141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15475204)
1. Stress relaxation of bone significantly affects the pull-out behavior of pedicle screws.
Inceoglu S; McLain RF; Cayli S; Kilincer C; Ferrara L
J Orthop Res; 2004 Nov; 22(6):1243-7. PubMed ID: 15475204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Stress relaxation at the bone-pedicle screw interface in human bone.
Inceoğlu S; Akbay A; McLain RF
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 May; 31(12):1321-6. PubMed ID: 16721293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A biomechanical assessment of infra-laminar hooks as an alternative to supra-laminar hooks in thoracolumbar fixation.
Murakami H; Tsai KJ; Attallah-Wasif ES; Yamazaki K; Shimamura T; Hutton WC
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Apr; 31(9):967-71. PubMed ID: 16641771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Screw design alters the effects of stress relaxation on pullout.
Inceoğlu S; Kilinçer C; McLain RF
Biomed Mater Eng; 2008; 18(2):53-60. PubMed ID: 18408256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Primary pedicle screw augmentation in osteoporotic lumbar vertebrae: biomechanical analysis of pedicle fixation strength.
Burval DJ; McLain RF; Milks R; Inceoglu S
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 May; 32(10):1077-83. PubMed ID: 17471088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Axial cyclic behavior of the bone-screw interface.
Inceoğlu S; Ehlert M; Akbay A; McLain RF
Med Eng Phys; 2006 Nov; 28(9):888-93. PubMed ID: 16458568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A biomechanical analysis of the self-retaining pedicle hook device in posterior spinal fixation.
van Laar W; Meester RJ; Smit TH; van Royen BJ
Eur Spine J; 2007 Aug; 16(8):1209-14. PubMed ID: 17203270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Comparison of the pull-out strengths of three different screws in pedicular screw revisions: a biomechanical study].
Esenkaya I; Denizhan Y; Kaygusuz MA; Yetmez M; Keleştemur MH
Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc; 2006; 40(1):72-81. PubMed ID: 16648682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Pedicle screw fixation strength: pullout versus insertional torque.
Inceoglu S; Ferrara L; McLain RF
Spine J; 2004; 4(5):513-8. PubMed ID: 15363421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cortical bone trajectory for lumbar pedicle screws.
Santoni BG; Hynes RA; McGilvray KC; Rodriguez-Canessa G; Lyons AS; Henson MA; Womack WJ; Puttlitz CM
Spine J; 2009 May; 9(5):366-73. PubMed ID: 18790684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Hydroxyapatite-coating of pedicle screws improves resistance against pull-out force in the osteoporotic canine lumbar spine model: a pilot study.
Hasegawa T; Inufusa A; Imai Y; Mikawa Y; Lim TH; An HS
Spine J; 2005; 5(3):239-43. PubMed ID: 15863077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Mechanical and histological analysis of bone-pedicle screw interface in vivo: titanium versus stainless steel.
Sun C; Huang G; Christensen FB; Dalstra M; Overgaard S; Bünger C
Chin Med J (Engl); 1999 May; 112(5):456-60. PubMed ID: 11593519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A biomechanical study of intrapeduncular screw fixation in the lumbosacral spine.
Zindrick MR; Wiltse LL; Widell EH; Thomas JC; Holland WR; Field BT; Spencer CW
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1986 Feb; (203):99-112. PubMed ID: 3956001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Biomechanical comparison of anatomic trajectory pedicle screw versus injectable calcium sulfate graft-augmented pedicle screw for salvage in cadaveric thoracic bone.
Derincek A; Wu C; Mehbod A; Transfeldt EE
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2006 Jun; 19(4):286-91. PubMed ID: 16778665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cement augmentation of vertebral screws enhances the interface strength between interbody device and vertebral body.
Tan JS; Bailey CS; Dvorak MF; Fisher CG; Cripton PA; Oxland TR
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Feb; 32(3):334-41. PubMed ID: 17268265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [A comparative analysis of Socon CS and Socon pedicle screws in view of their use for treatment of osteoporotic fractures of the thoracolumbal spine--a biomechanical study].
Janů I; Kočiš J; Návrat T; Florian Z; Wendsche P
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2011; 78(4):334-8. PubMed ID: 21888844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Which is the preferred revision technique for loosened iliac screw? A novel technique of boring cement injection from the outer cortical shell.
Yu BS; Yang ZK; Li ZM; Zeng LW; Wang LB; Lu WW
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2011 Aug; 24(6):E49-56. PubMed ID: 21685804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Neurocentral synchondrosis fracture in immature spines associated with pedicle screw type fixation devices.
Sairyo K; Scifert J; Goel VK; Grosland N; Grobler LJ
J Spinal Disord; 1998 Apr; 11(2):142-5. PubMed ID: 9588471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Mechanical performance of cylindrical and dual core pedicle screws in calf and human vertebrae.
Lill CA; Schneider E; Goldhahn J; Haslemann A; Zeifang F
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2006 Dec; 126(10):686-94. PubMed ID: 16865403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cervical pedicle screws vs. lateral mass screws: uniplanar fatigue analysis and residual pullout strengths.
Johnston TL; Karaikovic EE; Lautenschlager EP; Marcu D
Spine J; 2006; 6(6):667-72. PubMed ID: 17088197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
