These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

68 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15482444)

  • 1. Which route to recovery? Controlled retrieval and accessibility bias in retroactive interference.
    Lustig C; Konkel A; Jacoby LL
    Psychol Sci; 2004 Nov; 15(11):729-35. PubMed ID: 15482444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Probabilistic retroactive interference: the role of accessibility bias in interference effects.
    Jacoby LL; Bishara AJ; Hessels S; Hughes A
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2007 May; 136(2):200-16. PubMed ID: 17500646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Implicit proactive interference, age, and automatic versus controlled retrieval strategies.
    Ikier S; Yang L; Hasher L
    Psychol Sci; 2008 May; 19(5):456-61. PubMed ID: 18466406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Honeybees (Apis mellifera) holding on to memories: response competition causes retroactive interference effects.
    Cheng K; Wignall AE
    Anim Cogn; 2006 Apr; 9(2):141-50. PubMed ID: 16374626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Proactive and retroactive interference in young adults, healthy older adults, and older adults with amnestic mild cognitive impairment.
    Ebert PL; Anderson ND
    J Int Neuropsychol Soc; 2009 Jan; 15(1):83-93. PubMed ID: 19128531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Characteristics of spatial memory in pigeons.
    Olson DJ; Maki WS
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1983 Jul; 9(3):266-80. PubMed ID: 6886631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Dissipation of retroactive interference in human infants.
    Gulya M; Rossi-George A; Rovee-Collier C
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2002 Apr; 28(2):151-62. PubMed ID: 11987872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A comparison of automatic and intentional instructions when using the method of vanishing cues in acquired brain injury.
    Riley GA; Venn P
    Neuropsychol Rehabil; 2015; 25(1):53-81. PubMed ID: 25066788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Memory and the Korsakoff syndrome: not remembering what is remembered.
    d'Ydewalle G; Van Damme I
    Neuropsychologia; 2007 Mar; 45(5):905-20. PubMed ID: 17005214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Retrieval variability: sources and consequences.
    Miller RR; Kasprow WJ; Schachtman TR
    Am J Psychol; 1986; 99(2):145-218. PubMed ID: 2876652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Ordinal process dissociation and the measurement of automatic and controlled processes.
    Hirshman E
    Psychol Rev; 2004 Apr; 111(2):553-60. PubMed ID: 15065923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Further exploration of controlled and automatic memory processes in early Alzheimer's disease.
    Adam S; Van der Linden M; Collette F; Lemauvais L; Salmon E
    Neuropsychology; 2005 Jul; 19(4):420-7. PubMed ID: 16060816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The influence of delaying judgments of learning on metacognitive accuracy: a meta-analytic review.
    Rhodes MG; Tauber SK
    Psychol Bull; 2011 Jan; 137(1):131-48. PubMed ID: 21219059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Proactive interference, accessibility bias, and process dissociations: valid subjective reports of memory.
    Jacoby LL; Debner JA; Hay JF
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2001 May; 27(3):686-700. PubMed ID: 11394674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Memory retrieval given two independent cues: cue selection or parallel access?
    Rickard TC; Bajic D
    Cogn Psychol; 2004 May; 48(3):243-94. PubMed ID: 15020213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effective cue utilization reduces memory errors in older adults.
    Thomas AK; Bulevich JB
    Psychol Aging; 2006 Jun; 21(2):379-89. PubMed ID: 16768582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Working memory capacity and self-regulatory behavior: toward an individual differences perspective on behavior determination by automatic versus controlled processes.
    Hofmann W; Gschwendner T; Friese M; Wiers RW; Schmitt M
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2008 Oct; 95(4):962-77. PubMed ID: 18808271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Encoding specificity manipulations do affect retrieval from memory.
    Zeelenberg R
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2005 May; 119(1):107-21. PubMed ID: 15823245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Examining the proactive and retroactive placement of augmented information for learning a novel computer alphabet.
    Patterson JT; Lee TD
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2008 Mar; 62(1):42-50. PubMed ID: 18473628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effect of context and metamemory judgements on automatic processes in memory.
    Carroll M; Shanahan C
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 1997 Dec; 97(3):219-34. PubMed ID: 9466240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.