365 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15481302)
1. Breast conservation therapy for invasive lobular carcinoma: the impact of lobular carcinoma in situ in the surgical specimen on local recurrence and axillary node status.
Stolier AJ; Barre G; Bolton JS; Fuhrman GM; Looney S
Am Surg; 2004 Sep; 70(9):818-21. PubMed ID: 15481302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The impact of lobular carcinoma in situ in association with invasive breast cancer on the rate of local recurrence in patients with early-stage breast cancer treated with breast-conserving therapy.
Jolly S; Kestin LL; Goldstein NS; Vicini FA
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2006 Oct; 66(2):365-71. PubMed ID: 16965988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Risk of local failure in breast cancer patients with lobular carcinoma in situ at the final surgical margins: is re-excision necessary?
Sadek BT; Shenouda MN; Abi Raad RF; Niemierko A; Keruakous AR; Goldberg SI; Taghian AG
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2013 Nov; 87(4):726-30. PubMed ID: 24064317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Pathologic findings from the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast Project (NSABP) Protocol B-17. Five-year observations concerning lobular carcinoma in situ.
Fisher ER; Costantino J; Fisher B; Palekar AS; Paik SM; Suarez CM; Wolmark N
Cancer; 1996 Oct; 78(7):1403-16. PubMed ID: 8839545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Factors predicting in-breast tumor recurrence after breast-conserving surgery.
Mechera R; Viehl CT; Oertli D
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2009 Jul; 116(1):171-7. PubMed ID: 18815880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Nonpalpable versus palpable invasive breast tumors treated with breast-conserving surgical management.
Tafra L; Essner R; Brenner RJ; Giuliano AE
Am Surg; 1996 May; 62(5):395-9. PubMed ID: 8615571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Is lobular carcinoma in situ as a component of breast carcinoma a risk factor for local failure after breast-conserving therapy? Results of a matched pair analysis.
Ben-David MA; Kleer CG; Paramagul C; Griffith KA; Pierce LJ
Cancer; 2006 Jan; 106(1):28-34. PubMed ID: 16329136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The impact of margin status in breast-conserving therapy for lobular carcinoma is age related.
Jobsen JJ; Riemersma S; van der Palen J; Ong F; Jonkman A; Struikmans H
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2010 Feb; 36(2):176-81. PubMed ID: 19647390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Margin status and the risk of local recurrence after breast-conserving treatment of lobular breast cancer.
van den Broek N; van der Sangen MJ; van de Poll-Franse LV; van Beek MW; Nieuwenhuijzen GA; Voogd AC
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2007 Sep; 105(1):63-8. PubMed ID: 17115109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Axillary regional recurrence after sentinel lymph node biopsy for breast cancer.
Rosing DK; Dauphine CE; Vargas MP; Gonzalez K; Burla M; Kaufmann P; Vargas HI
Am Surg; 2006 Oct; 72(10):939-42. PubMed ID: 17058740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The influence of additional surgical margins on the total specimen volume excised and the reoperative rate after breast-conserving surgery.
Huston TL; Pigalarga R; Osborne MP; Tousimis E
Am J Surg; 2006 Oct; 192(4):509-12. PubMed ID: 16978962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Breast-conserving surgery in breast cancer].
Ruggiero R; Procaccini E; Freda F; Iovino F; Irlandese E; Gili S; Lo Schiavo F
G Chir; 2005; 26(11-12):449-52. PubMed ID: 16472427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Accuracy of intraoperative gross examination of surgical margin status in women undergoing partial mastectomy for breast malignancy.
Balch GC; Mithani SK; Simpson JF; Kelley MC
Am Surg; 2005 Jan; 71(1):22-7; discussion 27-8. PubMed ID: 15757052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Alternative therapy for elderly patients with breast cancer.
von Rueden DG; Sessions SC
Am Surg; 1994 Jan; 60(1):72-8. PubMed ID: 8273979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Secondary operations are frequently required to complete the surgical phase of therapy in the era of breast conservation and sentinel lymph node biopsy.
Mullenix PS; Cuadrado DG; Steele SR; Martin MJ; See CS; Beitler AL; Carter PL
Am J Surg; 2004 May; 187(5):643-6. PubMed ID: 15135683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The effect of multiple reexcisions on the risk of local recurrence after breast conserving surgery.
O'Sullivan MJ; Li T; Freedman G; Morrow M
Ann Surg Oncol; 2007 Nov; 14(11):3133-40. PubMed ID: 17653798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Second operation more frequent following breast-conserving treatment for invasive lobular than for invasive non-lobular carcinoma].
de Zeeuw S; Wildenberg F; Strobbe L; Wobbes T
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2009; 153():A56. PubMed ID: 19900317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Impact of concurrent proliferative high-risk lesions on the risk of ipsilateral breast carcinoma recurrence and contralateral breast carcinoma development in patients with ductal carcinoma in situ treated with breast-conserving therapy.
Adepoju LJ; Symmans WF; Babiera GV; Singletary SE; Arun B; Sneige N; Pusztai L; Buchholz TA; Sahin A; Hunt KK; Meric-Bernstam F; Ross MI; Ames FC; Kuerer HM
Cancer; 2006 Jan; 106(1):42-50. PubMed ID: 16333852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The role of reexcision for positive margins in optimizing local disease control after breast-conserving surgery for cancer.
Aziz D; Rawlinson E; Narod SA; Sun P; Lickley HL; McCready DR; Holloway CM
Breast J; 2006; 12(4):331-7. PubMed ID: 16848842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Intra-operative touch preparation cytology; does it have a role in re-excision lumpectomy?
Valdes EK; Boolbol SK; Cohen JM; Feldman SM
Ann Surg Oncol; 2007 Mar; 14(3):1045-50. PubMed ID: 17206481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
