724 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Long-term survival and cost-effectiveness of five dental restorative materials used in various classes of cavity preparations. Smales RJ; Hawthorne WS Int Dent J; 1996 Jun; 46(3):126-30. PubMed ID: 8886864 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. The future of dental amalgam: a review of the literature. Part 7: Possible alternative materials to amalgam for the restoration of posterior teeth. Eley BM Br Dent J; 1997 Jul; 183(1):11-4. PubMed ID: 9254957 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. The use of dental amalgam in pediatric dentistry: review of the literature. Osborne JW; Summitt JB; Roberts HW Pediatr Dent; 2002; 24(5):439-47. PubMed ID: 12412958 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Selection of luting agents, part 1. Jivraj SA; Kim TH; Donovan TE J Calif Dent Assoc; 2006 Feb; 34(2):149-60. PubMed ID: 16724470 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. [Evaluation of amalgam filling and inlay in the therapy of lesions of the hard tissue in posterior teeth]. Beetke E; Gatzer M; Ritter G Dtsch Stomatol (1990); 1990 Nov; 40(11):454-7. PubMed ID: 2133198 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Recreating Mother Nature with direct resin restorations. Nazarian A Dent Today; 2009 Apr; 28(4):82, 84. PubMed ID: 19408587 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. [New direct restorative materials]. Hickel R; Dasch W; Janda R; Tyas M; Anusavice K Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 1999 Apr; 106(4):128-40. PubMed ID: 11930356 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. In vitro evaluation of push-out bond strength of direct ceramic inlays to tooth surface with fiber-reinforced composite at the interface. Cekic I; Ergun G; Uctasli S; Lassila LV J Prosthet Dent; 2007 May; 97(5):271-8. PubMed ID: 17547945 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Contemporary dental practice in the UK: indirect restorations and fixed prosthodontics. Brunton PA; Christensen GJ; Cheung SW; Burke FJ; Wilson NH Br Dent J; 2005 Jan; 198(2):99-103; discussion 89. PubMed ID: 15702109 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Restorative material for children's teeth: preferences of parents and children. Peretz B; Ram D ASDC J Dent Child; 2002; 69(3):243-8, 233. PubMed ID: 12613305 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Factors influencing dentists' choice of amalgam and tooth-colored restorative materials for Class II preparations in younger patients. Vidnes-Kopperud S; Tveit AB; Gaarden T; Sandvik L; Espelid I Acta Odontol Scand; 2009; 67(2):74-9. PubMed ID: 19085213 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Direct and indirect restorative materials. ADA Council on Scientific Affairs J Am Dent Assoc; 2003 Apr; 134(4):463-72. PubMed ID: 12733780 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Effects of elevated temperatures on various restorative materials: an in vitro study. Bose RS; Mohan B; Lakshminarayanan L Indian J Dent Res; 2005; 16(2):56-60. PubMed ID: 16372794 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Interactions between cavity preparation and restoration events and their effects on pulp vitality. Wisithphrom K; Murray PE; About I; Windsor LJ Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2006 Dec; 26(6):596-605. PubMed ID: 17243333 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]