194 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15475420)
61. Bias correction of two-state latent Markov process parameter estimates under misclassification.
Rosychuk RJ; Thompson ME
Stat Med; 2003 Jun; 22(12):2035-55. PubMed ID: 12802821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
62. A preference-based measure for test performance with an application to prenatal diagnostics.
Felder S; Robra BP
Stat Med; 2006 Nov; 25(21):3696-706. PubMed ID: 16345129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
63. Semiparametric estimation of time-dependent ROC curves for longitudinal marker data.
Zheng Y; Heagerty PJ
Biostatistics; 2004 Oct; 5(4):615-32. PubMed ID: 15475423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
64. The agreement chart as an alternative to the receiver-operating characteristic curve for diagnostic tests.
Bangdiwala SI; Haedo AS; Natal ML; Villaveces A
J Clin Epidemiol; 2008 Sep; 61(9):866-74. PubMed ID: 18687288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
65. Equivalence of binormal likelihood-ratio and bi-chi-squared ROC curve models.
Hillis SL
Stat Med; 2016 May; 35(12):2031-57. PubMed ID: 26608405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
66. A bivariate contaminated binormal model for robust fitting of proper ROC curves to a pair of correlated, possibly degenerate, ROC datasets.
Zhai X; Chakraborty DP
Med Phys; 2017 Jun; 44(6):2207-2222. PubMed ID: 28382718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
67. Recent advances in observer performance methodology: jackknife free-response ROC (JAFROC).
Chakraborty DP
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):26-31. PubMed ID: 15933077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
68. Quantitative assessment of tumour extraction from dermoscopy images and evaluation of computer-based extraction methods for an automatic melanoma diagnostic system.
Iyatomi H; Oka H; Saito M; Miyake A; Kimoto M; Yamagami J; Kobayashi S; Tanikawa A; Hagiwara M; Ogawa K; Argenziano G; Soyer HP; Tanaka M
Melanoma Res; 2006 Apr; 16(2):183-90. PubMed ID: 16567974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
69. Comparing two diagnostic tests against the same "gold standard" in the same sample.
Bloch DA
Biometrics; 1997 Mar; 53(1):73-85. PubMed ID: 9147604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
70. Likelihood methods for regression models with expensive variables missing by design.
Zhao Y; Lawless JF; McLeish DL
Biom J; 2009 Feb; 51(1):123-36. PubMed ID: 19197954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
71. Distribution-free ROC analysis using binary regression techniques.
Alonzo TA; Pepe MS
Biostatistics; 2002 Sep; 3(3):421-32. PubMed ID: 12933607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
72. Jackknife empirical likelihood confidence regions for the evaluation of continuous-scale diagnostic tests with verification bias.
Wang B; Qin G
Stat Methods Med Res; 2016 Oct; 25(5):2120-2137. PubMed ID: 24368764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
73. Meta-analysis methods for diagnostic accuracy.
Begg CB
J Clin Epidemiol; 2008 Nov; 61(11):1081-2; discussion 1083-4. PubMed ID: 19208369
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
74. Smooth non-parametric receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves for continuous diagnostic tests.
Zou KH; Hall WJ; Shapiro DE
Stat Med; 1997 Oct; 16(19):2143-56. PubMed ID: 9330425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
75. Sample size determination for diagnostic accuracy studies involving binormal ROC curve indices.
Obuchowski NA; McClish DK
Stat Med; 1997 Jul; 16(13):1529-42. PubMed ID: 9249923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
76. Comparison of the likelihood ratios of two binary diagnostic tests in paired designs.
Nofuentes JA; Del Castillo Jde D
Stat Med; 2007 Sep; 26(22):4179-201. PubMed ID: 17357992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
77. A model free approach to combining biomarkers.
Pfeiffer RM; Bur E
Biom J; 2008 Aug; 50(4):558-70. PubMed ID: 18663762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
78. Tests of equivalence and non-inferiority for diagnostic accuracy based on the paired areas under ROC curves.
Liu JP; Ma MC; Wu CY; Tai JY
Stat Med; 2006 Apr; 25(7):1219-38. PubMed ID: 16158400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
79. Generalized linear mixed models for multi-reader multi-case studies of diagnostic tests.
Liu W; Pantoja-Galicia N; Zhang B; Kotz RM; Pennello G; Zhang H; Jacob J; Zhang Z
Stat Methods Med Res; 2017 Jun; 26(3):1373-1388. PubMed ID: 25847911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
80. Non-homogeneous models of sequence evolution in the Bio++ suite of libraries and programs.
Dutheil J; Boussau B
BMC Evol Biol; 2008 Sep; 8():255. PubMed ID: 18808672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
