201 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15481165)
1. Falling into line: the impact of utilization review hassles on physicians' adherence to insurance contracts.
Weiner SJ; VanGeest JB; Wynia MK; Cummins DS; Wilson IB
J Clin Ethics; 2004; 15(2):139-48. PubMed ID: 15481165
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Justifiable deception in everyday practice.
Wolf BL; Johnson A; Payne K
J Allergy Clin Immunol; 2010 Apr; 125(4):939-41. PubMed ID: 20226504
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Physicians' interactions with third-party payers: is deception necessary?
Bogardus ST; Geist DE; Bradley EH
Arch Intern Med; 2004 Sep; 164(17):1841-4. PubMed ID: 15451757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Impact of managed care on physicians' decisions to manipulate reimbursement rules: an explanatory model.
VanGeest J; Weiner S; Johnson T; Cummins D
J Health Serv Res Policy; 2007 Jul; 12(3):147-52. PubMed ID: 17716417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Who guards the guards--medical ethics in insurance medicine].
Dobloug JH
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2013 Feb; 133(3):320-1. PubMed ID: 23381171
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. What would you do? Testing and insurance.
Weiss GG
Med Econ; 2006 Dec; 83(23):74, 77-8, 81. PubMed ID: 17212337
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The physicians' perspective medical practice in 2008.
Physicians' Foundation
J Miss State Med Assoc; 2009 Feb; 50(2):61-2. PubMed ID: 19297949
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Online professionalism: social media, social contracts, trust, and medicine.
Snyder L
J Clin Ethics; 2011; 22(2):173-5. PubMed ID: 21837889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of practice patterns for the care of open-angle glaucoma compared with claims data: the Glaucoma Adherence and Persistency Study.
Quigley HA; Friedman DS; Hahn SR
Ophthalmology; 2007 Sep; 114(9):1599-606. PubMed ID: 17572498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Gathering evidence from claims data: caveats.
Coleman AL
Ophthalmology; 2007 Sep; 114(9):1597-8. PubMed ID: 17822970
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Thou shalt follow guidelines (please!).
Diamond F
Manag Care; 1998 Sep; 7(9):14-5, 19-22. PubMed ID: 10185869
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Law, medicine, and wealth: does concierge medicine promote health care choice, or is it a barrier to access?
Carnahan SJ
Stanford Law Pol Rev; 2006; 17(1):121-63. PubMed ID: 17165233
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Practicing accountability in professional ethics.
d'Oronzio JC
J Clin Ethics; 2002; 13(4):359-66. PubMed ID: 12793330
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Facilitating adherence to the tobacco use treatment guideline with computer-mediated decision support systems: physician and clinic office manager perspectives.
Marcy TW; Skelly J; Shiffman RN; Flynn BS
Prev Med; 2005 Aug; 41(2):479-87. PubMed ID: 15917044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Is your doctor lying for you?
Comarow A
US News World Rep; 1999 Oct; 127(16):66-7. PubMed ID: 10623296
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. When subtle deception turns into an outright lie.
Schwab AP
Am J Bioeth; 2009 Dec; 9(12):30-2. PubMed ID: 20013495
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Medicine and the pharmaceutical industry: a call to action.
Stiles MM; Barrett B
Am Fam Physician; 2007 May; 75(10):1447, 1451; discussion 1451. PubMed ID: 17555137
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Blurring boundaries and online opportunities.
Farnan JM; Arora VM
J Clin Ethics; 2011; 22(2):183-6. PubMed ID: 21837892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Medical professionalism: a tale of two doctors.
Gorrindo T; Groves JE
J Clin Ethics; 2011; 22(2):176-8. PubMed ID: 21837890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Are independent medical examiners truly independent?
Spencer RF
Pain Physician; 2010; 13(1):92-3; author reply 93-4. PubMed ID: 20119468
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]