BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

413 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15477031)

  • 1. Multisensory contributions to the 3-D representation of visuotactile peripersonal space in humans: evidence from the crossmodal congruency task.
    Spence C; Pavani F; Maravita A; Holmes N
    J Physiol Paris; 2004; 98(1-3):171-89. PubMed ID: 15477031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Crossmodal congruency measures of lateral distance effects on the rubber hand illusion.
    Zopf R; Savage G; Williams MA
    Neuropsychologia; 2010 Feb; 48(3):713-25. PubMed ID: 19913040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Temporal aspects of the visuotactile congruency effect.
    Shore DI; Barnes ME; Spence C
    Neurosci Lett; 2006 Jan; 392(1-2):96-100. PubMed ID: 16213655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. On the inability to ignore touch when responding to vision in the crossmodal congruency task.
    Spence C; Walton M
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2005; 118(1-2):47-70. PubMed ID: 15627409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Assessing the influence of schematic drawings of body parts on tactile discrimination performance using the crossmodal congruency task.
    Igarashi Y; Kitagawa N; Spence C; Ichihara S
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2007 Feb; 124(2):190-208. PubMed ID: 16759624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An ERP investigation on visuotactile interactions in peripersonal and extrapersonal space: evidence for the spatial rule.
    Sambo CF; Forster B
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Aug; 21(8):1550-9. PubMed ID: 18767919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Multisensory stimulation with or without saccades: fMRI evidence for crossmodal effects on sensory-specific cortices that reflect multisensory location-congruence rather than task-relevance.
    Macaluso E; Frith CD; Driver J
    Neuroimage; 2005 Jun; 26(2):414-25. PubMed ID: 15907299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Seeing the body modulates audiotactile integration.
    Aspell JE; Lavanchy T; Lenggenhager B; Blanke O
    Eur J Neurosci; 2010 May; 31(10):1868-73. PubMed ID: 20584191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The space of senses: impaired crossmodal interactions in a patient with Balint syndrome after bilateral parietal damage.
    Valenza N; Murray MM; Ptak R; Vuilleumier P
    Neuropsychologia; 2004; 42(13):1737-48. PubMed ID: 15351624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Visuo-tactile representation of near-the-body space.
    Làdavas E; Farnè A
    J Physiol Paris; 2004; 98(1-3):161-70. PubMed ID: 15477030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Others' actions reduce crossmodal integration in peripersonal space.
    Heed T; Habets B; Sebanz N; Knoblich G
    Curr Biol; 2010 Aug; 20(15):1345-9. PubMed ID: 20619649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Vision and touch in ageing: crossmodal selective attention and visuotactile spatial interactions.
    Poliakoff E; Ashworth S; Lowe C; Spence C
    Neuropsychologia; 2006; 44(4):507-17. PubMed ID: 16098997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Sequential neural processes of tactile-visual crossmodal working memory.
    Ohara S; Lenz F; Zhou YD
    Neuroscience; 2006 Apr; 139(1):299-309. PubMed ID: 16324794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Peripersonal space around the upper and the lower limbs.
    Gherri E; Xu A; Ambron E; Sedda A
    Exp Brain Res; 2022 Aug; 240(7-8):2039-2050. PubMed ID: 35727366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Neuropsychological evidence of modular organization of the near peripersonal space.
    Farnè A; Demattè ML; Làdavas E
    Neurology; 2005 Dec; 65(11):1754-8. PubMed ID: 16344519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Grasping actions remap peripersonal space.
    Brozzoli C; Pavani F; Urquizar C; Cardinali L; Farnè A
    Neuroreport; 2009 Jul; 20(10):913-7. PubMed ID: 19512951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The representation of space near the body through touch and vision.
    Macaluso E; Maravita A
    Neuropsychologia; 2010 Feb; 48(3):782-95. PubMed ID: 19837101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Interactions of different body parts in peripersonal space: how vision of the foot influences tactile perception at the hand.
    Schicke T; Bauer F; Röder B
    Exp Brain Res; 2009 Feb; 192(4):703-15. PubMed ID: 18841353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. When far is near: ERP correlates of crossmodal spatial interactions between tactile and mirror-reflected visual stimuli.
    Sambo CF; Forster B
    Neurosci Lett; 2011 Aug; 500(1):10-5. PubMed ID: 21683122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The selective effect of the image of a hand on visuotactile interactions as assessed by performance on the crossmodal congruency task.
    Igarashi Y; Kimura Y; Spence C; Ichihara S
    Exp Brain Res; 2008 Jan; 184(1):31-8. PubMed ID: 17726605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 21.