These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

101 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15480703)

  • 1. Duration discrimination in the mouse (Mus musculus).
    Klink KB; Klump GM
    J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol; 2004 Dec; 190(12):1039-46. PubMed ID: 15480703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Detecting modulated signals in modulated noise: (I) behavioural auditory thresholds in a songbird.
    Langemann U; Klump GM
    Eur J Neurosci; 2007 Oct; 26(7):1969-78. PubMed ID: 17897400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Detection and intensity discrimination of Gaussian-shaped tone pulses as a function of duration.
    Baer T; Moore BC; Glasberg BR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1999 Oct; 106(4 Pt 1):1907-16. PubMed ID: 10530015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effect of signal duration on the underwater detection thresholds of a harbor porpoise (Phocoena phocoena) for single frequency-modulated tonal signals between 0.25 and 160 kHz.
    Kastelein RA; Hoek L; de Jong CA; Wensveen PJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Nov; 128(5):3211-22. PubMed ID: 21110616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The intensity-difference limen for Gaussian-enveloped stimuli as a function of level: tones and broadband noise.
    Nizami L; Reimer JF; Jesteadt W
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Nov; 110(5 Pt 1):2505-15. PubMed ID: 11757940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Auditory duration discrimination in the European starling (Sturnus vulgaris).
    Maier EH; Klump GM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1990 Aug; 88(2):616-21. PubMed ID: 2212285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [The thresholds of discriminating the duration of frequency-modulated signals by cats behaving freely].
    Kalmykova IV
    Zh Vyssh Nerv Deiat Im I P Pavlova; 1993; 43(4):795-9. PubMed ID: 8212882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Detecting modulated signals in modulated noise: (II) neural thresholds in the songbird forebrain.
    Bee MA; Buschermöhle M; Klump GM
    Eur J Neurosci; 2007 Oct; 26(7):1979-94. PubMed ID: 17897401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Operant methods for mouse psychoacoustics.
    Klink KB; Bendig G; Klump GM
    Behav Res Methods; 2006 Feb; 38(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 16817508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Duration selectivity of neurons in the inferior colliculus of the big brown bat: tolerance to changes in sound level.
    Fremouw T; Faure PA; Casseday JH; Covey E
    J Neurophysiol; 2005 Sep; 94(3):1869-78. PubMed ID: 15888527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Detection of signals having expected and unexpected temporal structures.
    White LJ; Carlyon RP
    Hear Res; 1997 Oct; 112(1-2):141-6. PubMed ID: 9367236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effects of ipsilateral, contralateral, and bilateral broadband noise on the mid-level hump in intensity discrimination.
    Roverud E; Strickland EA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Nov; 138(5):3245-61. PubMed ID: 26627798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of the sensitivity of prepulse inhibition of the startle reflex and operant conditioning in an auditory intensity difference limen paradigm.
    Behrens D; Klump GM
    Hear Res; 2015 Mar; 321():35-44. PubMed ID: 25580004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Discrimination of nonlinear frequency glides.
    Thyer N; Mahar D
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2006 May; 119(5 Pt 1):2929-36. PubMed ID: 16708950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Temporal processing of low-frequency sounds by seals (L).
    Reichmuth C; Ghoul A; Southall BL
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Oct; 132(4):2147-50. PubMed ID: 23039406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Intensity discrimination and detection of amplitude modulation.
    Wojtczak M; Viemeister NF
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1999 Oct; 106(4 Pt 1):1917-24. PubMed ID: 10530016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effect of signal duration on the underwater hearing thresholds of two harbor seals (Phoca vitulina) for single tonal signals between 0.2 and 40 kHz.
    Kastelein RA; Hoek L; Wensveen PJ; Terhune JM; de Jong CA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Feb; 127(2):1135-45. PubMed ID: 20136234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Frequency specific auditory evoked responses. Experiments on stimulus polarity, sweep frequency, stimulus duration, notched-noise masking level, and threshold estimation in volunteers with normal hearing].
    Schönweiler R; Neumann A; Ptok M
    HNO; 2005 Nov; 53(11):983-94. PubMed ID: 16283133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Duration selective neurons in the inferior colliculus of the rat: topographic distribution and relation of duration sensitivity to other response properties.
    Pérez-González D; Malmierca MS; Moore JM; Hernández O; Covey E
    J Neurophysiol; 2006 Feb; 95(2):823-36. PubMed ID: 16192332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Robot-assisted assessment of wrist proprioception: does wrist proprioceptive acuity follow Weber's law?
    Contu S; Marini F; Cappello L; Masia L
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2016 Aug; 2016():4610-4613. PubMed ID: 28269302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.