649 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15474819)
1. Functional vision after cataract removal with multifocal and accommodating intraocular lens implantation: prospective comparative evaluation of Array multifocal and 1CU accommodating lenses.
Claoué C
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2004 Oct; 30(10):2088-91. PubMed ID: 15474819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparing the 1CU accommodative, multifocal, and monofocal intraocular lenses: a randomized trial.
Harman FE; Maling S; Kampougeris G; Langan L; Khan I; Lee N; Bloom PA
Ophthalmology; 2008 Jun; 115(6):993-1001.e2. PubMed ID: 18031818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Quality of vision after AMO Array multifocal intraocular lens implantation.
Sen HN; Sarikkola AU; Uusitalo RJ; Laatikainen L
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2004 Dec; 30(12):2483-93. PubMed ID: 15617914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Near vision restoration with refractive lens exchange and pseudoaccommodating and multifocal refractive and diffractive intraocular lenses: comparative clinical study.
Alió JL; Tavolato M; De la Hoz F; Claramonte P; Rodríguez-Prats JL; Galal A
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2004 Dec; 30(12):2494-503. PubMed ID: 15617915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. One-year outcomes with new-generation multifocal intraocular lenses.
Cillino S; Casuccio A; Di Pace F; Morreale R; Pillitteri F; Cillino G; Lodato G
Ophthalmology; 2008 Sep; 115(9):1508-16. PubMed ID: 18538402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Early visual results with the 1CU accommodating intraocular lens.
Dogru M; Honda R; Omoto M; Toda I; Fujishima H; Arai H; Matsuyama M; Nishijima S; Hida Y; Yagi Y; Tsubota K
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2005 May; 31(5):895-902. PubMed ID: 15975453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of 6-month results of implantation of the 1CU accommodative intraocular lens with conventional intraocular lenses.
Küchle M; Seitz B; Langenbucher A; Gusek-Schneider GC; Martus P; Nguyen NX;
Ophthalmology; 2004 Feb; 111(2):318-24. PubMed ID: 15019382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Visual function after monocular implantation of apodized diffractive multifocal or single-piece monofocal intraocular lens Randomized prospective comparison.
Zhao G; Zhang J; Zhou Y; Hu L; Che C; Jiang N
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2010 Feb; 36(2):282-5. PubMed ID: 20152611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Synchrony dual-optic accommodating intraocular lens. Part 2: pilot clinical evaluation.
Ossma IL; Galvis A; Vargas LG; Trager MJ; Vagefi MR; McLeod SD
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2007 Jan; 33(1):47-52. PubMed ID: 17189792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Visual performances with monofocal, accommodating, and multifocal intraocular lenses in patients with unilateral cataract.
Mesci C; Erbil HH; Olgun A; Yaylali SA
Am J Ophthalmol; 2010 Nov; 150(5):609-18. PubMed ID: 20691422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. ReSTOR intraocular lens implantation in cataract surgery: quality of vision.
Chiam PJ; Chan JH; Aggarwal RK; Kasaby S
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2006 Sep; 32(9):1459-63. PubMed ID: 16931256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [The clinical efficacy of accommodative intraocular lens and multifocal intraocular lens in pseudophakic after phacoemulsification].
Xu M; Li WS; Zhao YE; Wang QM
Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 2007 Feb; 43(2):104-7. PubMed ID: 17459238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Visual outcomes with a single-optic accommodating intraocular lens and a low-addition-power rotational asymmetric multifocal intraocular lens.
Alió JL; Plaza-Puche AB; Montalban R; Javaloy J
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2012 Jun; 38(6):978-85. PubMed ID: 22624896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Visual outcomes after accommodating intraocular lens implantation.
Macsai MS; Padnick-Silver L; Fontes BM
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2006 Apr; 32(4):628-33. PubMed ID: 16698485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Accommodation in pseudophakic eyes with the 1CU accommodative intraocular lens].
Wang J; Fu J; Wang NL; Kang HJ; Yang WL
Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 2005 Sep; 41(9):807-11. PubMed ID: 16191347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Prospective randomised double-masked trial of bilateral multifocal, bifocal or monofocal intraocular lenses.
Leyland MD; Langan L; Goolfee F; Lee N; Bloom PA
Eye (Lond); 2002 Jul; 16(4):481-90. PubMed ID: 12101459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Functional vision with bilateral ReZoom and ReSTOR intraocular lenses 6 months after cataract surgery.
Chiam PJ; Chan JH; Haider SI; Karia N; Kasaby H; Aggarwal RK
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2007 Dec; 33(12):2057-61. PubMed ID: 18053904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A prospective comparative study of the AMO ARRAY zonal-progressive multifocal silicone intraocular lens and a monofocal intraocular lens.
Steinert RF; Aker BL; Trentacost DJ; Smith PJ; Tarantino N
Ophthalmology; 1999 Jul; 106(7):1243-55. PubMed ID: 10406601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Visual performance of patients with bilateral vs combination Crystalens, ReZoom, and ReSTOR intraocular lens implants.
Pepose JS; Qazi MA; Davies J; Doane JF; Loden JC; Sivalingham V; Mahmoud AM
Am J Ophthalmol; 2007 Sep; 144(3):347-357. PubMed ID: 17651679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Clinical evaluation of the Crystalens AT-45 accommodating intraocular lens: results of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration clinical trial.
Cumming JS; Colvard DM; Dell SJ; Doane J; Fine IH; Hoffman RS; Packer M; Slade SG
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2006 May; 32(5):812-25. PubMed ID: 16765800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
