382 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15470908)
1. Variations in dose response with x-ray energy of LiF:Mg,Cu,P thermoluminescence dosimeters: implications for clinical dosimetry.
Duggan L; Hood C; Warren-Forward H; Haque M; Kron T
Phys Med Biol; 2004 Sep; 49(17):3831-45. PubMed ID: 15470908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Response of LiF:Mg,Ti thermoluminescent dosimeters at photon energies relevant to the dosimetry of brachytherapy (<1 MeV).
Tedgren AC; Hedman A; Grindborg JE; Carlsson GA
Med Phys; 2011 Oct; 38(10):5539-50. PubMed ID: 21992372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Using LiF:Mg,Cu,P TLDs to estimate the absorbed dose to water in liquid water around an 192Ir brachytherapy source.
Lucas PA; Aubineau-Lanièce I; Lourenço V; Vermesse D; Cutarella D
Med Phys; 2014 Jan; 41(1):011711. PubMed ID: 24387503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. LiF:Mg,Ti TLD response as a function of photon energy for moderately filtered x-ray spectra in the range of 20-250 kVp relative to 60Co.
Nunn AA; Davis SD; Micka JA; DeWerd LA
Med Phys; 2008 May; 35(5):1859-69. PubMed ID: 18561661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Absorbed dose measurements from a
D'Arienzo M; Pimpinella M; De Coste V; Capogni M; Ferrari P; Mariotti F; Iaccarino G; Ungania S; Strigari L
Phys Med; 2020 Jan; 69():127-133. PubMed ID: 31901837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Whole-body dose and energy measurements in radiotherapy by a combination of LiF:Mg,Cu,P and LiF:Mg,Ti.
Hauri P; Schneider U
Z Med Phys; 2018 Apr; 28(2):96-109. PubMed ID: 28807441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The low energy X-ray response of the LiF:Mg:Cu:P thermoluminescent dosemeter: a comparison with LiF:Mg:Ti.
Edwards CR; Mountford PJ; Green S; Palethorpe JE; Moloney AJ
Br J Radiol; 2005 Jun; 78(930):543-7. PubMed ID: 15900061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Energy response of GR-200A thermoluminescence dosemeters to 60Co and to monoenergetic synchrotron radiation in the energy range 28-40 keV.
Emiro F; Di Lillo F; Mettivier G; Fedon C; Longo R; Tromba G; Russo P
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2016 Jan; 168(1):40-5. PubMed ID: 25737582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Synchrotron radiation in the study of the variation of dose response in thermoluminescence dosimeters with radiation energy.
Kron T; Smith A; Hyodo K
Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 1996 Dec; 19(4):225-36. PubMed ID: 9060209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The application of LiF:Mg,Cu,P to large scale personnel dosimetry: current status and future directions.
Moscovitch M; St John TJ; Cassata JR; Blake PK; Rotunda JE; Ramlo M; Velbeck KJ; Luo LZ
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2006; 119(1-4):248-54. PubMed ID: 16835277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Energy response of LiF and Mg2SiO4 TLDs to 10-150 keV monoenergetic photons.
Konnai A; Nariyama N; Ohnishi S; Odano N
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 115(1-4):334-6. PubMed ID: 16381741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Assessment of the mean glandular dose using LiF:Mg,Ti, LiF:Mg,Cu,P, Li2B4O7:Mn and Li2B4O7:Cu TL detectors in mammography radiation fields.
Fartaria MJ; Reis C; Pereira J; Pereira MF; Cardoso JV; Santos LM; Oliveira C; Holovey V; Pascoal A; Alves JG
Phys Med Biol; 2016 Sep; 61(17):6384-99. PubMed ID: 27499104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Thermoluminescence properties of LiF:Mg,Cu,Na,Si pellets in radiation dosimetry.
Nam YM; Kim JL
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2002; 100(1-4):467-70. PubMed ID: 12382923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Energy correction factors of LiF powder TLDs irradiated in high-energy electron beams and applied to mailed dosimetry for quality assurance networks.
Marre D; Ferreira IH; Bridier A; Björeland A; Svensson H; Dutreix A; Chavaudra J
Phys Med Biol; 2000 Dec; 45(12):3657-74. PubMed ID: 11131191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of LiF:Mg,Ti (TLD-100) for Intraoperative Electron Radiation Therapy Quality Assurance.
Liuzzi R; Savino F; D'Avino V; Pugliese M; Cella L
PLoS One; 2015; 10(10):e0139287. PubMed ID: 26427065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Energy responses of the LiF series TL pellets to high-energy photons in the energy range from 1.25 to 21 MV.
Kim JL; Lee JI; Ji YH; Kim BH; Kim JS; Chang SY
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2006; 119(1-4):353-6. PubMed ID: 16644960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparative study of LiF:Mg,Cu,Na,Si and Li2B4O7:Cu,Ag,P TL detectors.
Miljanić S; Ranogajec-Komor M; Knezević Z; Stuhec M; Prokić M
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2006; 119(1-4):191-6. PubMed ID: 16709712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effect of short-term sensitivity loss in LiF:Mg,Cu,P thermoluminescent dosemeter and its implications on personnel dosimetry operations.
Romanyukha A; Delzer JA; Grypp MD; Williams AS
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2016 Feb; 168(2):204-11. PubMed ID: 25767182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Dose response of various radiation detectors to synchrotron radiation.
Kron T; Duggan L; Smith T; Rosenfeld A; Butson M; Kaplan G; Howlett S; Hyodo K
Phys Med Biol; 1998 Nov; 43(11):3235-59. PubMed ID: 9832014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Thermoluminescent dosimeters for low dose X-ray measurements.
Del Sol Fernández S; García-Salcedo R; Sánchez-Guzmán D; Ramírez-Rodríguez G; Gaona E; de León-Alfaro MA; Rivera-Montalvo T
Appl Radiat Isot; 2016 Jan; 107():340-345. PubMed ID: 26609683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
