These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

175 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15478438)

  • 41. Intraglottal pressures in a three-dimensional model with a non-rectangular glottal shape.
    Scherer RC; Torkaman S; Kucinschi BR; Afjeh AA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Aug; 128(2):828-38. PubMed ID: 20707452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Characterizing glottal jet turbulence.
    Alipour F; Scherer RC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2006 Feb; 119(2):1063-73. PubMed ID: 16521768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Low-dimensional models of the glottal flow incorporating viscous-inviscid interaction.
    Kaburagi T; Tanabe Y
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Jan; 125(1):391-404. PubMed ID: 19173426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Three-dimensional nature of the glottal jet.
    Triep M; Brücker C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Mar; 127(3):1537-47. PubMed ID: 20329854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Effect of inferior surface angle on the self-oscillation of a computational vocal fold model.
    Smith SL; Thomson SL
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 May; 131(5):4062-75. PubMed ID: 22559379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Normalized amplitude quotient for parametrization of the glottal flow.
    Alku P; Bäckström T; Vilkman E
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2002 Aug; 112(2):701-10. PubMed ID: 12186049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Modeling the effects of a posterior glottal opening on vocal fold dynamics with implications for vocal hyperfunction.
    Zañartu M; Galindo GE; Erath BD; Peterson SD; Wodicka GR; Hillman RE
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Dec; 136(6):3262. PubMed ID: 25480072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Regulating glottal airflow in phonation: application of the maximum power transfer theorem to a low dimensional phonation model.
    Titze IR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2002 Jan; 111(1 Pt 1):367-76. PubMed ID: 11831809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Aerodynamic transfer of energy to the vocal folds.
    Thomson SL; Mongeau L; Frankel SH
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2005 Sep; 118(3 Pt 1):1689-700. PubMed ID: 16240827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Glottal Adduction and Subglottal Pressure in Singing.
    Herbst CT; Hess M; Müller F; Švec JG; Sundberg J
    J Voice; 2015 Jul; 29(4):391-402. PubMed ID: 25944295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Influence of supraglottal structures on the glottal jet exiting a two-layer synthetic, self-oscillating vocal fold model.
    Drechsel JS; Thomson SL
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Jun; 123(6):4434-45. PubMed ID: 18537394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Vocal fold contact patterns based on normal modes of vibration.
    Smith SL; Titze IR
    J Biomech; 2018 May; 73():177-184. PubMed ID: 29680310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Influence of collision on the flow through in-vitro rigid models of the vocal folds.
    Deverge M; Pelorson X; Vilain C; Lagrée PY; Chentouf F; Willems J; Hirschberg A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Dec; 114(6 Pt 1):3354-62. PubMed ID: 14714815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Glottal volume velocity waveform characteristics in subjects with and without vocal training, related to gender, sound intensity, fundamental frequency, and age.
    Sulter AM; Wit HP
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1996 Nov; 100(5):3360-73. PubMed ID: 8914317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Effects of Vertical Glottal Duct Length on Intraglottal Pressures and Phonation Threshold Pressure in the Uniform Glottis.
    Li S; Scherer RC; Fulcher LP; Wang X; Qiu L; Wan M; Wang S
    J Voice; 2018 Jan; 32(1):8-22. PubMed ID: 28599995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Modeling coupled aerodynamics and vocal fold dynamics using immersed boundary methods.
    Duncan C; Zhai G; Scherer R
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2006 Nov; 120(5 Pt 1):2859-71. PubMed ID: 17139744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Parameterization of the glottal area, glottal flow, and vocal fold contact area.
    Titze IR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1984 Feb; 75(2):570-80. PubMed ID: 6699296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Voice production model integrating boundary-layer analysis of glottal flow and source-filter coupling.
    Kaburagi T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Mar; 129(3):1554-67. PubMed ID: 21428519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Identification of geometric parameters influencing the flow-induced vibration of a two-layer self-oscillating computational vocal fold model.
    Pickup BA; Thomson SL
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Apr; 129(4):2121-32. PubMed ID: 21476668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Pressure distributions in a static physical model of the hemilarynx: measurements and computations.
    Fulcher LP; Scherer RC; De Witt KJ; Thapa P; Bo Y; Kucinschi BR
    J Voice; 2010 Jan; 24(1):2-20. PubMed ID: 18538986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.