152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15472923)
1. Enamel thickness of deciduous and permanent molars in modern Homo sapiens.
Grine FE
Am J Phys Anthropol; 2005 Jan; 126(1):14-31. PubMed ID: 15472923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Enamel thickness and the helicoidal occlusal plane.
Macho GA; Berner ME
Am J Phys Anthropol; 1994 Jul; 94(3):327-37. PubMed ID: 7943189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Two-dimensional patterns of human enamel thickness on deciduous (dm1, dm2) and permanent first (M1) mandibular molars.
Mahoney P
Arch Oral Biol; 2010 Feb; 55(2):115-26. PubMed ID: 20056193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Modern human molar enamel thickness and enamel-dentine junction shape.
Smith TM; Olejniczak AJ; Reid DJ; Ferrell RJ; Hublin JJ
Arch Oral Biol; 2006 Nov; 51(11):974-95. PubMed ID: 16814245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A three-dimensional analysis of enamel distribution patterns in human permanent first molars.
Kono RT; Suwa G; Tanijiri T
Arch Oral Biol; 2002 Dec; 47(12):867-75. PubMed ID: 12450518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Enamel thickness variation in the deciduous dentition of extant large-bodied hominoids.
Ortiz A; Schander-Triplett K; Bailey SE; Skinner MM; Hublin JJ; Schwartz GT
Am J Phys Anthropol; 2020 Nov; 173(3):500-513. PubMed ID: 32767577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Tooth crown tissue proportions and enamel thickness in Early Pleistocene Homo antecessor molars (Atapuerca, Spain).
Martín-Francés L; Martinón-Torres M; Martínez de Pinillos M; García-Campos C; Modesto-Mata M; Zanolli C; Rodríguez L; Bermúdez de Castro JM
PLoS One; 2018; 13(10):e0203334. PubMed ID: 30281589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Variation in enamel thickness and cusp area within human maxillary molars and its bearing on scaling techniques used for studies of enamel thickness between species.
Macho GA
Arch Oral Biol; 1994 Sep; 39(9):783-92. PubMed ID: 7802614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Associations between Carabelli trait and cusp areas in human permanent maxillary first molars.
Kondo S; Townsend GC
Am J Phys Anthropol; 2006 Feb; 129(2):196-203. PubMed ID: 16323183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Enamel thickness variation of deciduous first and second upper molars in modern humans and Neanderthals.
Fornai C; Benazzi S; Svoboda J; Pap I; Harvati K; Weber GW
J Hum Evol; 2014 Nov; 76():83-91. PubMed ID: 25282273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Human deciduous mandibular molar incremental enamel development.
Mahoney P
Am J Phys Anthropol; 2011 Feb; 144(2):204-14. PubMed ID: 20740658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Enamel thickness of human maxillary molars reconsidered.
Macho GA; Berner ME
Am J Phys Anthropol; 1993 Oct; 92(2):189-200. PubMed ID: 8273831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Variation in hominoid molar enamel thickness.
Smith TM; Olejniczak AJ; Martin LB; Reid DJ
J Hum Evol; 2005 Jun; 48(6):575-92. PubMed ID: 15927661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Testing functional and morphological interpretations of enamel thickness along the deciduous tooth row in human children.
Mahoney P
Am J Phys Anthropol; 2013 Aug; 151(4):518-25. PubMed ID: 23728787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Intraspecific variation in M1 enamel development in modern humans: implications for human evolution.
Mahoney P
J Hum Evol; 2008 Jul; 55(1):131-47. PubMed ID: 18439653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Hunter-Schreger Band configuration in human molars reveals more decussation in the lateral enamel of 'functional' cusps than 'guiding' cusps.
Yang D; Bharatiya M; Grine FE
Arch Oral Biol; 2022 Oct; 142():105524. PubMed ID: 36029738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Taxonomic and functional aspects of the patterning of enamel thickness distribution in extant large-bodied hominoids.
Schwartz GT
Am J Phys Anthropol; 2000 Feb; 111(2):221-44. PubMed ID: 10640949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of dental measurement systems for taxonomic assignment of Neanderthal and modern human lower second deciduous molars.
Benazzi S; Fornai C; Bayle P; Coquerelle M; Kullmer O; Mallegni F; Weber GW
J Hum Evol; 2011 Sep; 61(3):320-6. PubMed ID: 21624638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Tooth and cusp size reduction in second molars.
Navsa N
J Dent Assoc S Afr; 1992 Jun; 47(6):257-60. PubMed ID: 1401428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Enamel thickness and the helicoidal wear plane in modern human mandibular molars.
Schwartz GT
Arch Oral Biol; 2000 May; 45(5):401-9. PubMed ID: 10739861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
