These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1547290)

  • 1. [Analysis of the difference between the results of complex mammography and histology-- a contribution to the sensitivity and specificity of mammography].
    Kettritz U; Preuss HJ
    Aktuelle Radiol; 1992 Jan; 2(1):19-25. PubMed ID: 1547290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The value of ultrasound mammography in palpable breast masses.
    van Oord JC; van der Vliet AM; Thyn CJ; Mak B; Hoogeboom GJ
    Rofo; 1991 Jul; 155(1):63-6. PubMed ID: 1854938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Combined assessment (aspiration cytology and mammography) of clinically suspicious breast masses.
    van Wyk WF; Dent DM; Hacking EA; Learmonth G; Kottler RE; Gudgeon CA; Tiltman A
    S Afr Med J; 1995 Feb; 85(2):81-4. PubMed ID: 7597539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Contribution of mammography and echography to the diagnosis of breast cancer in Dakar: apropos of 25 cases].
    Diop-Ba S; Badiane M; Niang EH; Ly Ba A; Alfidja A; Favre Y
    Dakar Med; 1997; 42(2):114-7. PubMed ID: 9827132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Limitations of mammography in the identification of noninfiltrating carcinoma of the breast.
    Sener SF; Candela FC; Paige ML; Bernstein JR; Winchester DP
    Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1988 Aug; 167(2):135-40. PubMed ID: 2840746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Invasive lobular carcinoma of the breast: mammographic findings and extent of disease at diagnosis in 184 patients.
    Krecke KN; Gisvold JJ
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1993 Nov; 161(5):957-60. PubMed ID: 8273634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Diagnostic errors in mammography. I. False negative results].
    Morrone D; Ambrogetti D; Bravetti P; Catarzi S; Ciatto S; Rosselli del Turco M
    Radiol Med; 1991 Sep; 82(3):212-7. PubMed ID: 1947253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The significance of mammographic calcifications in early breast cancer detection.
    Rosselli Del Turco M; Ciatto S; Bravetti P; Pacini P
    Radiol Med; 1986; 72(1-2):7-12. PubMed ID: 3008222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Sensitivity, specificity, predictive value and accuracy of film/screen mammography. A three-year experience.
    Warren DL; Stelling CB
    J Ky Med Assoc; 1989 Apr; 87(4):169-73. PubMed ID: 2723524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [The diagnostic contribution of direct radiographic enlargement and of echography in the study of breast neoplasms].
    Cressa C; Gozzi G; Tonutti M; Macorig D; Tessa I
    Radiol Med; 1994 Apr; 87(4):405-11. PubMed ID: 8190922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Diagnostic effectiveness of mammography in various age groups].
    Tekkel MIu
    Med Radiol (Mosk); 1991; 36(1):44-6. PubMed ID: 1996057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Usefulness of mammography in the diagnosis and management of breast disease in postmenopausal women.
    Lamas AM; Horwitz RI; Peck D
    JAMA; 1984 Dec; 252(21):2999-3002. PubMed ID: 6502862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. False-negative mammograms in patients with breast cancer.
    Niloff PH; Sheiner NM
    Can J Surg; 1981 Jan; 24(1):50, 52. PubMed ID: 7459735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Minority report - false negative breast assessment in women recalled for suspicious screening mammography: imaging and pathological features, and associated delay in diagnosis.
    Ciatto S; Houssami N; Ambrogetti D; Bonardi R; Collini G; Del Turco MR
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2007 Sep; 105(1):37-43. PubMed ID: 17115112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [An investigation of the accuracy of mammography--diagnosis without a knowledge of the clinical findings (author's transl)].
    Hüttner J; Dallüge KH; Eichhorn HJ; Jacob R; Kriedemann E; Lessel A; Mateev B; Richter E; Rotte KH; Schröder H
    Fortschr Geb Rontgenstr Nuklearmed; 1974 May; 120(5):588-93. PubMed ID: 4367796
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Ultrasonography important as a supplement to mammography].
    den Heeten GJ; van Rooij WJ; Roukema JA
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1993 Nov; 137(46):2378-83. PubMed ID: 8264823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Mammographic and ultrasonographic findings in bilateral breast cancer: a comparative study.
    Saarela AO; Rissanen TJ; Kiviniemi HO; Paloneva TK
    Eur Radiol; 1998; 8(4):634-8. PubMed ID: 9569339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [The importance of mammography in the early diagnosis of breast cancer (author's transl)].
    Huegel A; Müller-Claus G
    Med Klin; 1976 May; 71(22):953-6. PubMed ID: 933992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The impact of mammography on breast biopsy.
    Goedde TA; Frykberg ER; Crump JM; Lay SF; Turetsky DB; Linden SS
    Am Surg; 1992 Nov; 58(11):661-6. PubMed ID: 1485695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Assessment of BI-RADS category 4 lesions detected with screening mammography and screening US: utility of MR imaging.
    Strobel K; Schrading S; Hansen NL; Barabasch A; Kuhl CK
    Radiology; 2015 Feb; 274(2):343-51. PubMed ID: 25271857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.