These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15478171)

  • 1. Response characteristics of an aquatic biomonitor used for rapid toxicity detection.
    van der Schalie WH; Shedd TR; Widder MW; Brennan LM
    J Appl Toxicol; 2004; 24(5):387-94. PubMed ID: 15478171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Blind and naive classification of toxicity by fish chromatophores.
    Mojovic L; Dierksen KP; Upson RH; Caldwell BA; Lawrence JR; Trempy JE; McFadden PN
    J Appl Toxicol; 2004; 24(5):355-61. PubMed ID: 15478185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Toxicity detection from EILATox-Oregon Workshop samples by using kinetic photobacteria measurement: the Flash method.
    Hakkila K; Lappalainen J; Virta M
    J Appl Toxicol; 2004; 24(5):349-53. PubMed ID: 15478213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of effluent toxicity as an indicator of aquatic life condition in effluent-dominated streams: a pilot study.
    Diamond J; Stribling J; Bowersox M; Latimer H
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2008 Oct; 4(4):456-70. PubMed ID: 18597571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. EILATox-Oregon Workshop: blind study evaluation of Vitotox test with genotoxic and cytotoxic sample library.
    Meriläinen J; Lampinen J
    J Appl Toxicol; 2004; 24(5):327-32. PubMed ID: 15478175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Detection of chemical threat agents in drinking water by an early warning real-time biomonitor.
    Green U; Kremer JH; Zillmer M; Moldaenke C
    Environ Toxicol; 2003 Dec; 18(6):368-74. PubMed ID: 14608606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Intra-laboratory evaluation of Microbial Assay for Risk Assessment (MARA) for potential application in the implementation of the Water Framework Directive (WFD).
    Wadhia K; Dando T; Thompson KC
    J Environ Monit; 2007 Sep; 9(9):953-8. PubMed ID: 17726555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Sensitivity evaluation of the Daphtoxkit and Thamnotoxkit microbiotests on blind samples.
    Törökné A
    J Appl Toxicol; 2004; 24(5):323-6. PubMed ID: 15478177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Safety and nutritional assessment of GM plants and derived food and feed: the role of animal feeding trials.
    EFSA GMO Panel Working Group on Animal Feeding Trials
    Food Chem Toxicol; 2008 Mar; 46 Suppl 1():S2-70. PubMed ID: 18328408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. NTP carcinogenesis studies of 2,2-bis(bromomethyl)-1,3-propanediol, nitromethane, and 1,2,3-trichloropropane (cas nos. 3296-90-0, 75-52-5, and 96-18-4) in guppies (Poecilia reticulata) and medaka (Oryzias latipes) (Waterborne Studies).
    National Toxicology Program
    Natl Toxicol Program Tech Rep Ser; 2005 Oct; (528):1-190. PubMed ID: 16362062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Biomonitoring with Gammarus pulex at the Meuse (NL), Aller (GER) and Rhine (F) rivers with the online Multispecies Freshwater Biomonitor.
    Gerhardt A; Kienle C; Allan IJ; Greenwood R; Guigues N; Fouillac AM; Mills GA; Gonzalez C
    J Environ Monit; 2007 Sep; 9(9):979-85. PubMed ID: 17726559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Use of Daphnia spp. for the ecotoxicological assessment of water quality in an agricultural watershed in South-Central Chile.
    Cooman K; Debels P; Gajardo M; Urrutia R; Barra R
    Arch Environ Contam Toxicol; 2005 Feb; 48(2):191-200. PubMed ID: 15696343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cultured neuronal networks as environmental biosensors.
    O'Shaughnessy TJ; Gray SA; Pancrazio JJ
    J Appl Toxicol; 2004; 24(5):379-85. PubMed ID: 15478174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Application of biological safety index in two Japanese watersheds using a bioassay battery.
    Wei D; Lin Z; Kameya T; Urano K; Du Y
    Chemosphere; 2008 Jul; 72(9):1303-8. PubMed ID: 18534658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Biomonitoring of cyanotoxins in two tropical reservoirs by cladoceran toxicity bioassays.
    da S Ferrão-Filho A; Soares MC; de Freitas Magalhães V; Azevedo SM
    Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 2009 Feb; 72(2):479-89. PubMed ID: 18407352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Responses of fish chromatophore-based cytosensor to a broad range of biological agents.
    Dierksen KP; Mojovic L; Caldwell BA; Preston RR; Upson R; Lawrence J; McFadden PN; Trempy JE
    J Appl Toxicol; 2004; 24(5):363-9. PubMed ID: 15478182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Combination of in vitro bioassays for the determination of cytotoxic and genotoxic potential of wastewater, surface water and drinking water samples.
    Zegura B; Heath E; Cernosa A; Filipic M
    Chemosphere; 2009 Jun; 75(11):1453-60. PubMed ID: 19307011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Methods for deriving pesticide aquatic life criteria.
    TenBrook PL; Tjeerdema RS; Hann P; Karkoski J
    Rev Environ Contam Toxicol; 2009; 199():19-109. PubMed ID: 19110939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Use of the luminescent bacterial system for the rapid assessment of aquatic toxicity.
    Bulich AA; Isenberg DL
    ISA Trans; 1981; 20(1):29-33. PubMed ID: 7251338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Responses of fathead minnows (Pimephales promelas) during life-cycle exposures to pulp mill effluents at four long-term receiving water study sites.
    Borton DL; Cook DL; Bradley WK; Philbeck RE; Dubé MG; Brown-Peterson NJ; Streblow WR
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2009 Apr; 5(2):270-82. PubMed ID: 19146231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.