These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

192 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15476558)

  • 1. Rank Difference Analysis of Microarrays (RDAM), a novel approach to statistical analysis of microarray expression profiling data.
    Martin DE; Demougin P; Hall MN; Bellis M
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2004 Oct; 5():148. PubMed ID: 15476558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Statistical monitoring of weak spots for improvement of normalization and ratio estimates in microarrays.
    Dozmorov I; Knowlton N; Tang Y; Centola M
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2004 May; 5():53. PubMed ID: 15128432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Microarray expression profiling: analysis and applications.
    Xiang Z; Yang Y; Ma X; Ding W
    Curr Opin Drug Discov Devel; 2003 May; 6(3):384-95. PubMed ID: 12833672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Key aspects of analyzing microarray gene-expression data.
    Chen JJ
    Pharmacogenomics; 2007 May; 8(5):473-82. PubMed ID: 17465711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Improving the statistical detection of regulated genes from microarray data using intensity-based variance estimation.
    Comander J; Natarajan S; Gimbrone MA; García-Cardeña G
    BMC Genomics; 2004 Feb; 5(1):17. PubMed ID: 15113402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Leveraging two-way probe-level block design for identifying differential gene expression with high-density oligonucleotide arrays.
    Barrera L; Benner C; Tao YC; Winzeler E; Zhou Y
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2004 Apr; 5():42. PubMed ID: 15099405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Compensating for unknown confounders in microarray data analysis using filtered permutations.
    Scheid S; Spang R
    J Comput Biol; 2007 Jun; 14(5):669-81. PubMed ID: 17683267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. How many replicates of arrays are required to detect gene expression changes in microarray experiments? A mixture model approach.
    Pan W; Lin J; Le CT
    Genome Biol; 2002; 3(5):research0022. PubMed ID: 12049663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. From co-expression to co-regulation: how many microarray experiments do we need?
    Yeung KY; Medvedovic M; Bumgarner RE
    Genome Biol; 2004; 5(7):R48. PubMed ID: 15239833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of a statistical equivalence test applied to microarray data.
    Qiu J; Cui X
    J Biopharm Stat; 2010 Mar; 20(2):240-66. PubMed ID: 20309757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of seven methods for producing Affymetrix expression scores based on False Discovery Rates in disease profiling data.
    Shedden K; Chen W; Kuick R; Ghosh D; Macdonald J; Cho KR; Giordano TJ; Gruber SB; Fearon ER; Taylor JM; Hanash S
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2005 Feb; 6():26. PubMed ID: 15705192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Identification of differentially expressed genes and false discovery rate in microarray studies.
    Gusnanto A; Calza S; Pawitan Y
    Curr Opin Lipidol; 2007 Apr; 18(2):187-93. PubMed ID: 17353668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Sex genes for genomic analysis in human brain: internal controls for comparison of probe level data extraction.
    Galfalvy HC; Erraji-Benchekroun L; Smyrniotopoulos P; Pavlidis P; Ellis SP; Mann JJ; Sibille E; Arango V
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2003 Sep; 4():37. PubMed ID: 12962547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Improving identification of differentially expressed genes in microarray studies using information from public databases.
    Kim RD; Park PJ
    Genome Biol; 2004; 5(9):R70. PubMed ID: 15345054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Microarrays for global expression constructed with a low redundancy set of 27,500 sequenced cDNAs representing an array of developmental stages and physiological conditions of the soybean plant.
    Vodkin LO; Khanna A; Shealy R; Clough SJ; Gonzalez DO; Philip R; Zabala G; Thibaud-Nissen F; Sidarous M; Strömvik MV; Shoop E; Schmidt C; Retzel E; Erpelding J; Shoemaker RC; Rodriguez-Huete AM; Polacco JC; Coryell V; Keim P; Gong G; Liu L; Pardinas J; Schweitzer P
    BMC Genomics; 2004 Sep; 5():73. PubMed ID: 15453914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Computational method for reducing variance with Affymetrix microarrays.
    Welle S; Brooks AI; Thornton CA
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2002 Aug; 3():23. PubMed ID: 12204100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A new outlier removal approach for cDNA microarray normalization.
    Wu Y; Yan L; Liu H; Sun H; Xie H
    Biotechniques; 2009 Aug; 47(2):691-2, 694-700. PubMed ID: 19737130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Statistical significance for hierarchical clustering in genetic association and microarray expression studies.
    Levenstien MA; Yang Y; Ott J
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2003 Dec; 4():62. PubMed ID: 14667254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Optimized LOWESS normalization parameter selection for DNA microarray data.
    Berger JA; Hautaniemi S; Järvinen AK; Edgren H; Mitra SK; Astola J
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2004 Dec; 5():194. PubMed ID: 15588297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Impact of experimental noise and annotation imprecision on data quality in microarray experiments.
    Scherer A; Dai M; Meng F
    Methods Mol Biol; 2013; 972():155-76. PubMed ID: 23385537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.