293 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15478258)
1. Genetic information and the importance of context: implications for the social meaning of genetic information and individual identity.
Gatter KM
St Louis Univ Law J; 2003; 47(2):423-62. PubMed ID: 15478258
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Population-based genetic studies: informed consent and confidentiality.
Smith MJ
Santa Clara Comput High Technol Law J; 2001 Dec; 18(1):57-93. PubMed ID: 12741383
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. DNA blueprints, personhood, and genetic privacy.
Miller H
Health Matrix Clevel; 1998; 8(2):179-221. PubMed ID: 10182217
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The allure and peril of genetics exceptionalism: do we need special genetics legislation?
Suter SM
Wash Univ Law Q; 2001; 79(3):669-748. PubMed ID: 12741377
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Safeguarding human genetic privacy.
Judicature; 2003; 86(5):224. PubMed ID: 15744895
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. DNA: five distinguishing features for policy analysis.
Green RM; Thomas AM
Harv J Law Technol; 1998; 11(3):571-91. PubMed ID: 12731549
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Iceland's plan for genomics research: facts and implications.
Greely HT
Jurimetrics; 2000; 40():153-91. PubMed ID: 16295921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Misusing informed consent: a critique of limitations on research subjects' access to genetic research results.
Banks TM
Sask Law Rev; 2000; 63(2):539-80. PubMed ID: 12666671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Spider silk jeans or spider silk genes? The future of genetic testing in the workplace.
Feitshans IL
N Y Law Sch J Hum Rights; 2001; 18(1):13-49. PubMed ID: 12962108
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Ethical considerations of genetic testing.
Fleming DA
J Clin Ethics; 2002; 13(4):316-23. PubMed ID: 12793324
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Navajo Nation reconsiders ban on genetic research.
Reardon S
Nature; 2017 Oct; 550(7675):165-166. PubMed ID: 29022929
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Whose genes are they anyway?
Nelkin D; Andrews LB
Chron High Educ; 1999 May; 45():B6. PubMed ID: 14598853
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Moore 10 years later--still trying to fill the gap: creating a personal property right in genetic material.
Seeney EB
New Engl Law Rev; 1998; 32(4):1131-91. PubMed ID: 12778925
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Property rights in genetic information.
Spinello RA
Ethics Inf Technol; 2004; 6(1):29-42. PubMed ID: 16969959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Laboratory specimens and genetic privacy: evolution of legal theory.
Lewis MH
J Law Med Ethics; 2013 Mar; 41 Suppl 1():65-8. PubMed ID: 23590744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Negotiating a policy of prudent science and proactive law in the brave new world of genetic information.
Chen S
Hastings Law J; 2001 Nov; 53(1):243-63. PubMed ID: 12680379
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Genetic non-discrimination, privacy and property rights.
Stulic M
E Law; 2000 Jun; 7(2):E5. PubMed ID: 16903021
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Japan set to tighten ethics rules for genetic sampling.
Triendl R
Nature; 2000 Feb; 403(6772):819-20. PubMed ID: 10706252
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Genomic anonymity: have we already lost it?
Greenbaum D; Du J; Gerstein M
Am J Bioeth; 2008 Oct; 8(10):71-4. PubMed ID: 19003717
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Disentangling privacy from property: toward a deeper understanding of genetic privacy.
Suter SM
George Washington Law Rev; 2004 Apr; 72(4):737-814. PubMed ID: 16506342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
