These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

58 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 154720)

  • 1. [Distribution of surface pressure on models of MacKee-Farrar type total hip prosthesis].
    Comtet JJ; Rumelhart C; Bahuaud J; Moyen B
    Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 1978; 64 Suppl 2():72-9. PubMed ID: 154720
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Biomechanical relationships in total hip-joint prosthesis and their special effect on bones with decreased stability].
    Grünert A; Ritter G
    Verh Dtsch Ges Rheumatol; 1976; 4():420-3. PubMed ID: 997821
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Comparative study of different modes of acetabular cotyloid anchorage in arthroplasty of the hip].
    Halleux P; Duriau F; Blaimont P
    Acta Orthop Belg; 1974; 40(5-6):712-25. PubMed ID: 4469733
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Stress on the coxal end of the femur during loading in the hip joint flexion posture].
    Savvidis E
    Aktuelle Probl Chir Orthop; 1990; 39():1-56. PubMed ID: 1979902
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The inclination of the weight bearing surface in the hip joint. The clinical significance of abnormal force.
    Maistrelli G; Gerundini M; Bombelli R
    Orthop Rev; 1986 May; 15(5):271-9. PubMed ID: 3453935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A "second generation" total hip replacement.
    Harris WH
    Orthop Clin North Am; 1973 Apr; 4(2):513-22. PubMed ID: 4707445
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Relation between subject-specific hip joint loading, stress distribution in the proximal femur and bone mineral density changes after total hip replacement.
    Jonkers I; Sauwen N; Lenaerts G; Mulier M; Van der Perre G; Jaecques S
    J Biomech; 2008 Dec; 41(16):3405-13. PubMed ID: 19019372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Assessments of different kinds of stems by experiments and FEM analysis: appropriate stress distribution on a hip prosthesis.
    Sakai R; Itoman M; Mabuchi K
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2006 Oct; 21(8):826-33. PubMed ID: 16701927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Role of mechanical factors in the development of degenerative dystrophic lesions of the hip joint].
    Shargorodskiĭ VS; Kresnyĭ DI
    Ortop Travmatol Protez; 1989 Mar; (3):42-5. PubMed ID: 2740115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The surgical technique of total hip arthroplasty, modified from Charnley, as done at the Mayo Clinic.
    Coventry MB
    Orthop Clin North Am; 1973 Apr; 4(2):473-82. PubMed ID: 4707443
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Some anatomical and mechanical considerations relevant to the surface replacement of the femoral head.
    Freeman MA
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1978; (134):19-24. PubMed ID: 729243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A method of quantification of stress shielding in the proximal femur using hierarchical computational modeling.
    Be'ery-Lipperman M; Gefen A
    Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2006 Feb; 9(1):35-44. PubMed ID: 16880155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Determination of stresses in resurfacing arthroplasty of the hip by numerical and experimental technics].
    Bourgois R; Wagner J
    Acta Orthop Belg; 1985; 51(2-3):181-9. PubMed ID: 4050375
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Design of total hip prosthesis: the femoral stem.
    Brockhurst PJ; Svensson NL
    Med Prog Technol; 1977 Sep; 5(2):73-102. PubMed ID: 927397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Biomechanics of large femoral heads: what they do and don't do.
    Crowninshield RD; Maloney WJ; Wentz DH; Humphrey SM; Blanchard CR
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2004 Dec; (429):102-7. PubMed ID: 15577473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A measurement of proximal femur strain with total hip arthroplasty.
    Crowninshield RD; Pedersen DR; Brand RA
    J Biomech Eng; 1980 Aug; 102(3):230. PubMed ID: 19530805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Noncemented total hip arthroplasty: influence of extramedullary parameters on initial implant stability and on bone-implant interface stresses].
    Ramaniraka NA; Rakotomanana LR; Rubin PJ; Leyvraz P
    Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2000 Oct; 86(6):590-7. PubMed ID: 11060433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Biomechanics of the hip joint. I. A new model for the calculation of the forces in the hip joint].
    Debrunner HU
    Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb; 1975 Jun; 113(3):377-88. PubMed ID: 1179806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Studies on the skeletal attachment of experimental hip prostheses in the pygmy goat and the dog.
    Esslinger JO; Rutkowski EJ
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1973; 7(3):187-93. PubMed ID: 4577867
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Experimental methods for the analysis of injury of the femur with hip prosthesis prompted by fatigue].
    Prati E; Freddi A; Ranieri L; Toni A
    Chir Organi Mov; 1984; 69(3):261-4. PubMed ID: 6532660
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 3.