71 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15469158)
1. Operative outcome of minimal access aortic valve replacement versus standard procedure.
Vanoverbeke H; Van Belleghem Y; Francois K; Caes F; Bové T; Van Nooten G
Acta Chir Belg; 2004 Aug; 104(4):440-4. PubMed ID: 15469158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Port-access-assisted aortic valve replacement: a comparison of minimally invasive and conventional techniques.
Leshnower BG; Trace CS; Boova RS
Heart Surg Forum; 2006; 9(2):E560-4; discussion E564. PubMed ID: 16431405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Minimally invasive aortic valve replacement (AVR) compared to standard AVR.
Liu J; Sidiropoulos A; Konertz W
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 1999 Nov; 16 Suppl 2():S80-3. PubMed ID: 10613563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Is transapical aortic valve implantation really less invasive than minimally invasive aortic valve replacement?
Zierer A; Wimmer-Greinecker G; Martens S; Moritz A; Doss M
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2009 Nov; 138(5):1067-72. PubMed ID: 19740493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Minimally invasive port access surgery reduces operative morbidity for valve replacement in the elderly.
Grossi EA; Galloway AC; Ribakove GH; Buttenheim PM; Esposito R; Baumann FG; Colvin SB
Heart Surg Forum; 1999; 2(3):212-5. PubMed ID: 11276477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Propensity score analysis of a six-year experience with minimally invasive isolated aortic valve replacement.
Sharony R; Grossi EA; Saunders PC; Schwartz CF; Ribakove GH; Baumann FG; Galloway AC; Colvin SB
J Heart Valve Dis; 2004 Nov; 13(6):887-93. PubMed ID: 15597578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Minimally invasive aortic valve surgery].
Lund JT
Ugeskr Laeger; 2003 Mar; 165(13):1358-60. PubMed ID: 12703282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Minimally invasive versus standard approach aortic valve replacement: a study in 506 patients.
Bakir I; Casselman FP; Wellens F; Jeanmart H; De Geest R; Degrieck I; Van Praet F; Vermeulen Y; Vanermen H
Ann Thorac Surg; 2006 May; 81(5):1599-604. PubMed ID: 16631641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Aortic valve replacement surgery: comparison of outcomes in matched sternotomy and PORT ACCESS groups.
Brinkman WT; Hoffman W; Dewey TM; Culica D; Prince SL; Herbert MA; Mack MJ; Ryan WH
Ann Thorac Surg; 2010 Jul; 90(1):131-5. PubMed ID: 20609763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Permanent pacemaker implantation after isolated aortic valve replacement: incidence, indications, and predictors.
Dawkins S; Hobson AR; Kalra PR; Tang AT; Monro JL; Dawkins KD
Ann Thorac Surg; 2008 Jan; 85(1):108-12. PubMed ID: 18154792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Minimally invasive approach for complex cardiac surgery procedures.
Totaro P; Carlini S; Pozzi M; Pagani F; Zattera G; D'Armini AM; Vigano M
Ann Thorac Surg; 2009 Aug; 88(2):462-6; discussion 467. PubMed ID: 19632394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Re-do aortic valve replacement: does a previous homograft influence the operative outcome?
Kumar P; Athanasiou T; Ali A; Nair S; Oz BS; DeSouza A; Moat N; Shore DF; Pepper JR
J Heart Valve Dis; 2004 Nov; 13(6):904-12; discussion 912-3. PubMed ID: 15597580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Early and late outcomes of 1000 minimally invasive aortic valve operations.
Tabata M; Umakanthan R; Cohn LH; Bolman RM; Shekar PS; Chen FY; Couper GS; Aranki SF
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2008 Apr; 33(4):537-41. PubMed ID: 18255305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Parsonnet's risk score predicts late survival but not late functional results after aortic valve replacement in octogenarians.
Caus T; Calon D; Collart F; Marin P; Seree Y; Mesana T
J Heart Valve Dis; 2002 Jul; 11(4):498-503. PubMed ID: 12150296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Surgical management of aortic valve disease in the elderly: A retrospective comparative study of valve choice using propensity score analysis.
Accola KD; Scott ML; Palmer GJ; Thompson PA; Sand ME; Suarez-Cavalier JE; Bott JN; Ebra G
J Heart Valve Dis; 2008 Jul; 17(4):355-64; discussion 365. PubMed ID: 18751463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Minimally invasive reoperative isolated valve surgery: early and mid-term results.
Sharony R; Grossi EA; Saunders PC; Schwartz CF; Ursomanno P; Ribakove GH; Galloway AC; Colvin SB
J Card Surg; 2006; 21(3):240-4. PubMed ID: 16684050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Minimal access aortic valve surgery.
Olin CL; Péterffy A
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 1999 Jan; 15 Suppl 1():S32-8; discussion S39-43. PubMed ID: 10077393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Port-access aortic valve surgery: a technique in evolution.
Wheatley GH; Prince SL; Herbert MA; Ryan WH
Heart Surg Forum; 2004; 7(6):E628-31. PubMed ID: 15769696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Early outcome after surgery for active native and prosthetic aortic valve endocarditis.
Gabbieri D; Dohmen PM; Linneweber J; Grubitzsch H; von Heymann C; Neumann K; Halle E; Konertz WF
J Heart Valve Dis; 2008 Sep; 17(5):508-24; discussion 525. PubMed ID: 18980085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Should minimally invasive aortic valve replacement be restricted to primary interventions?
Bakir I; Casselman FP; De Geest R; Wellens F; Degrieck I; Van Praet F; Vermeulen Y; Vanermen H
Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2007 Aug; 55(5):304-9. PubMed ID: 17629860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
