203 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15471021)
1. Camera and instrument holders and their clinical value in minimally invasive surgery.
Jaspers JE; Breedveld P; Herder JL; Grimbergen CA
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech; 2004 Jun; 14(3):145-52. PubMed ID: 15471021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Design and preliminary in vivo validation of a robotic laparoscope holder for minimally invasive surgery.
Herman B; Dehez B; Duy KT; Raucent B; Dombre E; Krut S
Int J Med Robot; 2009 Sep; 5(3):319-26. PubMed ID: 19455594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Design and feasibility of PASSIST, a passive instrument positioner.
Jaspers JE; Den Boer KT; Sjoerdsma W; Bruijn M; Grimbergen CA
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2000 Dec; 10(6):331-5. PubMed ID: 11132913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Automatic localization of laparoscopic instruments for the visual servoing of an endoscopic camera holder.
Voros S; Long JA; Cinquin P
Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv; 2006; 9(Pt 1):535-42. PubMed ID: 17354932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The influence of experience and camera holding on laparoscopic instrument movements measured with the TrEndo tracking system.
Chmarra MK; Kolkman W; Jansen FW; Grimbergen CA; Dankelman J
Surg Endosc; 2007 Nov; 21(11):2069-75. PubMed ID: 17479335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Is the image "right" for everyone? Introduction to the parallax effect in laparoscopic surgery.
Cahais J; Schwarz L; Bridoux V; Huet E; Tuech JJ
J Visc Surg; 2017 Feb; 154(1):11-14. PubMed ID: 27378511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Technical and instrumental prerequisites for single-port laparoscopic solo surgery: state of art.
Kim SJ; Lee SC
World J Gastroenterol; 2015 Apr; 21(15):4440-6. PubMed ID: 25914453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Decreasing strain on the surgeon in gynecologic minimally invasive surgery by using semi-active robotics.
Tchartchian G; Dietzel J; Bojahr B; Hackethal A; De Wilde R
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2011 Jan; 112(1):72-5. PubMed ID: 20947079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of robotic camera holders with human assistants in endoscopic surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Wan GY; Zhou XY; Duan HX; Zou ZY; Zhang MM; Mao JB
Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol; 2023 Aug; 32(4):153-162. PubMed ID: 37051809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. New release of the Boonpong laparoscopic camera holder.
Kornsuthisopon S
Aust N Z J Surg; 1999 Feb; 69(2):141-3. PubMed ID: 10030817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of a stand-alone robotic camera holding system: technology that improves laparoscopy.
Rade M; Birkett D; Sherman J; Nepomnayshy D
Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol; 2022 Mar; 31(3):404-409. PubMed ID: 32852261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Concurrent use of a robotic uterine manipulator and a robotic laparoscope holder to achieve assistant-less solo laparoscopy: the double ViKY.
Maheshwari M; Ind T
J Robot Surg; 2015 Sep; 9(3):211-3. PubMed ID: 26531201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Robotics and telemanipulation technologies for endoscopic surgery. A review of the ARTEMIS project. Advanced Robotic Telemanipulator for Minimally Invasive Surgery.
Schurr MO; Buess G; Neisius B; Voges U
Surg Endosc; 2000 Apr; 14(4):375-81. PubMed ID: 10790559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Benefits of Robotic Camera Assistance in Minimally Invasive Bariatric Procedures: Prospective Clinical Trial Using a Joystick-Guided Camera-Holder.
Holländer SW; Klingen HJ; Hess S; Merscher A; Glanemann M; Birk D
Surg Technol Int; 2019 May; 34():87-92. PubMed ID: 30888669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of robotic versus human laparoscopic camera control .
Kavoussi LR; Moore RG; Adams JB; Partin AW
J Urol; 1995 Dec; 154(6):2134-6. PubMed ID: 7500476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Image-based laparoscopic camera steering versus conventional steering: a comparison study.
Wijsman PJM; Molenaar L; Voskens FJ; Van't Hullenaar CDP; Broeders IAMJ
J Robot Surg; 2022 Oct; 16(5):1157-1163. PubMed ID: 35059956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The pitfalls of laparoscopic surgery: challenges for robotics and telerobotic surgery.
Ballantyne GH
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech; 2002 Feb; 12(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 12008756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Gynecologic laparoscopic surgery with a palm-controlled laparoscope holder.
Polet R; Donnez J
J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc; 2004 Feb; 11(1):73-8. PubMed ID: 15104836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Postural mechatronic assistant for laparoscopic solo surgery (PMASS).
Minor Martinez A; Villalobos Gomez J; Ordorica Flores R; Lorias Espinoza D
Surg Endosc; 2009 Mar; 23(3):663-7. PubMed ID: 18528612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Trocar and instrument positioning system TISKA. An assist device for endoscopic solo surgery.
Schurr MO; Arezzo A; Neisius B; Rininsland H; Hilzinger HU; Dorn J; Roth K; Buess GF
Surg Endosc; 1999 May; 13(5):528-31. PubMed ID: 10227959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
