116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1548206)
1. Effect of hot-fat trimming on factors associated with the subprimal yield of beef carcasses.
Ahmed PO; Miller MF; Shackelford SD; Johnson LP; Williams SE; McCann MA; Reagan JO
J Anim Sci; 1992 Feb; 70(2):439-43. PubMed ID: 1548206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Estimates of subprimal yields from beef carcasses as affected by USDA grades, subcutaneous fat trim level, and carcass sex class and type.
Griffin DB; Savell JW; Morgan JB; Garrett RP; Cross HR
J Anim Sci; 1992 Aug; 70(8):2411-30. PubMed ID: 1506304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The influence of sex-class, USDA yield grade and USDA quality grade on seam fat trim from the primals of beef carcasses.
Jones DK; Savell JW; Cross HR
J Anim Sci; 1990 Jul; 68(7):1987-91. PubMed ID: 2384389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effects of breed type and accelerated fat removal on subprimal yields and carcass values.
Miller MF; Ramsey CB; Claborn SW; Wu CK
J Anim Sci; 1995 Apr; 73(4):1055-63. PubMed ID: 7628948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Beef carcass composition of slaughter cattle differing in frame size, muscle score, and external fatness.
May SG; Mies WL; Edwards JW; Williams FL; Wise JW; Morgan JB; Savell JW; Cross HR
J Anim Sci; 1992 Aug; 70(8):2431-45. PubMed ID: 1506305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Prediction of retail product and trimmable fat yields from the four primal cuts in beef cattle using ultrasound or carcass data.
Tait RG; Wilson DE; Rouse GH
J Anim Sci; 2005 Jun; 83(6):1353-60. PubMed ID: 15890812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effect of frame size, muscle score, and external fatness on live and carcass value of beef cattle.
May SG; Mies WL; Edwards JW; Williams FL; Wise JW; Harris JJ; Savell JW; Cross HR
J Anim Sci; 1992 Nov; 70(11):3311-6. PubMed ID: 1459891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Dual-component video image analysis system (VIASCAN) as a predictor of beef carcass red meat yield percentage and for augmenting application of USDA yield grades.
Cannell RC; Tatum JD; Belk KE; Wise JW; Clayton RP; Smith GC
J Anim Sci; 1999 Nov; 77(11):2942-50. PubMed ID: 10568462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Influence of body condition score on carcass characteristics and subprimal yield from cull beef cows.
Apple JK; Davis JC; Stephenson J; Hankins JE; Davis JR; Beaty SL
J Anim Sci; 1999 Oct; 77(10):2660-9. PubMed ID: 10521025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Yield grade and carcass weight effects on the cutability of lamb carcasses fabricated into innovative style subprimals.
Garrett RP; Savell JW; Cross HR; Johnson HK
J Anim Sci; 1992 Jun; 70(6):1829-39. PubMed ID: 1634407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Relative contributions of subcutaneous and intermuscular fat to yields and predictability of retail product, fat trim, and bone in beef carcasses.
Dikeman ME; Cundiff LV; Gregory KE; Kemp KE; Koch RM
J Anim Sci; 1998 Jun; 76(6):1604-12. PubMed ID: 9655580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Determining beef carcass retail product and fat yields within 1 hour postmortem.
Apple JK; Dikeman ME; Cundiff LV; Wise JW
J Anim Sci; 1991 Dec; 69(12):4845-57. PubMed ID: 1808179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Predicting carcass composition of beef cattle using ultrasound technology.
Griffin DB; Savell JW; Recio HA; Garrett RP; Cross HR
J Anim Sci; 1999 Apr; 77(4):889-92. PubMed ID: 10328353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Live and carcass values from different cattle types.
Mies WL; Harris JJ; Knapp RH; Edwards JW; Terry CA; Savell JW; Cross HR
J Anim Sci; 1992 May; 70(5):1314-25. PubMed ID: 1526899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Gluteus medius and rump fat depths as additional live animal ultrasound measurements for predicting retail product and trimmable fat in beef carcasses.
Realini CE; Williams RE; Pringle TD; Bertrand JK
J Anim Sci; 2001 Jun; 79(6):1378-85. PubMed ID: 11424672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The effect of a leptin single nucleotide polymorphism on quality grade, yield grade, and carcass weight of beef cattle.
Kononoff PJ; Deobald HM; Stewart EL; Laycock AD; Marquess FL
J Anim Sci; 2005 Apr; 83(4):927-32. PubMed ID: 15753349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Online evaluation of a commercial video image analysis system (Computer Vision System) to predict beef carcass red meat yield and for augmenting the assignment of USDA yield grades. United States Department of Agriculture.
Cannell RC; Belk KE; Tatum JD; Wise JW; Chapman PL; Scanga JA; Smith GC
J Anim Sci; 2002 May; 80(5):1195-201. PubMed ID: 12019606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. National Beef Quality Audit-2005: survey of targeted cattle and carcass characteristics related to quality, quantity, and value of fed steers and heifers.
Garcia LG; Nicholson KL; Hoffman TW; Lawrence TE; Hale DS; Griffin DB; Savell JW; Vanoverbeke DL; Morgan JB; Belk KE; Field TG; Scanga JA; Tatum JD; Smith GC
J Anim Sci; 2008 Dec; 86(12):3533-43. PubMed ID: 18676726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. National Beef Quality Audit-2011: In-plant survey of targeted carcass characteristics related to quality, quantity, value, and marketing of fed steers and heifers.
Moore MC; Gray GD; Hale DS; Kerth CR; Griffin DB; Savell JW; Raines CR; Belk KE; Woerner DR; Tatum JD; Igo JL; VanOverbeke DL; Mafi GG; Lawrence TE; Delmore RJ; Christensen LM; Shackelford SD; King DA; Wheeler TL; Meadows LR; O'Connor ME
J Anim Sci; 2012 Dec; 90(13):5143-51. PubMed ID: 22952369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Real-time augmentation of USDA yield grade application to beef carcasses using video image analysis.
Steiner R; Wyle AM; Vote DJ; Belk KE; Scanga JA; Wise JW; Tatum JD; Smith GC
J Anim Sci; 2003 Sep; 81(9):2239-46. PubMed ID: 12968699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
