438 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15476300)
1. Intraobserver and interobserver reproducibility of fetal biometry.
Perni SC; Chervenak FA; Kalish RB; Magherini-Rothe S; Predanic M; Streltzoff J; Skupski DW
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Nov; 24(6):654-8. PubMed ID: 15476300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Intra- and interobserver reproducibility study of early fetal growth parameters.
Verburg BO; Mulder PG; Hofman A; Jaddoe VW; Witteman JC; Steegers EA
Prenat Diagn; 2008 Apr; 28(4):323-31. PubMed ID: 18324617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Fetal biometry by an inexperienced operator using two- and three-dimensional ultrasound.
Yang F; Leung KY; Lee YP; Chan HY; Tang MH
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2010 May; 35(5):566-71. PubMed ID: 20183864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Measurement error for ultrasound fetal biometry performed by paramedics in rural Bangladesh.
Neufeld LM; Wagatsuma Y; Hussain R; Begum M; Frongillo EA
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Oct; 34(4):387-94. PubMed ID: 19504627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Volumetric (3D) imaging reduces inter- and intraobserver variation of fetal biometry measurements.
Chan LW; Fung TY; Leung TY; Sahota DS; Lau TK
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Apr; 33(4):447-52. PubMed ID: 19277977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Common fetal measurements: a comparison between ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging.
Parkar AP; Olsen ØE; Gjelland K; Kiserud T; Rosendahl K
Acta Radiol; 2010 Feb; 51(1):85-91. PubMed ID: 20088642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Biometry and fetal weight estimation by two-dimensional and three-dimensional ultrasonography: an intraobserver and interobserver reliability and agreement study.
Lima JC; Miyague AH; Filho FM; Nastri CO; Martins WP
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2012 Aug; 40(2):186-93. PubMed ID: 22102507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Intra- and interobserver variability in fetal ultrasound measurements.
Sarris I; Ioannou C; Chamberlain P; Ohuma E; Roseman F; Hoch L; Altman DG; Papageorghiou AT;
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2012 Mar; 39(3):266-73. PubMed ID: 22535628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Inter-observer variability in fetal biometric measurements.
Kilani R; Aleyadeh W; Atieleh LA; Al Suleimat AM; Khadra M; Hawamdeh HM
Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Feb; 57(1):32-39. PubMed ID: 29458900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Reference charts and equations of Korean fetal biometry.
Jung SI; Lee YH; Moon MH; Song MJ; Min JY; Kim JA; Park JH; Yang JH; Kim MY; Chung JH; Cho JY; Kim KG
Prenat Diagn; 2007 Jun; 27(6):545-51. PubMed ID: 17431930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Influence of maternal body mass index on interobserver variability of fetal ultrasound biometry and amniotic-fluid assessment in late pregnancy.
Martins JG; Kawakita T; Gurganus M; Baraki D; Jain P; Papageorghiou AT; Abuhamad AZ
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Dec; 58(6):892-899. PubMed ID: 33836119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Quality control of ultrasound for fetal biometry: results from the INTERGROWTH-21
Cavallaro A; Ash ST; Napolitano R; Wanyonyi S; Ohuma EO; Molloholli M; Sande J; Sarris I; Ioannou C; Norris T; Donadono V; Carvalho M; Purwar M; Barros FC; Jaffer YA; Bertino E; Pang R; Gravett MG; Salomon LJ; Noble JA; Altman DG; Papageorghiou AT
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Sep; 52(3):332-339. PubMed ID: 28718938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Fetal biometry: a comparison between experienced sonographers and automated measurements.
Zalud I; Good S; Carneiro G; Georgescu B; Aoki K; Green L; Shahrestani F; Okumura R
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2009 Jan; 22(1):43-50. PubMed ID: 19165678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Obstetric ultrasound scanning by local health workers in a refugee camp on the Thai-Burmese border.
Rijken MJ; Lee SJ; Boel ME; Papageorghiou AT; Visser GH; Dwell SL; Kennedy SH; Singhasivanon P; White NJ; Nosten F; McGready R
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Oct; 34(4):395-403. PubMed ID: 19790099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Determination of gestational age after the 24th week of gestation from fetal kidney length measurements.
Konje JC; Abrams KR; Bell SC; Taylor DJ
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2002 Jun; 19(6):592-7. PubMed ID: 12047540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Scientific basis for standardization of fetal head measurements by ultrasound: a reproducibility study.
Napolitano R; Donadono V; Ohuma EO; Knight CL; Wanyonyi SZ; Kemp B; Norris T; Papageorghiou AT
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Jul; 48(1):80-5. PubMed ID: 27158767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The feasibility of using 5D CNS software in obtaining standard fetal head measurements from volumes acquired by three-dimensional ultrasonography: comparison with two-dimensional ultrasound.
Rizzo G; Aiello E; Pietrolucci ME; Arduini D
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2016; 29(14):2217-22. PubMed ID: 26364724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Revisiting first-trimester fetal biometry.
Salomon LJ; Bernard JP; Duyme M; Dorion A; Ville Y
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2003 Jul; 22(1):63-6. PubMed ID: 12858306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. French fetal biometry: reference equations and comparison with other charts.
Salomon LJ; Duyme M; Crequat J; Brodaty G; Talmant C; Fries N; Althuser M
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Aug; 28(2):193-8. PubMed ID: 16570263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The sonographic assessment of twin growth discordancy.
Hill LM; Guzick D; Chenevey P; Boyles D; Nedzesky P
Obstet Gynecol; 1994 Oct; 84(4):501-4. PubMed ID: 8090383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
