These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

87 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15472741)

  • 1. A linear programming approach to limited angle 3D reconstruction from DSA projections.
    Weber S; Schüle T; Schnörr C; Hornegger J
    Methods Inf Med; 2004; 43(4):320-6. PubMed ID: 15472741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Dual-energy CT angiography in the evaluation of intracranial aneurysms: image quality, radiation dose, and comparison with 3D rotational digital subtraction angiography.
    Zhang LJ; Wu SY; Niu JB; Zhang ZL; Wang HZ; Zhao YE; Chai X; Zhou CS; Lu GM
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 Jan; 194(1):23-30. PubMed ID: 20028901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Fully 3D iterative CT reconstruction using polar coordinates.
    Thibaudeau C; Leroux JD; Fontaine R; Lecomte R
    Med Phys; 2013 Nov; 40(11):111904. PubMed ID: 24320437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Four dimensional intravenous cone-beam computed tomographic subtraction angiography. In vitro study of feasibility.
    Pollmann SI; Norley CJ; Pelz DM; Lownie SP; Holdsworth DW
    Invest Radiol; 2008 Nov; 43(11):753-61. PubMed ID: 18923254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A three-dimensional-weighted cone beam filtered backprojection (CB-FBP) algorithm for image reconstruction in volumetric CT-helical scanning.
    Tang X; Hsieh J; Nilsen RA; Dutta S; Samsonov D; Hagiwara A
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 Feb; 51(4):855-74. PubMed ID: 16467583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Spectrotemporal CT data acquisition and reconstruction at low dose.
    Clark DP; Lee CL; Kirsch DG; Badea CT
    Med Phys; 2015 Nov; 42(11):6317-36. PubMed ID: 26520724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A shape-based segmentation algorithm for X-ray digital subtraction angiography images.
    Franchi D; Gallo P; Marsili L; Placidi G
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2009 Jun; 94(3):267-78. PubMed ID: 19264373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Slice reconstruction of 3D vessel based on object-oriented quantization].
    Yu H; Mou X; Cai Y
    Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 2003 Jun; 20(2):318-21. PubMed ID: 12856609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A 2D driven 3D vessel segmentation algorithm for 3D digital subtraction angiography data.
    Spiegel M; Redel T; Struffert T; Hornegger J; Doerfler A
    Phys Med Biol; 2011 Oct; 56(19):6401-19. PubMed ID: 21908904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Ultra-fast digital tomosynthesis reconstruction using general-purpose GPU programming for image-guided radiation therapy.
    Park JC; Park SH; Kim JS; Han Y; Cho MK; Kim HK; Liu Z; Jiang SB; Song B; Song WY
    Technol Cancer Res Treat; 2011 Aug; 10(4):295-306. PubMed ID: 21728386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Angle-independent measure of motion for image-based gating in 3D coronary angiography.
    Lehmann GC; Holdsworth DW; Drangova M
    Med Phys; 2006 May; 33(5):1311-20. PubMed ID: 16752566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Benefits of 3D rotational DSA compared with 2D DSA in the evaluation of intracranial aneurysm.
    Wong SC; Nawawi O; Ramli N; Abd Kadir KA
    Acad Radiol; 2012 Jun; 19(6):701-7. PubMed ID: 22578227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. 3D reconstruction of the cerebral arterial network from stereotactic DSA.
    Coste E; Vasseur C; Rousseau J
    Med Phys; 1999 Sep; 26(9):1783-93. PubMed ID: 10505865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A comparison of reconstruction algorithms for C-arm mammography tomosynthesis.
    Rakowski JT; Dennis MJ
    Med Phys; 2006 Aug; 33(8):3018-32. PubMed ID: 16964880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of 3-dimensional spinal reconstruction accuracy: biplanar radiographs with EOS versus computed tomography.
    Glaser DA; Doan J; Newton PO
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 Jul; 37(16):1391-7. PubMed ID: 22415001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A three-dimensional reconstruction algorithm for an inverse-geometry volumetric CT system.
    Schmidt TG; Fahrig R; Pelc NJ
    Med Phys; 2005 Nov; 32(11):3234-45. PubMed ID: 16370414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Influence of different reconstruction parameters in the visualization of intracranial stents using C-arm flat panel CT angiography: experience in an animal model.
    Ott S; Struffert T; Saake M; Gölitz P; Adamek E; Doerfler A
    Acta Radiol; 2016 Feb; 57(2):233-40. PubMed ID: 25711233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Relationship between the contrast effects of raw data projection images from three-dimensional digital subtraction angiography and the optimal volume rendering parameters.
    Takagi S; Tokumitsu H; Sanada S
    J Digit Imaging; 2015 Jun; 28(3):368-72. PubMed ID: 25447419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Accurate registration of random radiographic projections based on three spherical references for the purpose of few-view 3D reconstruction.
    Schulze R; Heil U; Weinheimer O; Gross D; Bruellmann D; Thomas E; Schwanecke U; Schoemer E
    Med Phys; 2008 Feb; 35(2):546-55. PubMed ID: 18383676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Automatic lumen segmentation in calcified plaques: dual-energy CT versus standard reconstructions in comparison with digital subtraction angiography.
    Thomas C; Korn A; Ketelsen D; Danz S; Tsifikas I; Claussen CD; Ernemann U; Heuschmid M
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 Jun; 194(6):1590-5. PubMed ID: 20489101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.