These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1548447)

  • 1. Sign- versus goal-tracking: effects of conditioned-stimulus-to-unconditioned-stimulus distance.
    Silva FJ; Silva KM; Pear JJ
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1992 Jan; 57(1):17-31. PubMed ID: 1548447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Topography of spatially directed conditioned responding: effects of context and trial duration.
    Burns M; Domjan M
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2001 Jul; 27(3):269-78. PubMed ID: 11497325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Duration of signals for intertrial reinforcement and nonreinforcement in random control procedures.
    Cooper LD; Aronson L; Balsam PD; Gibbon J
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1990 Jan; 16(1):14-26. PubMed ID: 2303790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Resistance to change within heterogeneous response sequences.
    Reid AK
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2009 Jul; 35(3):293-311. PubMed ID: 19594277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of an extinguished CS on competition with another CS.
    Bills CH; Dopheide M; Pineño O; Schachtman TR
    Behav Processes; 2006 Mar; 72(1):14-22. PubMed ID: 16457968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Sign- and goal-tracking in Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua).
    Nilsson J; Kristiansen TS; Fosseidengen JE; Fernö A; van den Bos R
    Anim Cogn; 2008 Oct; 11(4):651-9. PubMed ID: 18478284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of changing the unconditioned stimulus on appetitive blocking.
    Ganesan R; Pearce JM
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1988 Jul; 14(3):280-91. PubMed ID: 3404082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Influence of visual conditioned stimulus characteristics on the form of Pavlovian appetitive conditioned responding in rats.
    Holland PC
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1980 Jan; 6(1):81-97. PubMed ID: 7373228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Summation in autoshaping is affected by the similarity of the visual stimuli to the stimulation they replace.
    Pearce JM; Redhead ES; George DN
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2002 Apr; 28(2):175-89. PubMed ID: 11987874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The attribution of incentive salience to an appetitive conditioned cue is not affected by knockout of the serotonin transporter in rats.
    Nonkes LJ; van de Vondervoort II; Homberg JR
    Behav Brain Res; 2014 Feb; 259():268-73. PubMed ID: 24269496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. On the respective contributions of awareness of unconditioned stimulus valence and unconditioned stimulus identity in attitude formation through evaluative conditioning.
    Stahl C; Unkelbach C; Corneille O
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2009 Sep; 97(3):404-20. PubMed ID: 19685998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Conditioning of active type avoidance in the rat : effect of the interval between conditioned stimulus and unconditioned stimulus].
    Del Grosso N; Spinozzi G; Robustelli F
    Arch Fisiol; 1973 Dec; 70(3-4):219-32. PubMed ID: 4807472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Sign tracking versus goal tracking in the sexual conditioning of male Japanese quail (Coturnix japonica).
    Burns M; Domjan M
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1996 Jul; 22(3):297-306. PubMed ID: 8691160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of stimulus orderability and reinforcement history on transitive responding in pigeons.
    Lazareva OF; Wasserman EA
    Behav Processes; 2006 May; 72(2):161-72. PubMed ID: 16460886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Posttraining shifts in the overshadowing stimulus-unconditioned stimulus interval alleviates the overshadowing deficit.
    Blaisdell AP; Denniston JC; Miller RR
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1999 Jan; 25(1):18-27. PubMed ID: 9987855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Spatial serial conditioning maintained with minimal temporal contingency.
    Mazur GJ; Sanabria F
    Behav Processes; 2011 May; 87(1):135-41. PubMed ID: 21238551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Interoceptive Pavlovian conditioning with nicotine as the conditional stimulus varies as a function of the number of conditioning trials and unpaired sucrose deliveries.
    Wilkinson JL; Murray JE; Li C; Wiltgen SM; Penrod RD; Berg SA; Bevins RA
    Behav Pharmacol; 2006 Mar; 17(2):161-72. PubMed ID: 16495724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Nicotine-enhanced Pavlovian conditioned approach is resistant to omission of expected outcome.
    Stringfield SJ; Boettiger CA; Robinson DL
    Behav Brain Res; 2018 May; 343():16-20. PubMed ID: 29407412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Further evidence of a sensory-tonic interaction in pigeons.
    Thomas DR; Lyons J
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1968 Mar; 11(2):167-71. PubMed ID: 5645873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Latent inhibition of a CS during CS-US pairings.
    Hall G; Pearce JM
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1979 Jan; 5(1):31-42. PubMed ID: 528877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.