117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15477915)
1. Looking back at the 1987 Cervical Cancer Inquiry.
Williams L
N Z Med J; 2004 Sep; 117(1202):U1084; author reply U1084. PubMed ID: 15477915
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. 'All about research'--looking back at the 1987 Cervical Cancer Inquiry.
Heslop B
N Z Med J; 2004 Aug; 117(1199):U1000. PubMed ID: 15475970
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Cervical Cancer Inquiry.
Baird T
N Z Med J; 2004 Oct; 117(1204):U1136. PubMed ID: 15505677
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. A patient's response to recent criticisms of the findings in the report of the Cervical Cancer Inquiry 1988.
Matheson C
N Z Med J; 2010 Aug; 123(1321):95-101. PubMed ID: 20927164
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Research into the Cartwright Inquiry.
Bryder L
N Z Med J; 2009 Jan; 122(1288):114-5. PubMed ID: 19182853
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. A response to Ms Sandercock and Dr Burls regarding the methods used in the analysis for our first paper 'Natural history of cervical neoplasia and risk of invasive cancer in women diagnosed with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 3'.
McCredie M
N Z Med J; 2010 Aug; 123(1321):105-7. PubMed ID: 20927168
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Reassessing Cartwright--understanding the factual record.
Bunkle P
N Z Med J; 2010 Aug; 123(1321):88-94. PubMed ID: 20927163
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. A retrospective study: response to Dr McCredie. Re: consequences in women of participating in a study of the natural history of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 3.
Bryder L
N Z Med J; 2010 Aug; 123(1321):104. PubMed ID: 20927167
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. A response to Dr Paul Patten. Re: a particular relationship.
Paul C
N Z Med J; 2010 Aug; 123(1321):102. PubMed ID: 20927165
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Science, fraud and the Baltimore case.
Bernstein J
Commentary; 1998 Dec; 106(6):40-4. PubMed ID: 15986525
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Retractions of the year.
Nat Med; 2010 Dec; 16(12):1363. PubMed ID: 21135834
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. New Zealand's cervical cytology history: implications for the control of cervical cancer.
Paul C
N Z Med J; 2004 Nov; 117(1206):U1170. PubMed ID: 15570339
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Historical aspects of cervical cancer in New Zealand: concepts and treatment up to 1941.
Chang AR
N Z Med J; 1988 Aug; 101(851):514-7. PubMed ID: 3043285
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Looking back ... The Medical Journal of Australia. Correspondence: Cervical cancer.
Med J Aust; 1983 Feb; 1(4):149. PubMed ID: 6341795
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. A medical journal editor's role in exposing an unethical research study.
Jones RW
Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Jan; 113(1):161-165. PubMed ID: 19104373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Scientific fraud].
Mamianetti A
Medicina (B Aires); 2016; 76(6):410. PubMed ID: 27959856
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. [Aristides Maltez Hospital and the control of cervical cancer in Brazil].
Lana V
Dynamis; 2014; 34(1):25-47, 5-6. PubMed ID: 24987781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [The true history of the first immortal cell lines of human origin].
Rusu V
Rev Med Chir Soc Med Nat Iasi; 2011; 115(3):633-5. PubMed ID: 22046765
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Response to the Missing Manuscript editorial.
Richardson A
N Z Med J; 2010 Aug; 123(1320):118. PubMed ID: 20720614
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Movie Review of The Immortal Life of Henrietta Lacks.
Disis MLN
JAMA; 2017 Dec; 318(24):2410-2412. PubMed ID: 29279906
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
