These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1547553)

  • 1. Comparing the power of quality-control rules to detect persistent increases in random error.
    Parvin CA
    Clin Chem; 1992 Mar; 38(3):364-9. PubMed ID: 1547553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparing the power of quality-control rules to detect persistent systematic error.
    Parvin CA
    Clin Chem; 1992 Mar; 38(3):358-63. PubMed ID: 1547552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Selecting Statistical Quality Control Procedures for Limiting the Impact of Increases in Analytical Random Error on Patient Safety.
    Yago M
    Clin Chem; 2017 May; 63(5):1022-1030. PubMed ID: 28302731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Choosing quality-control systems to detect maximum clinically allowable analytical errors.
    Linnet K
    Clin Chem; 1989 Feb; 35(2):284-8. PubMed ID: 2914374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. New insight into the comparative power of quality-control rules that use control observations within a single analytical run.
    Parvin CA
    Clin Chem; 1993 Mar; 39(3):440-7. PubMed ID: 8448854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Influence of a between-run component of variation, choice of control limits, and shape of error distribution on the performance characteristics of rules for internal quality control.
    Westgard JO; Falk H; Groth T
    Clin Chem; 1979 Mar; 25(3):394-400. PubMed ID: 262178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A tool for the design and evaluation of alternative quality-control procedures.
    Hatjimihail AT
    Clin Chem; 1992 Feb; 38(2):204-10. PubMed ID: 1541001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Estimating the performance characteristics of quality-control procedures when error persists until detection.
    Parvin CA
    Clin Chem; 1991 Oct; 37(10 Pt 1):1720-4. PubMed ID: 1914171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Design and evaluation of statistical control procedures: applications of a computer "quality control simulator" program.
    Westgard JO; Groth T
    Clin Chem; 1981 Sep; 27(9):1536-45. PubMed ID: 7261331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Performance characteristics of rules for internal quality control: probabilities for false rejection and error detection.
    Westgard JO; Groth T; Aronsson T; Falk H; de Verdier CH
    Clin Chem; 1977 Oct; 23(10):1857-67. PubMed ID: 902411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of analytical run length on quality-control (QC) performance and the QC planning process.
    Parvin CA; Gronowski AM
    Clin Chem; 1997 Nov; 43(11):2149-54. PubMed ID: 9365401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Moving standard deviation and moving sum of outliers as quality tools for monitoring analytical precision.
    Liu J; Tan CH; Badrick T; Loh TP
    Clin Biochem; 2018 Feb; 52():112-116. PubMed ID: 29107011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Mean and variance rules are more powerful or selective than quality control rules based on individual values.
    Linnet K
    Eur J Clin Chem Clin Biochem; 1991 Jul; 29(7):417-24. PubMed ID: 1932361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Quality-control (QC) performance measures and the QC planning process.
    Parvin CA
    Clin Chem; 1997 Apr; 43(4):602-7. PubMed ID: 9105260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Multirule quality control procedures.
    Carey RN
    Ann Ist Super Sanita; 1991; 27(3):419-25. PubMed ID: 1809061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. European specifications for imprecision and inaccuracy compared with operating specifications that assure the quality required by US CLIA proficiency-testing criteria.
    Westgard JO; Seehafer JJ; Barry PL
    Clin Chem; 1994 Jul; 40(7 Pt 1):1228-32. PubMed ID: 8013091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of quality-control rules used in clinical chemistry laboratories.
    Bishop J; Nix AB
    Clin Chem; 1993 Aug; 39(8):1638-49. PubMed ID: 8353950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Selection of medically useful quality-control procedures for individual tests done in a multitest analytical system.
    Koch DD; Oryall JJ; Quam EF; Feldbruegge DH; Dowd DE; Barry PL; Westgard JO
    Clin Chem; 1990 Feb; 36(2):230-3. PubMed ID: 2302766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Error models and quality control performance.
    Chiecchio A; Malvano R
    Eur J Clin Chem Clin Biochem; 1996 May; 34(5):423-30. PubMed ID: 8790978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Computer evaluation of statistical procedures, and a new quality-control statistical procedure.
    Blum AS
    Clin Chem; 1985 Feb; 31(2):206-12. PubMed ID: 3967350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.