122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15475668)
1. Effects of individual and family functioning on interest in genetic testing.
Bowen DJ; Bourcier E; Press N; Lewis FM; Burke W
Community Genet; 2004; 7(1):25-32. PubMed ID: 15475668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Perceptions of genetic testing for cancer predisposition among Ashkenazi Jewish women.
Lewis MJ; Peterson SK
Community Genet; 2007; 10(2):72-81. PubMed ID: 17380056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Men at risk of being a mutation carrier for hereditary breast/ovarian cancer: an exploration of attitudes and psychological functioning during genetic testing.
Lodder L; Frets PG; Trijsburg RW; Tibben A; Meijers-Heijboer EJ; Duivenvoorden HJ; Wagner A; van Der Meer CA; Devilee P; Cornelisse CJ; Niermeijer MF
Eur J Hum Genet; 2001 Jul; 9(7):492-500. PubMed ID: 11464240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Differences between women who pursued genetic testing for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer and their at-risk relatives who did not.
Katapodi MC; Northouse L; Pierce P; Milliron KJ; Liu G; Merajver SD
Oncol Nurs Forum; 2011 Sep; 38(5):572-81. PubMed ID: 21875844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Implications of living with a strong family history of breast cancer.
Maheu C
Can J Nurs Res; 2009 Jun; 41(2):100-12. PubMed ID: 19650516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Women's interest in genetic testing for breast cancer risk: the influence of sociodemographics and knowledge.
Bottorff JL; Ratner PA; Balneaves LG; Richardson CG; McCullum M; Hack T; Chalmers K; Buxton J
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2002 Jan; 11(1):89-95. PubMed ID: 11815405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The meaning of risk to first degree relatives of women with breast cancer.
Sheinfeld Gorin S; Albert SM
Women Health; 2003; 37(3):97-117. PubMed ID: 12839310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Acceptance for preventive genetic testing and prophylactic surgery in women with a family history of breast and gynaecological cancers.
Ackermann S; Lux MP; Fasching PA; Strissl P; Renner SP; Poehls U; Bender HG; Beckmann MW
Eur J Cancer Prev; 2006 Dec; 15(6):474-9. PubMed ID: 17106324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Healthy women with a family history of breast cancer: impact of a tailored genetic counseling intervention on risk perception, knowledge, and menopausal therapy decision making.
Matloff ET; Moyer A; Shannon KM; Niendorf KB; Col NF
J Womens Health (Larchmt); 2006 Sep; 15(7):843-56. PubMed ID: 16999640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cancer patients who experienced diagnostic genetic testing for cancer susceptibility: reactions and behavior after the disclosure of a positive test result.
Bonadona V; Saltel P; Desseigne F; Mignotte H; Saurin JC; Wang Q; Sinilnikova O; Giraud S; Freyer G; Plauchu H; Puisieux A; Lasset C
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2002 Jan; 11(1):97-104. PubMed ID: 11815406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A literature review of the psychological impact of genetic testing on breast cancer patients.
Schlich-Bakker KJ; ten Kroode HF; Ausems MG
Patient Educ Couns; 2006 Jul; 62(1):13-20. PubMed ID: 16242293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Psychological adjustment among male partners in response to women's breast/ovarian cancer risk: a theoretical review of the literature.
Sherman KA; Kasparian NA; Mireskandari S
Psychooncology; 2010 Jan; 19(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 19472298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Family system characteristics and psychological adjustment to cancer susceptibility genetic testing: a prospective study.
van Oostrom I; Meijers-Heijboer H; Duivenvoorden HJ; Bröcker-Vriends AH; van Asperen CJ; Sijmons RH; Seynaeve C; van Gool AR; Klijn JG; Tibben A
Clin Genet; 2007 Jan; 71(1):35-42. PubMed ID: 17204044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Breast cancer attitudes, knowledge, and screening behavior in women with and without a family history of breast cancer.
Hailey BJ; Carter CL; Burnett DR
Health Care Women Int; 2000 Dec; 21(8):701-15. PubMed ID: 11813762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Participation in breast cancer susceptibility testing protocols: influence of recruitment source, altruism, and family involvement on women's decisions.
Geller G; Doksum T; Bernhardt BA; Metz SA
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 1999 Apr; 8(4 Pt 2):377-83. PubMed ID: 10207643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Who's to blame? Accounts of genetic responsibility and blame among Ashkenazi Jewish women at risk of BRCA breast cancer.
Mozersky J
Sociol Health Illn; 2012 Jun; 34(5):776-90. PubMed ID: 22257279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Interest and attitudes of patients, cancer physicians, medical students and cancer researchers towards a spectrum of genetic tests relevant to breast cancer patients.
Ngoi N; Lee SC; Hartman M; Khin LW; Wong A
Breast; 2013 Feb; 22(1):47-52. PubMed ID: 22560561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of individuals opting for BRCA1/2 or HNPCC genetic susceptibility testing with regard to coping, illness perceptions, illness experiences, family system characteristics and hereditary cancer distress.
van Oostrom I; Meijers-Heijboer H; Duivenvoorden HJ; Bröcker-Vriends AH; van Asperen CJ; Sijmons RH; Seynaeve C; Van Gool AR; Klijn JG; Tibben A
Patient Educ Couns; 2007 Jan; 65(1):58-68. PubMed ID: 16872788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Psychosocial issues following a positive result of genetic testing for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations: findings from a focus group and a needs-assessment survey.
Di Prospero LS; Seminsky M; Honeyford J; Doan B; Franssen E; Meschino W; Chart P; Warner E
CMAJ; 2001 Apr; 164(7):1005-9. PubMed ID: 11314429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Attitude towards genetic testing for breast cancer susceptibility: a comparison of affected and unaffected women.
Bruno M; Digennaro M; Tommasi S; Stea B; Danese T; Schittulli F; Paradiso A
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl); 2010 May; 19(3):360-8. PubMed ID: 19912305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
