These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. Repetition priming and recognition of dynamic and static chimeras. Steede LL; Hole GJ Perception; 2006; 35(10):1367-82. PubMed ID: 17214382 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Exploring the role of characteristic motion when learning new faces. Lander K; Davies R Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2007 Apr; 60(4):519-26. PubMed ID: 17455062 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A matching advantage for dynamic human faces. Thornton IM; Kourtzi Z Perception; 2002; 31(1):113-32. PubMed ID: 11922118 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A bottleneck in face identification: repetition priming from flanker images. Bindemann M; Jenkins R; Burton AM Exp Psychol; 2007; 54(3):192-201. PubMed ID: 17725160 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Recognition of moving and static faces by young infants. Otsuka Y; Konishi Y; Kanazawa S; Yamaguchi MK; Abdi H; O'Toole AJ Child Dev; 2009; 80(4):1259-71. PubMed ID: 19630907 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Best face forward: similarity effects in repetition priming of face recognition. Johnston RA; Barry C Q J Exp Psychol A; 2001 May; 54(2):383-96. PubMed ID: 11394053 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Exploring the motion advantage: evaluating the contribution of familiarity and differences in facial motion. Butcher N; Lander K Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2017 May; 70(5):919-929. PubMed ID: 26822035 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Early temporal negativity is sensitive to perceived (rather than physical) facial identity. Faerber SJ; Kaufmann JM; Schweinberger SR Neuropsychologia; 2015 Aug; 75():132-42. PubMed ID: 26013406 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The nature of semantic priming effects in the recognition of familiar people. Young AW; Flude BM; Hellawell DJ; Ellis AW Br J Psychol; 1994 Aug; 85 ( Pt 3)():393-411. PubMed ID: 7921746 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Recognizing face identity from natural and morphed smiles. Lander K; Chuang L; Wickham L Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2006 May; 59(5):801-8. PubMed ID: 16608747 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Properties of familiar face representations: Only contrast positive faces contain all information necessary for efficient recognition. Wiese H; Chan CYX; Tüttenberg SC J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2019 Sep; 45(9):1583-1598. PubMed ID: 30299131 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effects of distinctiveness, repetition and semantic priming on the recognition of face familiarity. Bruce V; Dench N; Burton M Can J Exp Psychol; 1993 Mar; 47(1):38-60. PubMed ID: 8481711 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Subliminal access to abstract face representations does not rely on attention. Harry B; Davis C; Kim J Conscious Cogn; 2012 Mar; 21(1):573-83. PubMed ID: 22200591 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The role of dynamic information in the recognition of unfamiliar faces. Christie F; Bruce V Mem Cognit; 1998 Jul; 26(4):780-90. PubMed ID: 9701969 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Lateralised repetition priming for featurally and configurally manipulated familiar faces: evidence for differentially lateralised processing mechanisms. Bourne VJ; Vladeanu M; Hole GJ Laterality; 2009 May; 14(3):287-99. PubMed ID: 18949655 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Familiarity enhances invariance of face representations in human ventral visual cortex: fMRI evidence. Eger E; Schweinberger SR; Dolan RJ; Henson RN Neuroimage; 2005 Jul; 26(4):1128-39. PubMed ID: 15961049 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Holistic processing of static and moving faces. Zhao M; Bülthoff I J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2017 Jul; 43(7):1020-1035. PubMed ID: 28191990 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]