These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15480890)

  • 1. False-negative magnetic resonance angiography with extracranial internal carotid artery stenosis: a report of two cases and review of the literature.
    Gluf WM; O'Neill B; Couldwell WT
    Neurosurg Rev; 2005 Apr; 28(2):154-8. PubMed ID: 15480890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Accuracy and utility of three-dimensional contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography in planning carotid stenting.
    Timaran CH; Rosero EB; Valentine RJ; Modrall JG; Smith S; Clagett GP
    J Vasc Surg; 2007 Aug; 46(2):257-63; discussion 263-4. PubMed ID: 17600659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Duplex ultrasound and magnetic resonance angiography compared with digital subtraction angiography in carotid artery stenosis: a systematic review.
    Nederkoorn PJ; van der Graaf Y; Hunink MG
    Stroke; 2003 May; 34(5):1324-32. PubMed ID: 12690221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Overestimation of carotid artery stenosis with magnetic resonance angiography compared with digital subtraction angiography.
    Nederkoorn PJ; Elgersma OE; Mali WP; Eikelboom BC; Kappelle LJ; van der Graaf Y
    J Vasc Surg; 2002 Oct; 36(4):806-13. PubMed ID: 12368742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Noninvasive evaluation of collateral blood flow through circle of Willis in cervical carotid stenosis using selective magnetic resonance angiography.
    Ito K; Sasaki M; Kobayashi M; Ogasawara K; Nishihara T; Takahashi T; Natori T; Uwano I; Yamashita F; Kudo K
    J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis; 2014; 23(5):1019-23. PubMed ID: 24103664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Magnetic resonance angiography is an accurate imaging adjunct to duplex ultrasound scan in patient selection for carotid endarterectomy.
    Back MR; Wilson JS; Rushing G; Stordahl N; Linden C; Johnson BL; Bandyk DF
    J Vasc Surg; 2000 Sep; 32(3):429-38; discussion 439-40. PubMed ID: 10957649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Magnetic resonance angiography, digital subtraction angiography and Doppler ultrasonography in detection of carotid artery stenosis: a comparison with findings from histological specimens.
    Netuka D; Ostrý S; Belsán T; Rucka D; Mandys V; Charvát F; Bradác O; Benes V
    Acta Neurochir (Wien); 2010 Jul; 152(7):1215-21. PubMed ID: 20411283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Efficacy of patient selection strategies for carotid endarterectomy by contrast-enhanced MRA on a 1 T machine and duplex ultrasound in a regional hospital.
    Korteweg MA; Kerkhoff H; Bakker J; Elgersma OE
    Clin Radiol; 2008 Feb; 63(2):174-83. PubMed ID: 18194694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Carotid artery stenosis: contrast-enhanced MR angiography with two different scan times compared with digital subtraction angiography.
    Sundgren PC; Sundén P; Lindgren A; Lanke J; Holtås S; Larsson EM
    Neuroradiology; 2002 Jul; 44(7):592-9. PubMed ID: 12136361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of intra-arterial digital subtraction angiography, magnetic resonance angiography and duplex ultrasonography for measuring carotid artery stenosis.
    Modaresi KB; Cox TC; Summers PE; Jarosz JM; Verma H; Taylor PR; Padayachee TS
    Br J Surg; 1999 Nov; 86(11):1422-6. PubMed ID: 10583289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A combined TCD and MRA screening for significant siphon portion of internal carotid artery (S-ICA) stenosis.
    Aoki J; Kimura K; Iguchi Y; Shibazaki K; Kobayashi K; Sakai K; Sakamoto Y
    J Neuroimaging; 2012 Apr; 22(2):172-6. PubMed ID: 21223433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Accuracy of digital subtraction angiography, computed tomography angiography, and magnetic resonance angiography in grading of carotid artery stenosis in comparison with actual measurement in an in vitro model.
    Smith JC; Watkins GE; Smith DC; Palmer EW; Abou-Zamzam AM; Zhao CX; Zhang WW
    Ann Vasc Surg; 2012 Apr; 26(3):338-43. PubMed ID: 22285345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Doppler ultrasound and contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography in assessing carotid artery stenosis.
    D'Onofrio M; Mansueto G; Faccioli N; Guarise A; Tamellini P; Bogina G; Pozzi Mucelli R
    Radiol Med; 2006 Feb; 111(1):93-103. PubMed ID: 16623309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Actual role of unenhanced magnetic resonance angiography (mra tof 3d) in the study of stenosis and occlusion of extracranial carotid artery.
    Scarabino T; Fossaceca R; Carra L; Florio F; Marano G; Carriero A
    Radiol Med; 2003; 106(5-6):497-503. PubMed ID: 14735016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Contrast-enhanced 3-D MRA in decision making for carotid endarterectomy: a 6-year experience.
    Barth A; Arnold M; Mattle HP; Schroth G; Remonda L
    Cerebrovasc Dis; 2006; 21(5-6):393-400. PubMed ID: 16534196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Diagnosis of carotid artery stenosis with oculopneumoplethysmography alone and in combination with MRA.
    Elias RM; Wald JT; Kallmes DF
    Vasc Health Risk Manag; 2012; 8():631-9. PubMed ID: 23209371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The reliability of ultrasound measurements of carotid stenosis compared to MRA and DSA.
    Honish C; Sadanand V; Fladeland D; Chow V; Pirouzmand F
    Can J Neurol Sci; 2005 Nov; 32(4):465-71. PubMed ID: 16408576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparative study of magnetic resonance angiography, digital subtraction angiography, duplex ultrasound examination with surgical and histological findings of atherosclerotic carotid bifurcation disease.
    Liberopoulos K; Kaponis A; Kokkinis K; Pagratis N; Nicolakopoulou Z; Douskou M; Stringaris K; Clonaris C; Balas P
    Int Angiol; 1996 Jun; 15(2):131-7. PubMed ID: 8803637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Efficacy of screening MR angiography and Doppler ultrasonography in the evaluation of carotid artery stenosis.
    White JE; Russell WL; Greer MS; Whittle MT
    Am Surg; 1994 May; 60(5):340-8. PubMed ID: 8161084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Internal carotid artery stenosis: accuracy of subjective visual impression for evaluation with digital subtraction angiography and contrast-enhanced MR angiography.
    U-King-Im JM; Graves MJ; Cross JJ; Higgins NJ; Wat J; Trivedi RA; Tang T; Howarth SP; Kirkpatrick PJ; Antoun NM; Gillard JH
    Radiology; 2007 Jul; 244(1):213-22. PubMed ID: 17507721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.