BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

194 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15475420)

  • 81. Non-homogeneous models of sequence evolution in the Bio++ suite of libraries and programs.
    Dutheil J; Boussau B
    BMC Evol Biol; 2008 Sep; 8():255. PubMed ID: 18808672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 82. The partial area under the summary ROC curve.
    Walter SD
    Stat Med; 2005 Jul; 24(13):2025-40. PubMed ID: 15900606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 83. Slopes of a receiver operating characteristic curve and likelihood ratios for a diagnostic test.
    Choi BC
    Am J Epidemiol; 1998 Dec; 148(11):1127-32. PubMed ID: 9850136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 84. Profile-likelihood inference for highly accurate diagnostic tests.
    Tsimikas JV; Bosch RJ; Coull BA; El Barmi H
    Biometrics; 2002 Dec; 58(4):946-56. PubMed ID: 12495149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 85. Bayesian ROC curve estimation under verification bias.
    Gu J; Ghosal S; Kleiner DE
    Stat Med; 2014 Dec; 33(29):5081-96. PubMed ID: 25269427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 86. Optimum binary cut-off threshold of a diagnostic test: comparison of different methods using Monte Carlo technique.
    Reibnegger G; Schrabmair W
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2014 Nov; 14():99. PubMed ID: 25421000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 87. A comparison of parametric and nonparametric approaches to ROC analysis of quantitative diagnostic tests.
    Hajian-Tilaki KO; Hanley JA; Joseph L; Collet JP
    Med Decis Making; 1997; 17(1):94-102. PubMed ID: 8994156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 88. Determining the area under the ROC curve for a binary diagnostic test.
    Cantor SB; Kattan MW
    Med Decis Making; 2000; 20(4):468-70. PubMed ID: 11059479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 89. Comparing the areas under two correlated ROC curves: parametric and non-parametric approaches.
    Molodianovitch K; Faraggi D; Reiser B
    Biom J; 2006 Aug; 48(5):745-57. PubMed ID: 17094340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 90. Least squares regression methods for clustered ROC data with discrete covariates.
    Tang LL; Zhang W; Li Q; Ye X; Chan L
    Biom J; 2016 Jul; 58(4):747-65. PubMed ID: 26848938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 91. Adjusting for non-ignorable verification bias in clinical studies for Alzheimer's disease.
    Zhou XH; Castelluccio P
    Stat Med; 2004 Jan; 23(2):221-30. PubMed ID: 14716724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 92. ROC curve analysis for biomarkers based on pooled assessments.
    Faraggi D; Reiser B; Schisterman EF
    Stat Med; 2003 Aug; 22(15):2515-27. PubMed ID: 12872306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 93. "Proper" Binormal ROC Curves: Theory and Maximum-Likelihood Estimation.
    Metz CE; Pan X
    J Math Psychol; 1999 Mar; 43(1):1-33. PubMed ID: 10069933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 94. A model for adjusting for nonignorable verification bias in estimation of the ROC curve and its area with likelihood-based approach.
    Liu D; Zhou XH
    Biometrics; 2010 Dec; 66(4):1119-28. PubMed ID: 20222937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 95. Maximizing an ROC-type measure via linear combination of markers when the gold reference is continuous.
    Chang YC
    Stat Med; 2013 May; 32(11):1893-903. PubMed ID: 22972679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 96. A nonparametric maximum likelihood estimator for the receiver operating characteristic curve area in the presence of verification bias.
    Zhou XH
    Biometrics; 1996 Mar; 52(1):299-305. PubMed ID: 8934599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 97. Measurement error and confidence intervals for ROC curves.
    Tosteson TD; Buonaccorsi JP; Demidenko E; Wells WA
    Biom J; 2005 Aug; 47(4):409-16. PubMed ID: 16161800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 98. Interval estimation for the difference in paired areas under the ROC curves in the absence of a gold standard test.
    Hsieh HN; Su HY; Zhou XH
    Stat Med; 2009 Nov; 28(25):3108-23. PubMed ID: 19691022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 99. Statistical comparison of two ROC-curve estimates obtained from partially-paired datasets.
    Metz CE; Herman BA; Roe CA
    Med Decis Making; 1998; 18(1):110-21. PubMed ID: 9456215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 100. Understanding diagnostic tests. Part 3.
    Ferreira JC; Patino CM
    J Bras Pneumol; 2018; 44(1):4. PubMed ID: 29538535
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.