BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

74 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15478755)

  • 1. Part-list cuing as instructed retrieval inhibition.
    Bäuml KH; Aslan A
    Mem Cognit; 2004 Jun; 32(4):610-7. PubMed ID: 15478755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Compound cuing in free recall.
    Lohnas LJ; Kahana MJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2014 Jan; 40(1):12-24. PubMed ID: 23957364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Part-set cuing effects in spatial memory: the role of interitem associations.
    Zhao Y; Hou X; Sun Y; Gao F; Han L
    Front Psychol; 2024; 15():1364382. PubMed ID: 38836239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Assessing Boundary Conditions of the Testing Effect: On the Relative Efficacy of Covert vs. Overt Retrieval.
    Sundqvist ML; Mäntylä T; Jönsson FU
    Front Psychol; 2017; 8():1018. PubMed ID: 28680411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Collaborative encoding with a new categorization task: a contribution to collaborative memory research.
    Conte N; Pelegrina S; Padulo C; Marascia E; Fairfield B
    Psychol Res; 2024 Jun; 88(4):1339-1351. PubMed ID: 38466389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Selective restudy can reset recall of forgotten information.
    Trißl L; Bäuml KT
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2022 Dec; 29(6):2202-2210. PubMed ID: 35715684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Retrieval practice transfer effects for multielement event triplets.
    Pickering JS; Henderson LM; Horner AJ
    R Soc Open Sci; 2021 Nov; 8(11):201456. PubMed ID: 34804558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Self-paced part-list cuing.
    Wallner L; Bäuml KT
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2021 Dec; 28(6):2012-2018. PubMed ID: 34244983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Oscillatory Correlates of Selective Restudy.
    Wirth M; Pastötter B; Bäuml KT
    Front Hum Neurosci; 2021; 15():679823. PubMed ID: 34177499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Part-List Cues Hinder Familiarity but Not Recollection in Item Recognition: Behavioral and Event-Related Potential Evidence.
    Liu T; Xing M; Bai X
    Front Psychol; 2020; 11():561899. PubMed ID: 33132967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The Many Faces of Part-List Cuing-Evidence for the Interplay Between Detrimental and Beneficial Mechanisms.
    Lehmer EM; Bäuml KT
    Front Psychol; 2018; 9():701. PubMed ID: 29867667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Towards augmented human memory: Retrieval-induced forgetting and retrieval practice in an interactive, end-of-day review.
    Cinel C; Cortis Mack C; Ward G
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2018 May; 147(5):632-661. PubMed ID: 29745709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Younger and older adults' collaborative recall of shared and unshared emotional pictures.
    Barber SJ; Castrellon JJ; Opitz P; Mather M
    Mem Cognit; 2017 Jul; 45(5):716-730. PubMed ID: 28224452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparing the testing effect under blocked and mixed practice: The mnemonic benefits of retrieval practice are not affected by practice format.
    Abel M; Roediger HL
    Mem Cognit; 2017 Jan; 45(1):81-92. PubMed ID: 27464491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Initial retrieval shields against retrieval-induced forgetting.
    Racsmány M; Keresztes A
    Front Psychol; 2015; 6():657. PubMed ID: 26052293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Erroneous and veridical recall are not two sides of the same coin: Evidence from semantic distraction in free recall.
    Marsh JE; Hughes RW; Sörqvist P; Beaman CP; Jones DM
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2015 Nov; 41(6):1728-40. PubMed ID: 25938326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Why two heads apart are better than two heads together: multiple mechanisms underlie the collaborative inhibition effect in memory.
    Barber SJ; Harris CB; Rajaram S
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2015 Mar; 41(2):559-66. PubMed ID: 25068855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Noncompetitive retrieval practice causes retrieval-induced forgetting in cued recall but not in recognition.
    Grundgeiger T
    Mem Cognit; 2014 Apr; 42(3):400-8. PubMed ID: 24129441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. High working memory capacity predicts less retrieval induced forgetting.
    Mall JT; Morey CC
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(1):e52806. PubMed ID: 23326359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Retrieval-induced forgetting: dynamic effects between retrieval and restudy trials when practice is mixed.
    Dobler IM; Bäuml KH
    Mem Cognit; 2013 May; 41(4):547-57. PubMed ID: 23283807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.