BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

199 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15481867)

  • 1. Clean indoor air policies in Wisconsin workplaces.
    Guse CE; Marbella AM; Layde PM; Christiansen A; Remington P
    WMJ; 2004; 103(4):27-31. PubMed ID: 15481867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Protecting workers from secondhand smoke in North Carolina.
    Plescia M; Malek SH; Shopland DR; Anderson CM; Burns DM
    N C Med J; 2005; 66(3):186-91. PubMed ID: 16130941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Strength of clean indoor air laws and smoking related outcomes in the USA.
    McMullen KM; Brownson RC; Luke D; Chriqui J
    Tob Control; 2005 Feb; 14(1):43-8. PubMed ID: 15735299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Measuring progress to protect workers from job-related secondhand smoke in Texas.
    Patt DA; Shopland DR; Anderson CM; Burns DM; Dunnington J; Gritz ER
    Tex Med; 2005 Dec; 101(12):50-6. PubMed ID: 17094502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Lower levels of cigarette consumption found in smoke-free workplaces in California.
    Woodruff TJ; Rosbrook B; Pierce J; Glantz SA
    Arch Intern Med; 1993 Jun; 153(12):1485-93. PubMed ID: 8512439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Predictors of smoke-free workplaces by employee characteristics: who is left unprotected?
    Delnevo CD; Hrywna M; Lewis MJ
    Am J Ind Med; 2004 Aug; 46(2):196-202. PubMed ID: 15273973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Smoking policies in manufacturing and assembly workplaces, Wisconsin, 1999.
    Aakko E; Schafer E; Gyarmathy VA; Narita E; Remington P
    WMJ; 2001; 100(3):67-9. PubMed ID: 11491037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Workplace smoking ban policy and smoking behavior.
    Kim B
    J Prev Med Public Health; 2009 Sep; 42(5):293-7. PubMed ID: 19806001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Assessing smoke-free workplaces in Wisconsin municipal and county government buildings, 1997.
    Aakko E; Remington P; Dixon J; Ford L
    WMJ; 1999; 98(1):38-41. PubMed ID: 10050153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Finding common ground: how public health can work with organized labor to protect workers from environmental tobacco smoke. National Association for Public Health Policy.
    J Public Health Policy; 1997; 18(4):453-64. PubMed ID: 9519620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Does the workplace-smoking ban eliminate differences in risk for environmental tobacco smoke exposure at work?
    Verdonk-Kleinjan WM; Knibbe RA; Tan FE; Willemsen MC; de Groot HN; de Vries H
    Health Policy; 2009 Oct; 92(2-3):197-202. PubMed ID: 19398142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Occupational disparities in smoke-free workplace policies in Arkansas.
    Bourne DM; Shopland DR; Anderson CM; Burns DM
    J Ark Med Soc; 2004 Nov; 101(5):148-54. PubMed ID: 15554180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. After the smoke has cleared: evaluation of the impact of a new national smoke-free law in New Zealand.
    Edwards R; Thomson G; Wilson N; Waa A; Bullen C; O'Dea D; Gifford H; Glover M; Laugesen M; Woodward A
    Tob Control; 2008 Feb; 17(1):e2. PubMed ID: 18218788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The impact of tobacco use and secondhand smoke on hospitality workers.
    Siegel M; Barbeau EM; Osinubi OY
    Clin Occup Environ Med; 2006; 5(1):31-42, viii. PubMed ID: 16446252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The role of labor organizations in tobacco control: what do unionized workers think?
    Mitchell RJ; Weisman SR; Jones RM; Erickson D
    Am J Health Promot; 2009; 23(3):182-6. PubMed ID: 19149423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Did the Tobacco Control Act Amendment in 1995 affect daily smoking in Finland? Effects of a restrictive workplace smoking policy.
    Helakorpi SA; Martelin TP; Torppa JO; Patja KM; Kiiskinen UA; Vartiainen EA; Uutela AK
    J Public Health (Oxf); 2008 Dec; 30(4):407-14. PubMed ID: 18003652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Reduced exposure to secondhand smoke at casinos in Puerto Rico after the implementation of a workplace smoking ban in 2007: a pre-post design.
    Marín HA; Díaz-Toro EC
    P R Health Sci J; 2011 Dec; 30(4):182-7. PubMed ID: 22263298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Support for tobacco control policies among youth in North Carolina.
    Conlisk E; Proescholdbell SK; Pan WK
    N C Med J; 2006; 67(3):175-9. PubMed ID: 16846156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Workplace smoking restrictions in China: results from a six county survey.
    Ma J; Apelberg BJ; Avila-Tang E; Yang G; Ma S; Samet JM; Stillman FA
    Tob Control; 2010 Oct; 19(5):403-9. PubMed ID: 20798022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Smoking restrictions in private workplaces in Singapore.
    Koh YH; Voo YO; Yong LS
    Singapore Med J; 1994 Jun; 35(3):250-6. PubMed ID: 7997897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.