257 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15474241)
1. Ultrasonographic cervical length measurement is not a better predictor of preterm delivery than digital examination in a population of patients with idiopathic preterm labor.
Volumenie JL; Luton D; De Spirlet M; Sibony O; Blot P; Oury JF
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2004 Nov; 117(1):33-7. PubMed ID: 15474241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Digital examination and transperineal ultrasonographic measurement of cervical length to assess risk of preterm delivery.
Onderoğlu LS
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 1997 Dec; 59(3):223-8. PubMed ID: 9486511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Ultrasonographic examination of the uterine cervix is better than cervical digital examination as a predictor of the likelihood of premature delivery in patients with preterm labor and intact membranes.
Gomez R; Galasso M; Romero R; Mazor M; Sorokin Y; Gonçalves L; Treadwell M
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1994 Oct; 171(4):956-64. PubMed ID: 7943109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Number and gestational age of prior preterm births does not modify the predictive value of a short cervix.
Yost NP; Owen J; Berghella V; Macpherson C; Swain M; Dildy GA; Miodovnik M; Langer O; Sibai B;
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Jul; 191(1):241-6. PubMed ID: 15295373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cervical sonography in preterm labor.
Iams JD; Paraskos J; Landon MB; Teteris JN; Johnson FF
Obstet Gynecol; 1994 Jul; 84(1):40-6. PubMed ID: 8008320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cervical assessment at 22 and 27 weeks for the prediction of spontaneous birth before 34 weeks in twin pregnancies: is transvaginal sonography more accurate than digital examination?
Vayssière C; Favre R; Audibert F; Chauvet MP; Gaucherand P; Tardif D; Grangé G; Novoa A; Descamps P; Perdu M; Andrini E; Janse-Marec J; Maillard F; Nisand I;
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Dec; 26(7):707-12. PubMed ID: 16273595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Transvaginal sonographic measurement of cervical length vs. Bishop score in labor induction at term: tolerability and prediction of Cesarean delivery.
Tan PC; Vallikkannu N; Suguna S; Quek KF; Hassan J
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2007 May; 29(5):568-73. PubMed ID: 17444553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [The value of intravaginal ultrasonography of the cervix uteri for evaluation of the risk of premature labor].
Goffinet F; Rozenberg P; Kayem G; Perdu M; Philippe HJ; Nisand I
J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 1997; 26(6):623-9. PubMed ID: 9453980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Prediction of preterm delivery by sonographic estimation of cervical length.
Botsis D; Papagianni V; Vitoratos N; Makrakis E; Aravantinos L; Creatsas G
Biol Neonate; 2005; 88(1):42-5. PubMed ID: 15767741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Prediction of risk for preterm delivery by ultrasonographic measurement of cervical length.
Andersen HF; Nugent CE; Wanty SD; Hayashi RH
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1990 Sep; 163(3):859-67. PubMed ID: 2206073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cervical ultrasonography compared with manual examination as a predictor of preterm delivery.
Berghella V; Tolosa JE; Kuhlman K; Weiner S; Bolognese RJ; Wapner RJ
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Oct; 177(4):723-30. PubMed ID: 9369810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Transvaginal sonography of the uterine cervix prior to labor induction.
Gabriel R; Darnaud T; Chalot F; Gonzalez N; Leymarie F; Quereux C
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2002 Mar; 19(3):254-7. PubMed ID: 11896946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of digital and ultrasonographic examination of the cervix in predicting time interval from induction to delivery in women with a low Bishop score.
Rozenberg P; Chevret S; Chastang C; Ville Y
BJOG; 2005 Feb; 112(2):192-6. PubMed ID: 15663583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Is sonographic assessment of cervical length better than digital examination in screening for preterm delivery in a low-risk population?
Matijevic R; Grgic O; Vasilj O
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2006; 85(11):1342-7. PubMed ID: 17091415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Transvaginal cervical length measurement; its current application in a regional Australian level II maternity hospital.
van Rijswijk S; Nagtegaal MJ; McGavin S; Dekker G
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2005 Oct; 45(5):418-23. PubMed ID: 16171480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Preinduction sonographic measurement of cervical length in the prediction of successful induction of labor.
Pandis GK; Papageorghiou AT; Ramanathan VG; Thompson MO; Nicolaides KH
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2001 Dec; 18(6):623-8. PubMed ID: 11844202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Sonographic measurement of cervical length and fetal fibronectin testing in threatened preterm labor.
Tsoi E; Akmal S; Geerts L; Jeffery B; Nicolaides KH
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Apr; 27(4):368-72. PubMed ID: 16526097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of threatened preterm delivery by transvaginal ultrasonographic measurement of cervical length.
Murakawa H; Utumi T; Hasegawa I; Tanaka K; Fuzimori R
Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Nov; 82(5):829-32. PubMed ID: 8414332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Preterm labor: Reproducibility of detection test of PAMG-1 before and after digital examination, and transvaginal ultrasound cervical length].
Werlen S; Raia T; Di Bartolomeo A; Chauleur C
Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2015 Oct; 43(10):640-5. PubMed ID: 26234685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Use of cervical ultrasonography in prediction of spontaneous preterm birth in twin gestations.
Guzman ER; Walters C; O'reilly-Green C; Kinzler WL; Waldron R; Nigam J; Vintzileos AM
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2000 Nov; 183(5):1103-7. PubMed ID: 11084549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
